Comments by "Zasz" (@Z4r4sz) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

  1. James is a person who likes to control both sides of a conversation and still loses the argument.
    629
  2. As expected from a cult.
    51
  3.  @isaacw8503  "It’s the overwhelming opinion of academia that claims are evidence." After centuries of establishing reasonable standards in academia, they suddenly abandoned reason and became as gullible as the average theist... So says some random nobody on youtube at least. So it must be true! Seriously, rather than presenting evidence theists love to debate what should count as evidence because we all know theists dont actually have any evidence.
    20
  4. McLoser started his tirades and rants on twitter, posting screenshots of you and said "you cannot concede the presence of any weaknesses in, or evidence against, your own position". He even owns himself because he is so incredibly oblivious.
    18
  5.  @Actias1974  Because creationists are in a cult. The leaders of a cult are always right and any criticism of the cult is persecution and nobody is more right than the cult leader.
    17
  6. The end is so epic. McLoser controls both sides of the conversation (on twitter, with himself) but still loses the argument :D
    15
  7. I checked out the paper referenced at 1:08:34 and they added a disclaimer: "The Journal of Theoretical Biology and its co-Chief Editors do not endorse in any way the ideology of nor reasoning behind the concept of intelligent design. Since the publication of the paper it has now become evident that the authors are connected to a creationist group (although their addresses are given on the paper as departments in bona fide universities). We were unaware of this fact while the paper was being reviewed. Moreover, the keywords “intelligent design” were added by the authors after the review process during the proofing stage and we were unaware of this action by the authors. We have removed these from the online version of this paper. We believe that intelligent design is not in any way a suitable topic for the Journal of Theoretical Biology."
    15
  8.  @davidbutler1857  They also do this with Mary Schweitzers Paper on "soft tissue in dinosaur fossils". They conveniently leave out the fragment part and pretend they found steaks.
    14
  9.  @familyshield6405  James is a liar. There is no sugar coating that. Its what creationists do. But somehow you had to make it about Dave... Maybe watch the debate for the first time before you lie about it. Because I watched it and he did show ALOT of material.
    10
  10. Thats hilarious :D
    9
  11. Yes, the mindset is very important.
    7
  12. I got alcohol poisoning after his intro...
    7
  13. I did a quick search here on youtube. He called in the atheist experience back when Tracy was still active. He posted the segment where he got spanked by Tracy and his own followers tell him he shouldnt have done that because he looks so bad :D
    7
  14. Today McLoser linked to another biologist in his latest blog and sold him as an evolutionary biologist. It literally takes seconds to look that guy up to learn he studies plants. Thats a pretty dumb lie I say. Thats the kind of person McLoser is.
    7
  15. Calling anyone in the creationist a liar or clueless isnt an insult. Its literally their doctrine to lie and pretending to know everything about everything.
    6
  16. "In my original video I caught him saying something unbelievably stupid." That narrows it down :D
    5
  17. Creationists want the attention through debates, pretending there is a controversy when they share the stage with an actual scientist or someone qualified to talk about the topics creationists misrepresent. They are like trolls. Dont feed them in the public.
    5
  18. I wouldnt say tour and meyer have no clue. They have been at this crap for decades. Its more likely they cant keep their lies straight anymore.
    5
  19. Because that costs money and they rather keep it by lying to their gullible audience who dont care to ask for any applications.
    5
  20. "I just watched the debate with Dr. Tour. You tried to tarnish his character." If you believe tour didnt do that by his pathetic performance alone then you either havent watched it or you are just another dum tour zealot. "Fact #1 no scientist is even remotely close to creating any type of life in a lab." If life cant be created then it debunks creationism, not science. "The way chemists talk you would think they can resurrect the dead." Actually that what theists always claim, not scientists. Ever heard of jesus? "Mean while they cannot even keep a simple cell alive." Because cells arent supposed to stay outside the body. "They do not even know what is lost when a cell dies." Umm... When a cell dies... then a cell is lost. This is rocket science for you? "I would call you a science troll but imp sounds more fitting." With that much projecting you should have an imax rating. Dumbass.
