Comments by "Zasz" (@Z4r4sz) on "The Longest-Running Evolution Experiment" video.

  1.  @Narokkurai  Because lying and pretending to know science better than scientists is what science deniers do.
    8
  2. We literally used selective breeding for over 20.000 years to create different sub-species of dogs and other animals. Hell, dogs only exist because of humans breeding wolves. The egypt bred the big cats into small cats. Exactly as the evolution model suggests. "but is doesn't explain life and different kinds" Evolution only adresses how life changes, not where or how it originates. But it shows why there are different species and sub-species and hybrids and so on. The word "kind" has no meaning in science. "even Darwin himself was sceptical because of that" No, he wasnt. If I had to guess, you read a very specific paragraph of darwins book presented by some youtube preacher who pretends to be a biologist and didnt include the next paragraph after the one where darwin mentioned a skeptical sentence? In a book where he described how he observed birds that changed and werent the same at some generations earlier....
    6
  3. "hydroplate theory which is a creationist theory" Creationist stories arent theories. A scientific theory is the highest form of knowledge in science. Creationism is literally religious superstition sprinkled with science buzzwords. "Not only is there compelling evidence for the flood..." Who won the nobel prize for that? It seems the entire world missed those news. It’s a theory that compliments science, creation, and history all in one." Sounds like someone tossed a bible, a book about geology and paleontology into a mixer and hit "extra fine". Pretty much how flat earther and chemtrailers operate, not scientists. "Thousands of studies from hundreds of researchers have backed it. There’s a book called ‘In the Beginning’ that’s pretty thick with evidence." Its funny how you jump from alledged research nobody knows about to a book on amazon as if amazon is considered credible scientific literature just because its published there. "On top of the thousands of stories of people passing and what they saw on the other side." Ah, yes. Stories of oxygen deprived patients who magically get memories when their conscience somehow was completely detached from their body to form memories. Totally credible. "But the creationists don’t have as many holes in their theory as the Big Bang does" But the flat earthers don’t have as many holes in their theory as geology does. But the chemtrailers don’t have as many holes in their theory as environmental research does. This is how you sound. "And I’ve come to find creation is the most logical conclusion especially because the Bible has already proven about 80% of its prophecies to be true by the 2000s" Now we really know you havent studied anything. You just parrot christian apologetic nonsense. "Especially to those questioning." You arent questioning. You are uneducated, gullible and delusional. Want to buy a bridge?
    5
  4.  @josiaphus  "trying, it just doesn't make sense to me." You should stop pretending to know better than trained experts when you admit it doesnt make sense. You are like a pre-schooler who wants to explain engineering to an actual engineer. Maybe dont start writing your nobel prize acceptance speech just yet.
    5
  5. We have rocks older than the moon. Even if the moon didnt exist, evolution is still real. As this video demonstrates. Because the moon and evolution have nothing in common. "the moon only has about 6000 years worth of sediment on it" Even ken ham and his crew say not to use the moon dust argument. "I did the math calculations in 91" WARNING! Creationist math! "why has this not been seen earlier" Because you have no clue how things work.
    3
  6.  @josiaphus  Nobody here suggested you shouldnt question anything. But you know that. You just had to lie about it. Thats why you arent smart. Unlike your church, in science you can question everything. Just not pretend to be smarter than anyone in the room while you are actually the dumbest who attempts to explain experts how their field of expertise works. Maybe one day you accidently get something right. Here it wasnt the case anywhere. Good luck in life. You seriously need it.
    3
  7. Yes, the bacteria evolved which is evidence for evolution. Thats the point. What do you expect? For it to change into an elephant?
    3
  8. The fact that the bacteria developed resistance again and again is evidence for evolution. This isnt about minor or major. It happens in every species. Thats the point.
    2
  9. This way you can develop medicine before bacteria evolve inside people outside the lab.
    2
  10.  @jasonmc4guitar  "The code was already there in the first strain of bacteria." There is no code. if it had resistance in the first place it wouldnt need to develop resistance. "Survival of the fittest is not evolution." Those who adapt the best to changes of the environment get to procreate and pass on their beneficial genes to the next generations. Thats how its been for three billion years on earth. Maybe study what you dont understand instead of pretending to be smarter than actual scientists.
    2
  11.  @chas6817  "A mutation is not evolution" Every biologist says otherwise. The definition of mutation says otherwise. The definition of evolution says otherwise. This video proves otherwise. You have to do better than "because I say so". "You still have bacteria from bacteria" Yes. Thats how evolution operates. Just because you expect an elephant being born from bacteria and it doesnt happen, doesnt mean you have disproven evolution. "I do understand when scientists talk about evolution and the false message that they believe in." Evidently not when you say mutations are not evolution or expect bacteria to turn into something else because that wouldnt be evolution. "There are people today that believe that the world is flat" Ironically creationists behave like flat earthers. Both have zero research for their nonsense. "The same goes for professors and students, you have to be of the same mind and believe in the same thing or you are not accepted" Ah, yes. The "big conspiracy" in science against crackpots who cant admit to be wrong and turn around to claim that science supports their nonsense. "The system weeds out those who do not believe in evolution so what we have is a group of scientists with one view." Yes, the system weeds out idiots who dont accept the scientific method in order to promote pseudoscience. Like flat earthers and creationists. THE HORROR! Seriously, those who dont accept established science but get degrees in science and then turn around and preach the opposite of what they learned then those people arent scientists. Look at the discovery institute. These people got PHDs and promote the opposite of what they learned, pretending to offer science but all they have are books with claims. You think these people should be allowed in science? "When a person is born with only one hand is that a mutation or is that evolution?" Thats a birth defect. "When a cow is born with two heads is that a mutation or is that evolution?" There was a second cow and they merged during the pregnancy. Its more of a birth defect than a mutation and therefor not evolution.
    1