Comments by "神州 Shenzhou" (@Shenzhou.) on "Fox Business" channel.

  1. 280
  2. 115
  3. 26
  4. 20
  5. 16
  6. 16
  7. 14
  8. 14
  9. 14
  10.  @tory6733  Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... ... But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, so why continue believe Western anti-China propaganda, when their economic predictions been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    13
  11. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. But its already 2018 and China's economy is still going strong, so its blatantly obvious that Western propagandists are lying about China's economic downfall for almost 30 years. At some point, you stop believing what Westerners say about China being on the brink of collapse.
    12
  12. 9
  13. 8
  14. 8
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 7
  18. 7
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. 7
  22. 7
  23. 6
  24. 6
  25. 6
  26. 6
  27. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. ... But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong, so why continue believe Western anti-China propaganda, when their economic predictions been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 3
  64. 3
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71. 3
  72. 3
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121.  @87aggietim  said: "Look at Taiwan they have a great economy." Taiwan had been under authoritarian single-party Kuomintang rule for more than half its life! For decades, the KMT ruled Taiwan with iron fist, and KMT leader Chiang kai-Shek was dictator who jailed and executed his dissidents and political rivals (whether real or perceived) in a period known as White Terror (白色恐怖) and Chiang impose martial law on Taiwan for more than 38 years, which was qualified as "the longest imposition of martial law by a regime anywhere in the world" at that time. But under authoritarian single-party KMT rule, Taiwan flourished and rapidly modernized, resulting in Taiwan Miracle (台湾奇迹) Between 1952 and 1982, Taiwan economic growth was on average 8.7%, and between 1983 and 1986 at 6.9%. Taiwan GDP grew by 360% between 1965 and 1986 and the percentage of global exports was over 2% in 1986, over other recently industrialized countries, and the global industrial production output grew a further 680% between 1965 and 1986. And it was all achieved under authoritarian single-party KMT rule. Only when democracy was introduced to Taiwan (because USA threatened to cut off weapons sales to Taiwan if KMT did not introduce political reforms) did Taiwan's economic growth became more modest in 1990s. Today Taiwan's economy is in a slump, wages are stagnant, cost of living is high, and Taiwan graduates are seeking job opportunities abroad, such as in mainland China or in Singapore. So what makes you think you can't have economic growth cannot under authoritarian rule? KMT authoritarian rule worked for Taiwan, then if it's not broken, why fix it?
    1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. +Tony Iacomi I clearly never said "China is the oldest civilization", I said "China is among the world's oldest 'continuous' civilization still alive today". Egypt may be older, but it is certainly not 'continuous' like Chinese civilization. For example, do Egyptians still speak Ancient Egyptian and write Egyptian Hieroglyphics today? Chinese culture today is still very much the culture as it was in the past. Chinese people still celebrate the Chinese New Year (like our ancestors did before) and Confucian values are still taught in China (as well as in Confucian institutes all over the world). Of course, not everything is the same after 5000 years of history, but Chinese culture is still distinct enough that the civilization is considered 'continuous'. I mean, even some Western scholars agree that China is among the oldest 'continuous' civilization. For example, Chinese values like honoring our ancestors still persist today. We have altars dedicated to our ancestors and during Qingming Festival 清明节 also known as "Tomb-Sweeping Day", we visit our ancestors graves to tidy up their surroundings and pay our respects to them. Also, did you know that the Chinese New Year migration, where Chinese people travel back to our home province to be with our families, is considered the world's largest annual human migration (even larger than the Christmas migration) ? About China's 5000 years of history, did you know that the Shang Dynasty (1600 BC) was once considered mythical until around 1950s where the Oracle Bone Script (Chinese Characters) were uncovered, showing that the Shang Dynasty really existed? The even earlier Xia Dynasty (2070) is considered mythological today, but it doesn't mean that it did not exist and new archaeological discoveries are always ongoing and uncovering more evidence to support China having 5000 years of history. I mean, Chinese nobility have been wearing luxurious silk clothing since 4th millennium BCE, whereas the rest of the world wore mostly loincloths as "bedsheets" called togas so how is our Chinese history only 3000 years? Silk is such a valued Chinese commodity that a trade route had been set up and named in honor of the precious material.
