Comments by "Just Me" (@JustMe-ec2ph) on "The Hill"
channel.
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@David Garcia Hogwash on what Yang's expansion is claimed to do! There is more than one type of social security! Yang would make some of the poorest people choose between welfare assistance and UBI. That's NO expansion for them!
And to set the record straight what Bernie offered his campaign to start with which was equivalent to $15 an hour they turned down! You do know they are unionized but the end agreement ending up not only giving them equal to more than $15 an hour but great healthcare! A lot of workers would love to have their income and benefits.
Over 200 economists have signed a pledge to raise the min wage to $15. I think they know more than you do as well as over 200 economists are for BERNIE'S Medicare for all of which Yang IMO is a liar and fraud the way he uses the label for his benefit but against the Bill. Hey that's what he said was correct, he's using the label so don't blame me for what he said.
https://twitter.com/PoppyHarlowCNN/status/1153675747774664705
I also disagree with your opinion on UBI and so do 144 other references as far as it doing everything Yang claims.
CORE CONCLUSIONS
CHAPTER NINE
Taking account of the evidence and arguments set out above, we come to
the following conclusions.
▪ Making cash payments to individuals to increase their purchasing power
in a market economy is not a viable route to solving problems caused or
exacerbated by neoliberal market economics.
▪ There is no evidence that any version of UBI can be affordable, inclusive,
sufficient and sustainable at the same time.
▪ There is no evidence that UBI will help to increase the bargaining power
of workers and trade unions, or solve problems of low pay and precarious
work.
▪ Rapidly changing labour markets, inadequate welfare systems, poverty, inequality and powerlessness are complex problems that call for complex
changes on many levels: there is no “silver bullet” of the kind that UBI is
often claimed to be.
▪ The campaign for UBI threatens to divert political energies – as well as
funds – from more important causes.
▪ It is necessary and possible to raise funds to bring greater security, opportunity and power to all people, but the money needed to pay for an
adequate UBI scheme would better spent on reforming social protection
systems, and building more and better quality public services.
▪ Many (although not all) proponents of UBI see it as a means to fix problems
that unions care about. Thus the UBI debate creates important opportunities for unions to advocate for quality public services, progressive labour
and welfare reform.
▪ However, unions should be careful when intervening in these debates that
they do not unnecessarily alienate those proponents of UBI who are potential allies.
144 references are mentioned at the end of this report!
http://www.world-psi.org/sites/default/files/documents/research/en_ubi_full_report_2019.pdf
UBI debate.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFVr7Ku0KQk&feature=youtu.be
By the way it is the progressive that is AGAINST UBI while the conservative some say he's Libertarian is the one for UBI.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Great video on Warren and adding to the rest of my research on her.
WARREN the I won't take dark money in the primary but will the general might as well take it in the primary because to me there is no difference! Either way they will be beholding to those corp donors. So many reasons why I don't trust her and you need to think twice if you think she would win the general.
Warren was totally silent while peaceful Natives were being brutalized at Standing Rock and that was when she still thought she was Native American. What about the crimes against those peaceful Native Americans? She wouldn't even fight for what she thought was her people or care about the crimes against them but you think she so will do something about the crimes against the immigrants she mentioned or for any of the rest of us.
She is all over the place on Medicare for all so that would be the best place for Warren to compromise to make her corp donors happy.
On Healthcare, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris Think You’re Stupid
https://benjaminstudebaker.com/2019/07/09/on-healthcare-elizabeth-warren-and-kamala-harris-think-youre-stupid/?fbclid=IwAR3W0kpjv4Nld_XI2IzuzYJpeFJlZkHKBUNvMFyBc9YKQ-LRynwye13e9pI
Warren’s votes to approve 68 percent of military spending bills reveal a lack of conviction on tackling the very obstacle she acknowledges"
https://portside.org/2019-04-04/heres-how-2020-candidates-stack-war-and-peace
she has voted to approve over two-thirds of the “bloated” military spending bills that have come before her in the Senate."
Elizabeth Warren Gets Endorsement From Wall Street — The Political Vigilante
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEPn9c7Edls
Ms. Warren left Dow Chemical off her 2012 list of clients. After Mr. Jacobson’s blog revealed her representation, she spun her work for the industrial giant as instrumental in setting up a $2.3 billion trust to pay women who said they were injured by the implants.
That explanation, though, doesn’t jibe with her duty as an attorney for Dow, where she was bound to represent the company’s interests.
“The notion that Warren was representing anyone other than her client is preposterous,” Mr. Jacobson said. “As an attorney, she had a duty of loyalty to Dow Chemical. If she explored possible ways in which Dow Chemical could extricate itself through settlement, her services were on behalf of and for the benefit of Dow Chemical, not the women.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/28/elizabeth-warren-corporate-lawyer-past-looms-over-/
Her statement on Assange:
"Warren distanced herself from Assange but condemned the Justice Department’s move to curtail press freedom. “Assange is a bad actor who has harmed U.S. national security — and he should be held accountable,” Warren said in a statement." End of quote. Assange didn't harm national security. She can't condemn the Justice dept in one sentence for curtailing freedom and in the next condemn someone that was exercising their press freedom.
ELIZABETH WARREN SAYS SHE WOULD TAKE BRIBES FROM THE 1 PERCENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itiacoqgdQI
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5