    4
  21. "The main point here (I think anyway) is how exactly life started from nonlife. We don't know." And then creationists say "god did it", pretending to know because they read it in a book with talking snakes and donkeys. Its one of the many fallacies creationists use. Actually creationists use all of them. One was even coined because of the bullshit creationists say. The christian faith fallacy and Hoyle's fallacy.
    4
  22. I tried addons that are supposed to block results I specify but they all stopped working and google or other search engines dont offer a blocker themselves. I totally get your frustration.
    4
  23. As far as debates go, this wasnt very good. I can imagine Dave absolutely hates Tour because Tour has a loooooooong history of lying about pretty much everything like every creationist. But Tour has no clue about basic conversations. Im glad Tour embaressed his discovery institute. Too bad creationists cant experience shame. Im sure they will twist this into a victory to their gullible cultists. I`ll wait for a more detailed review to clear up the questions about the papers presented.
    4
  24. Hitler wrote a book where he constantly invoked christianity and publically promoted christianity. He published his own version of the bible, made a deal with churches (who supported his policies) and had his soldiers wear belt buckles with "god with us" written on them. Doesnt get more religious than that.
    4
  25. Its odd, isnt it? These people dedicate decades of their time to obsess over evolution in the most simple terms, try to discredit it by lying, write useless books to be sold on amazon, copy the format of actual science journals to pretend to offer science... and then write they dont deny what they oppose? It doesnt make sense.
    4
  26. Doesnt sound creepy at all...
    4
  27. Apparently anyone can get such credentials in the US. I mean, when Kent Hovind can get them, anyone can. But the language they use proves they never really studied on the level of actual academy.
    3
  28. Are there any non-embarassments in the creationist community?
    3
  29. Im in germany too and I can say you are full of shit. " I don't know how USA was in the pandemic, but germany got like a kind of dictatorship in the pandemic:" First lie. Except the entire country missed the dictatorship but only the uneducated conspiracy nutjobs noticed it. So weird. "- doubts about the need of lockdowns? censored, laughed at or named conspiracy - anyway that they never helped like propagandised!" Second lie. Uneducated morons pretending to know even remotely as much about how to handle a pandemic or how viruses work were laughed at. For good reasons. Nobody censored you from embarassing yourself but many people didnt want to listen to unhinged rants like yours every day. "- the ministry for health (and propaganda)? RKI (a big health institute in germany), not the ministry in the government" Third lie. The Robert Koch Institute is the central institution of the Federal Government in the field of disease surveillance and prevention. "- laws for lockdowns and relaxations? given by the RKI, not the ministry in the government, the ministry in the government was only about to accept them and set them to laws" Fourth lie. See above. "- vaccinations? sure they're "voluntarily" - just get a vaccination and you keep all fundamental rights" Fifth lie. Nobody lost any rights. Not one! But private stores and companies have health regulations like dont walk without shoes into our store, dont bring deadly & easily transmitted diseased into our stores, dont walk in naked, dont touch open food when you arent buying it, wear a mask when working with spray paint, wear a helmet on a construction site and so on. Not one right lost. "- effects of lockdowns and relaxations? "Sure they helped and were needed" - f... off that they never effected like propagandated: If lockdowns would help, the infections would go down, if relaxations were so harmful the infections would go up -> the reality showed the opposites!" Sixth lie. You have no clue how a pandemic works or how viruses spread. "- the damage of the vaccines? people have massive vaccine damages that often ruin their lifes, but they must sue to get a little tiny bit of money for it!" Seventh lie. A tiny minority has side effects due to unforseen circumstances regarding individual physiology. This is very much known about every vaccine and pill people take. "- proven false propaganda by the RKI and the government themselves:" By clowns like you? Yeah, right. "-> "the vaccines aren't harmful at all"" Overwhelmingly they arent. You would know if you understood anything about minorities with rare conditions. "-> "the