    1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. +Tony lacomi " One could argue that Greek's virtually unchanged political system is an important aspect of civilization. " But as far as I know, Greece is not considered a 'continuous' civilization by many scholars and historians, unlike China. Greek democracy, Spartan democracy, Athenian democracy, Republic of Rome's system, etc, they are all distinct from modern Western democracy. About China not being a united people until 221 BCE, Egypt was also not unified at one point, and was divided into Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt, each ruled by its own Pharaoh with distinct crowns of their own. So who can draw the line at when the start of civilization began in Egypt? Those 3 questions you asked and answered about people living in China, our language, and our civilization, they are just your personal beliefs that's all. After all, you clearly said "But what I would call as a civilization that still exists today? No." means its according to your own definition of a civilization that's all. Your wife's great grandmother grew up during turbulent time in China's history and was only recounting her own experiences. But Chinese belief in 5000 years of history existed long before 1950 and wasn't just the doing of Chairman Mao. For example, during the Qing Dynasty under the Manchu rulers, the Manchu textbook 滿蒙漢合璧教科書 (節錄) had a chapter China (中國) and a passage displayed read "Our country China is located in East Asia... For 5000 years, culture flourished (in the land of China)... Since we are Chinese, how can we not love China." For 5000 years, culture flourished (in the land of China) Source: wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty#History I mean, why are you basing what you know about China's history off your wife's great grandmother's stories? You think what she says is reliable? About the growing body of evidence about Chinese migrating from Egypt, can you list of the evidence you claimed? Many Chinese people belief we are descended from homonids found in East Asia, such as the Peking Man a Homo Erectus uncovered in Zhoukoudian 周口店 in 1920s. Excavations at the site under the supervision of Chinese archaeologists uncovered 200 human fossils (including six nearly complete skullcaps) from more than 40 individual specimens, but the work was sadly interrupted by the Japanese invasion of China. About "Why China will Never Rule the World" book, its just a book written by someone that's all. I mean, nobody expected Britain to become a colonial power, but it became one in 19th century. Nobody expected America to overtake its colonial master, but America did and became the superpower in 20th century. So why expect that China will never rule the world based on some author's book? China was a superpower for 1800 years before Britain became one herself, so who's to say China won't become superpower again in the future?
    1
  180. +Tony lacomi I have literally shown you a passage quoted from Qing Dynasty textbook 滿蒙漢合璧教科書 (節錄), proclaiming that China has 5000 years of history, whereas what have you shown but your wife's great grandmother's stories? You just claimed that "Before the 1950s, China never claimed to have 5,000 years of history" Why don't you show a copy of the Chinese textbook that says so, to support your claim? You keep saying there is a growing body of evidence of artefacts from Egypt that predate these human remains but have yet to produce any of this evidence. About China and Egypt, I found out that even the Ancient Egyptians found Chinese Silk to be valuable, and that silk has been found in the Valley of the Kings in a tomb of a mummy dating from 1070 BC. There are also Western scholars who believed the Han Chinese descended from Peking Man. For example, Franz Weidenreich (1873 – 1948) considered Peking Man as a human ancestor and specifically an ancestor of the Chinese people, as seen in his original multiregional model of human evolution in 1946. How exactly is Greece considered 'continuous'? You claim the political system is the same, but ancient Greek democracy is not the same as modern Western democracy. Greece was conquered by Rome and Rome introduced its own version of democracy, and then after the fall of Rome, there weren't any more democracies arising, until modern Western democracy came about 200-300 years ago. So how exactly is this considered 'continuous'? About Greek religion staying intact, do the people of Greece worship ancient Greek gods like Zeus, Aphrodite, Apollo, etc, like they did in the past? Or do the modern Greeks worship Christ instead today? Whereas China still has Chinese New Year festival (world's largest human migration) Qingming Festival, Mooncake Festival, etc, so where's your evidence to support your claim that Greek religion is intact much more than China? About China's 5000 years of 'continuous' history, what actually defines a history as continuous? Everyone have their own definition of continuous, but mine is that the history books can be traced almost completely to the civilizations origin. Chinese scholars have been recording Chinese history in every year. We have the names of all 650+ leaders of China, what period they ruled China, what government system they had, how many wives and concubines they had, how many children the royal family had, what happened to their sons, what happened to their daughters, which son succeeded him and so on. We have the historical names of all of China's