vaccinations won't be mandatory"" Correct. Nobody got forced to take one. The last time it was mandatory was when smallpox still existed. You know, before it got eradicated by vaccines. Companies just decided its safer to vaccinate their employees to prevent infecting customers because thats very bad for business. You dont want to follow safety guidelines? Pack your things and fuck off. "-> "there will be only 1 vaccination and then it will be over"" I doubt anyone at the RKI ever said that. But you wont provide a source of course. And even the followup vaccines were still not forced. "-> "we have working vaccines" - the reality: the known vaccines only help to get better through if you've Covid but they never ever protect against it!" Because thats exactly how vaccines work! There is no magical shield against these things. You get it and you either have antibodies or you dont. Vaccines provide the antibodies. Thats how it always has been. "-> "no fundamental rights will be restricted"" None were restricted. What was restriced was the way people interact in stores and in crowded places like concerts, large indoor events which all got canceled until the regulations how to go on came out. Nobody was forced to stay at home. People who got diagnosed with covid were sent home and told its safer to stay there to not infect others. And the reasonable people stayed home. But no rights were restricted. You are a liar. The american, science denying, conspiracy nutjob, shoe sized IQ crowd has the same list of bullshit.
    3
  30. Because they want to waste money, people and resources with fake technologies while companies make big money with fake technologies. Or some similar bullshit.
    3
  31. "nihilistic wordview of materialism and atheism"... Seriously? How did that buffoon aquire his degrees? Or did he only dust off the objects on display in his previous line of work? That guy is certainly not a scientist now if he ever was one. He has no clue and lies so obviously its cringy. But thats probably the reason he got hired. Creationists are so pathetic and greedy.
    3
  32. That was enough word salad to end world hunger. Literally.
    3
  33. But wait! There's more! A term specifically invented for people like Tour is "fractal wrongness". When his entire statement is as wrong as every individual part of it. Or the other way around.
    3
  34. A scientific law is a basic principle, generalization, regularity or rule that holds true universally under particular conditions. A scientific theory is a body of data.
    3
  35. Every theistic argument is a logical fallacy.
    3
  36. People shouldnt debate creationists. It gives creationist followers the impression there are two equal sides to these topics which creationists exploit to further mislead their gullible followers.
    3
  37.  @DP-ot6zf  Corrected by a creationist? Yeah, right :D
    2
  38. Even when all of meyers bullshit is wrong about the cambrian explosion, he disproves EVERYTHING he promotes and preaches when he talks about prehistoric events that contradict his creation myth or young earth creationism. He is literally too stupid to lie without contradicting his own bullshit. Creationists at their best.
    2
  39. "I'm certain your incapable of reasoning" Its "you're". genius. Actually using insults properly is a sign of intelligence. Just like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8AX7QN68bw
    2
  40. He works for an organisation that has the goal to infiltrate school boards and the education system. Also known as wedge strategy and project blitz.
    2
  41.  @michaelcrossley4716  To be fair, it was uploaded on other channels days ago.
    2
  42. I havent met a creationist who showed signes of shame. Im sure its part of their character to not feel shame anymore for their ridiculous beliefs.
    2
  43. Whining in several videos and lying all the time is what some loser who tries to stay relevant to keep his grift going is exactly what I expect from religious apologists. They have no shame nor do they feel guilty for milking their gullible fans for money. Its almost criminal.
    2
  44. "a guy as qualified as Dr. Tour" Creationists like MISTER tour aquire degrees only to preach pseudoscience that goes against everything they learned which makes their degrees worthless. They just get the degrees to fool gullible people like you. And it works! Thats how fraudsters work. They have absolutely no research outside their useless books on amazon.
    2
  45. Actually just last week scientists created matter from nothing. So creationists should finally stop claiming its not possible. "If we look at the question of who created human life" Why does it have to be a who? Why cant it be a what?
    2
  46. Except gods are not as demonstrable as dropping a pen to prove gravity exists. Dropping a pen, ironically ken does this, proves gravity. Nothing proves any god.
    2
  47. I always say creationists get degrees and then turn around to promote something that goes against everything they have learned to aquire those degrees. Its like getting a degree in geology and then promoting a flat earth. It invalidates their degree and opinion.
    2
  48. All you have to do is challenge James to present research from his group, the discovery institute, that passed peer review and is used anywhere in science. He wont because everything he does at the discovery institute is lying. Its literally his job to lie. His gullible audience doesnt care about that and is too stupid to fact check anything. They never wonder why creationism or the current rebranded version sprinkled with science terms intelligent design is only propaganda. There is no use for it anywhere, there are no applications, there is no advancement in any field because of it. Its the definition of pseudoscience. You dont really have to debunk him. All you have to do is challenge him, sit back and wait. His silence will be deafening.
    2
  49. "Actually, Giordano Bruno was sent to the stake by John Calvin, the very Calvin in Calvinism. For once, he was not burnt by the Catholic Church" Actually he embraced Calvinism. He was tried for heresy by the Roman Inquisition on charges of denial of several core Catholic doctrines. The Inquisition found him guilty, and he was burned alive at the stake in Rome's Campo de' Fiori in 1600.
    2
  50. Yeah, why not believe in fairytales, myths and reality defying claims ... Insane, isnt it?
    2
  51. One Minute in and the theist invokes hitler, stalin, mao and pot. Instantly exposing to have no clue about history, no clue how he implies every modern atheist is like hitler, stalin, mao and pot... somehow. Why? They never explain. Because they cant. It makes them look dumb to try. So pretending nobody ever expects them to explain seems to be the better option. Which still makes them look dumb because they have no clue what they are talking about or implying. Which is normal behavior for theists especially hardcore creationists at the discovery institute who are obsessed with debunking science they learned to understand and then deny to be factual. Which invalidates their degrees and their opinions. One can only loath these dumbfucks.These idiots have nothing but they are obsessed with criticizing anyone who points out that they have nothing for their own position-
    2
  52.  @simongiles9749  Are you refering to plagiarism ? Its a serious offense in my country amongst academics and can lead to your dr title revoked.
    1
  53.  @simongiles9749  I dont see anything wrong with using your own previous work to build into current work. As long as both are peer reviewed. If the first isnt then the second has an obvious flaw. Using the work of others that show your work has merrit isnt a problem either. As long as you credit them.
    1
  54. Its interesting how he claims he isnt anti-evolution and accepts evolution as fact but then pulls out all creationist claims to make the case evolution isnt a thing.
    1
  55. "it's sad how people use the Bible to deceive people telling them things that is not in the Bible" Thats literally the purpose of christianity. To lie, steal, indoctrinate, deceive up to killing people. "there are some brothers that they are scientists and admit that the Bible is the word of God" No, they work in completely unrelated fields that have nothing to do with the claims in the bible. There is a an engineer at NASA who believes the earth is less than 10.000 years old. Its just his opinion, not scientific fact. "in the bronze age when the book of Job was written God explain ..." Uhm... no. A book CLAIMS someone else alledgedly states something. Big difference. "the Bible says that the earth is floating in space" Which is false. The earth doesnt float or hang. Its tethered to the gravity of our sun which is moving around the center of the galaxy. "it explains the water cycle" Not accurately. "explains the core of the earth" Not really. "It's crazy how some people use the Bible for their own good not to help others" Like I said, thats literally the purpose of christianity. To lie, steal, indoctrinate, deceive up to killing people. "The reason why God put those things on the Bible" The book was literally written by ignorant, goat humpers in the middle eastern desert who split into three groups because they disagreed on what to write down after they made it up. I expect a god to write a much better book. "science will develop for us to prove later that the Bible is Fact" Then come back when science actually did that because so far it doesnt.