armies top generals, the size of their armies, the strategies they used, which battles they won, which battles they lost, how many casualties they suffered, how many war horses were killed, what compensation was given to the deceased families, which territories were conquered and lost. We have information about other countries interaction with China, which states were under Chinese suzerainty, which were hostile to China, which were friendly to China, how much tribute was paid to China, and how much tribute China paid them. Of all the existing ancient civilizations, I would claim that none of them had a history as complete as that of China's. China did not have any "dark ages" where no information was being recorded and we can trace our history all the way back 5000 years to the beginning thanks to written texts by our ancestors. List of Chinese monarchs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_monarchs I mean, you just biased claim Chinese people today are the product of Mao, when I have shown proof of Chinese people celebrating ancient Chinese traditions, honoring our ancestors and our culture, visiting our relatives during Chinese New Year, eating Chinese food and so many other Chinese traditions. Even our classical music is Chinese and played from ancient Chinese instruments persevered from long ago, so who are you to claim Chinese people aren't what our ancestors were? Beautiful Chinese Music - Bamboo Flute video: youtube.com/watch?v=-5qhNRmMilI
    1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. Did you know that the Shang dynasty was once also considered to be "myth" as well, but later scientific research proven its existence? And in 2016, there is new geological evidence uncovered that may reveal the Xia dynasty to be real. Geologic Evidence May Support Chinese Flood Legend Source:https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/08/china-yellow-river-great-flood-xia-dynasty-yu/ China finds ‘great flood’ evidence supporting myth of first emperors Source:https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/archaeology/china-finds-great-flood-evidence-supporting-myth-of-first-emperors/news-story/4aa4b85724d2fc53f608f1f65f76edbc Archaeological excavation is always ongoing and uncovering new evidence every day. But a good majority of scholars, historians (even Westerners) agree that China is among the world's oldest 'continous' civilizations still alive today. Even other great ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have long since faded to history. Even the Chinese written characters have been continuously in use since 1200 BC, whereas Sumerian Cuneiform, Latin and Egyptian Hieroglyphs are considered dead languages today. And yes China has a bloody history of war. You can't possibly expect China to have 5000 years of history, and to have absolutely zero wars isn't it? In fact, One of the world famous thousand year old war literature, Sun Zi's The Art of War is still being taught in many military academies today. But the fact remains that China has been peaceful since 1979, and is currently not at war with any country. And since you bothered to calculate China's 3,790 wars or 1.26 wars per year then I can also say that USA fought 1032 wars from since 1775, or average 5 wars per year. So isn't USA still a worst warmonger? List of wars involving USA Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States
    1
  201. Gordon been predicting China's economy will fail. Similarly, Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. But China's economy is still going strong even in 2018, despite what these folks been saying for almost 30 years.
    1
  202. 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019 and China's economy is still going strong, so haven't Western economist been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. Jason Uzumaki Does that mean you can abuse vulgarities in your demands? I don't make demands that you answer any of my questions, so what obligation do I have to answer yours? In the end I still answered your question didn't I? Also, where did I ever treated you as "stupid and a peasant", compared to how you treat me? Merely talking about history is considered disrespecting you is that what you are implying? What makes you think that today with technology and power of weapons, Chinese people will fight back with only sticks and stones? Of course if our government is truly bad to the point where ordinary people can't take it anymore, then people will start acquiring modern weapons (from outside sources, stealing them, etc) and forming a resistance to fight back and overthrow the government. History is full of examples of such occurrences, so what makes you think just because the military technology has improved, that people are suddenly unable to rebel? Look at US wars in Middle East, such as Afghanistan and Iraq, and the militants there are at technological disadvantage compared to US troops, but still manage to drag the war for over 15 years. What about even further back, when North Vietnamese troops fought to defend their homeland from American troops, despite the technological disadvantage? In my opinion, technological prowess is not the only factor involved in deciding victory. Your full sentence was "I agree china should follow its own path, but if China's government dictated that decision and not the people of China then I see that as misuse of power and forces the people to accept it even if they didn't agree with it." wasn't it?
    1