    1
  56. Dont be afraid of liars. Creationists have an overinflated ego that can appear intimidating but only if you let them. Remember they are deceptive, even when it comes to their overconfidence. A few specific questions are enough to reduce them to flea size. Like "what applications came from creationism/intelligent design research?" and they are instantly squirming and lying because there are no applications from pseudoscience and scientific fraud.
    1
  57.  @CherryGS  Lets hope so.
    1
  58. Just skip the intro and go right into open conversation. Skip a Q&A too. Just talk. This "I want time to talk" is just an attempt to preach or gish gallop in Tours side because we all know he loves to gish gallop to waste time that we wont get back to adress all his ignorant points. The idea to dictate what material can be discussed is just absurd. Tour wants to control this debate so hard because we all know he doesnt know enough about the topic to handle the papers he constantly misrepresents and lies about. This is already a trainwreck. Imagine the fallout after the debate if its anything like the video and emails. If creationists are capable of embarassment they distance themselves from tour after this disaster thats coming.
    1
  59. One thing I disagree with. Its probably just splitting hairs but words have no meaning, they have usage.
    1
  60. Like Tour, Cameron is one of the dumbest and most dishonest apologists. No suprise he is a big fan of Craig, the guy who defended the slaughter of children in the name of his imaginary friend.
    1
  61.  @paulthompson9668  "I'll pray for you", Christianese for "fuck you".
    1
  62. Never do a livestream or public debate with a creationist. It makes them appear they are on the same level as actual scientists so their gullible flock is convinced there is a controversy.
    1
  63. Unfortunately too few indoctrinated theists are reconnected with reality through such videos. But its still great to watch and even learn something new. Even though I never get a degree in biology :D Society doesnt punish these science deniers. Universities dont revoke the titles they earned only to go 90° to pretend everything they learned is based on lies. Youtube freely lets them promote pseudoscience. In the end they all benefit financially from this giant fraud. Some of those creationist organisations pay taxes, youtube makes huge profits through ads because these creationist channels are so popular, universities profit because getting a degree isnt cheap. It only frustrates me even more that the universities that wasted so much time to teach them the science and dont have rules to revoke their degrees. Degree revocation is extremely rare, and almost always involves some major, willful misconduct such as plagiarizing long sections or falsifying data. I guess being a fraudster on youtube doesnt count as falsifying data while having a fake science journal like the discovery institute, institute for creation research, creation research society, (C)answers in genesis and too many others who pretend to do scientific research but failing to follow basic science standards. Its criminal!
    1
  64. I read about an egypt writer, dont remember his profession, used two obelisks very far apart to calculate the curviture of the earth. Back then they were still building the pyramids.
    1
  65.  @TheCadman069  How do you get from "they are breathing the same air from the same trees like everyone on this planet" to "they are artificial creations of someones imaginary friend" ???
    1
  66. Its easy. One side has applications for their claims and the other does not. The one with no applications can be disgarded as pseudoscience.
    1
  67. Dave, you ended too soon at 33:10. The last sentence is supposed to imply the DI could be shut down at any moment by... someone... because they write this stuff which they sell as "the truth" and the powers that be obviously supress "the truth" from christian propaganda organisations.
    1
  68. Counter-comment.
    1
  69. The problem is his flock is even dumber to notice.
    1
  70. Usual kruger-dunning-effect victims have 0% clue and 100% confidence. And then there is Jamar. He is his own level of stupid. What a failure.
    1
  71. "My salvation is not dependent on my goodness at all." *Kent Hovind Q&A - Tardigrades Rewrite Evolution Theory - UFOs, Holiness, Youtube (November 28, 2015)
    1
  72. There are decent religions who arent theistic. So a total ban would send the wrong message. But I have zero opposition towards a ban on every theistic religion because they are always lies, inodctrination, obsession with control & money and more lies.
    1
  73. Christians appeal to einsteins opinion to make the argument that if one of the most famous scientists in the past believes something that defies reality, then its a good reason to do it too. Which is just an appeal to authority fallacy. Every fallacy is an argument for gods. And all arguments for gods are logical fallacies.
    1
  74.  @pjaworek6793  Christians, and theists in general, dont care about such facts. Most dont even know because they only parrot what they heard from grifting pedo clergy in church or apologists.
    1
  75. Creationists are obsessed with critics because its usually the overwhelming amount of content they produce on youtube and their websites. Dealing with critics instead of naming a single application for their crap. Its more of a hating than research because they dont actually do research. They just post pictures of them in labcoats but no video of sitting in a lab and working. They lie about everything.
    1
  76.  @SkipSpotter  Im not sure exactly. I cant link it because youtube deletes such comments. But you can search for the headline and should find it easily: "Scientists create matter from nothing in groundbreaking experiment"
    1
  77. Because people like kent are narcisists who get off from behavior like this and get followers who worship him for it.
    1
  78.  @TheMilitantMazdakite  Are you suggesting only atheists are debunking claims about christian mythology? Cant hindus, muslims, jews, pastafarians, satanists and my grandmothers dog do that too? "What evidence have you that religion is a "lie"?" Which one? Christianity, islam, judaism, hinduism, moronism, scientology? Are you specifically talking about the iron age myths about a cosmic wizzard wearing a meat suit after giving birth to himself, unicorns, talking snakes and empty promises of living on after death which in itself is a contradiction in terms ? Yeah, those are obvious lies promoted by delusional people and grifters who exploit delusional people like you. People dont need to disprove whats obviously false. People need to back up claims. No supporting evidence, dismissed. Thats how we deal with every claim. Including religious claims. Otherwise Im claiming you love to diddle children and wait for you to provide evidence to the contrary. Be glad logic doesnt work that way. "Yeah, but you can have Christianity without creationism." Except without creationism one of the pillars of christianity vanishes which makes it difficult to make sense of the rest that is based on it. You would have to make shit up ontop of the made up shit that you want to exclude. Without creationism you dont get adam & eve and without them you dont get original sin or a need for jesus. And without salvation the entire religion just crumbles beyond its pile of garbage that it already is. "Christopher Hitchens is the imperialist propagandist I refer to." Today the term imperialism is commonly used in international propaganda to denounce and discredit an opponent's foreign policy. International organizations, including the United Nations, attempt to maintain peace using measures such as collective security arrangements and aid to developing countries. Your claim just doesnt make any sense. "Also, the people cheering him burning in hell were BASED!" The words are english but there is no meaning. Literally. "Would you condemn people for cheering on Joseph Goebbels burning in hell?" Hmm, would people who dont believe in an afterlife cheer about events in the afterlife... Hmmmmm. Lets have a think over that. A LOOOONG THINK! Dude, just stop. The discovery morons wont suck your dick for simping here.
    1
  79. A creationist who poses with his degree but cant tell the difference between darwinism and evolution or constantly claims "darwinists cant explain X" is obviously and evidently lying, making their degrees worthless because they learned this stuff to aquire their degrees. They know they are lying. We know they are lying. Actual scientists know they are lying. But they say it anyway to their gullible flock who have no clue whats what.
    1
  80. Funny thing is, creationists are such a fringe group that the majority of scientists arent even aware they exist. Thats how irrelevant creationists are in science.
    1
  81.  @AkrozeSmash  But all creationists lie and pretend to be educated or better educated than the entire scientific community. Each and every one of them is a fraudulent liar and they lie to gullible people every day. Its what pseudoscience does. Its no different with flat earthers and chemtrailers. And all of them promote a grand conspiracy against their delusions.
    1
  82.  @jdos5643  Quote from his about page: "I received a BA in chemistry from Carleton College, and performed graduate studies in both synthetic organic chemistry and science education at Cal State Northridge, receiving an MA in the latter. Prior to this I taught for about a decade in various high school and undergraduate settings, specializing in organic chemistry but also teaching general chemistry, physics, and biology." "he’s a fraud and he’s been exposed on his channel" Source: Your ass.
    1
  83.  @jdos5643  "you can brag about your said “qualifications”" I never mentioned my qualifications. I quoted Dave's. Hence the "quote" before the quote. "Start with the origins of the universe…..can you provide the facts please?" You want me, a random person on the internet, to give you a detailed explaination of one of the biggest mysteries in science because we have little to no access to the rest of the universe to investigate an event thats long past, to some delusional little shit who believes he knows more than any scientist alive and dead... in a youtube comment section... Seriously? The short answer is: I dont know. The long answer is: I dont know because I have no access to tools to investigate and I dont really give a shit about the topic. But me not knowing doesnt automatically mean your delusional claim that your imaginary, magical friend poofed everything into existance because an iron age book with talk snakes says so which you believe without question. "or are you going to coward and delete your comment like many unqualified evolutionist do?…." Unlike you I have nothing to be ashamed of nor reason to delete my comments because unlike you I have a sense of credibility and intellectual integrity. You think someone has an evidence based answer? Go to them. Ask them to show you their nobel prize. Then beg them to explain reality to a worm like you.
    1
  84.  @jdos5643  In no reality in the infinate multiverse is what you said correct. "atheists are Adamant about calling theories facts in science" It literally takes seconds to look up the term "scientific theory" to learn that theories are the highest form of knowledge in science, explaining the facts. FUCKING SECONDS! Atomic theory, theory of matter and energy, cell theory, germ theory, theory of plate tectonics, theory of evolution, theory of quantum mechanics, theory of relativity, theory of light energy, theory of electromagnetism, theory of radioactivity, theory of molecular bonds, theory of homeostasis, theory of gravity, etc.. Evolution is a scientific theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. "If you cannot explain the Big Bang theory and I quote you it’s a “mystery” then neither can or should you call it a fact" Whats with this obsession about the big bang? I didnt call it a fact. Its not an actual scientific theory. Every scientist knows that. Its just that over time the name stuck with it. Yet every scientist understands the difference between it being a hypothesis that we might never elevate to the level of a scientific theory but it still has valid evidence supporting it partially. Like a few other hypothesises about the origin of the universe. And even if scientists knew absolutely nothing about the origin of the universe, theists like you or those pretending to be scientists have done nothing to prove that a god exists or was involved in any event. "the Big Bang was Invented by a Christian ironic how atheist hold It as a fact and still call it an Unexplainable mystery lol how contradicting is that?" A scientist who happened to be a christian had a hypothesis, it got investigated for decades, turned out we found supporting evidence, turns out people talk about it... Somehow thats contradicting. Thats fucking stupid. "And if you admit that the universe is too vast to comprehend? Then why be so quick to dismiss the only plausible explanation that God did it?" Ah, yes. The feuerstein fallacy. God might exist outside our knowledge but we have no way to investigate therefor god is an acceptable explaination. Somehow... You have not provided anything that convinces any rational person that your god exists, that he has powers or that he used his powers to do anything. Theists always fail at the first challenge. Thats why I dismiss the god claims. "You admit to not knowing 90% percent of what’s out here yet deny a God or creator." Yes, because you dont know either. Because its an argument from ignorance fallacy. Or in your terms "we dont know how it happened therefor god". Every other type of theist could bring the same claim about their god and nobody could falsify it. Its completely useless. "When setting God aside as the only source for the universe you then accept the belief in a magic box..." Except natural forces have literally nothing in common with magic. You promote magic, not me. "And if you don’t know as you just admitted then why are you giving your invalid input?" Not knowing about the origin doesnt invalidate my opinion on the topic of your imaginary friend. Especially since your nonsense claims are filled with fallacies. "with your comment you just demonstrated you have no intellectual integrity" Admitting to not know an answer instead of making shit up is by definition intellectual integrity. Which is the opposite of what you are doing because you pretend to be better educated than any scientist. "All you have proven is the opposite or pure dishonesty." Thats called projecting. Evidently. "You said and I quote you you don’t know or care a $h@ about the topic. Yeah you said it all."* Because the origin of the universe doesnt tell you anything about the topic of the video. Context is important. For me at least. "Btw, I don’t use such language in my vocabulary because that’s not what my professors taught as part of curriculum…." Of course not. All those fallacies, false accusations, projecting, lies, being a douche is totally not such language. /s "and there you are still proving yourself a coward who deletes his comments because you have nothing factual to say or even defend your false beliefs." You literally responded to my comments that I havent deleted, I defended my position and now you lie about both. But keep pretending you loser are a scientist. Someday someone might be dumb enough to fall for it. PATHETIC!
    1
  85. Grifters who take money from thousands of gullible people dont deserve any courtesy. They deserve all the shit and namecalling that flies their way.
    1
  86. Those divers who can hold their breath for that long also dont live very long. Their average lifetime is between 20-30.
    1
  87. " Key question that was never answered, "why does that prove common ancestors, and not common designer" " Natural processes that make life possible to emerge and a magical, invisible, undetectable designer who creates life artificially without leaving a shred of evidence for his existance and work are a contradiction. You cant have both. There, easily answered.
    1
  88. This obsession to attack darwin to claim modern biology hasnt made any progress in biology, microbiology, genetics, paleontology and other fields is as dumb as attacking the wright brothers to make the case that modern planes dont exist. We clearly made progress in 150 years. Well, not clearly to morons who deny science.
    1
  89. If he gave you 3k bucks (in whatever currency) then he must have made or will make much more from his gullible cultists in some way. He gave it away so easily which is another red flag.
    1
  90. Its the job of everyone working at a creationist organisation and ministry to defend the indefensible, to be ignorant and to exploit the even more ignorant and gullible.
    1
  91.  @NcxX-c8f  They all have their own speciality of being terrible people Hovind is just a clown with youtube viewers, the DI has lots of useless books on amazon for profit, ken ham tells people never to trust scientist, the institute for creation research is similar... They all are more obsessed with attacking anyone who isnt gullible like them and doesnt believe in fairytales. They have nothing for their own alledged position but hot air. They are all frauds. Its criminal what they are doing and its criminal they are allowed to exploit people with bullshit.
    1
  92. He obviously is talking about the overwhelming majority of countries where its not allowed to drive on the left side. One country is not the example here.
    1
  93. One would think after decades of selecting quotes and data from biologists, creationists would have the equivalent of a full education in evolutionary biology. But they still lie about it. these people know they are lying. Because they are christians. Christians always lie. They have to.
    1
  94. Theists, not all religious people. There are religious people who dont have a reputation of lying. Theists have one. All of them. Big difference.
    1
  95. "When that day comes when you find out that there is a God" Which means nobody alive is justified to believe this god exists, dumbass.
    1
  96.  @damonm3  Its because they are grifters. Anyone who gets degrees only to deny what they learned to get those degrees to lie for a living to gullible & ignorant people is a fraud. The fact that they copy the format of science journals to publish their blog posts reviewed by each other to pretend to offer valid science supports this. Lying, deceiving and exploiting are the true creationist "values" after all. Because every creationist has to lie to defend creationism. These people cant even admit to be wrong about anything. About changing minds, ken hams organisation has a statement of faith one has to sign before working even as a janitor there. Thats how fanatical creationists are. Flat earthers never get this kind of grift going yet they offer the same kind of pseudoscience and arguments and no research.
    1
  97. At 12:40 I was really wondering if these frauds ever listen to their own or just lie because it sells their books or they are just stupid. During the kitzmiller trial they used a mouse trap to claim "remove one part and its useless therefor irreducible complexity is a thing". Then comes the actual scientist, removes one part and uses it as a tie clip to illustrate that by removing one part it simply changes instead of becoming useless. Now the discovery institute is still using the same lie as always, pretending nobody can see the kitzmiller trial or read the countless counterarguments with illustrations. And they still throw a fit when someone calls them frauds. Shameless frauds as always.
    1