Comments by "神州 Shenzhou" (@Shenzhou.) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. 10
  2. 9
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 5
  6. Western economists have been predicting China's economic downfall since 1990s. Here is compiled list of what Western journalists have to say about China's economy 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. But its already 2019, and China's economy is still going strong. Why continue to believe Western propaganda about China when Western economists predictions have been consistently proven wrong for almost 30 years?
    5
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. Where is Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons then? After Iraq war, no trace of WMDs were even found to be in Iraq's possession, so what is the motive for USA invading Iraq then? Now USA is claiming Syria has chemical weapons too? And what makes you think installing democracy isn't bad, when it results in bloodshed and civilian casualties? During Vietnam War, USA use napalm to burn out villages and chemicals like Agent Orange to destroy foliage to expose the Viet Cong, but it result in lingering effects on Vietnamese civilians. And what makes you think USA is responsible for South Korea and China responsible for Vietnam? Every country is responsible for itself. Look at USA invade Iraq and Afghanistan, and are those countries any better than they were before? In Civil War people die, just like in American civil war, so why are you blaming China for civil war? Today, China is not at war with any country, and is peaceful for 30 years since our last war in 1979. And killing people who disobey the government is part of capital punishment isn't it? Even the USA sentence criminals to death for disobeying the government laws so if you claim that this is bad, then why USA have capital punishment too? And you think all religion are good is that it? Why can't Chinese government take measures to curb religions that are disruptive to daily life? If you don't control the religion, then the religion will control your people isn't it? And regarding loans, China runs a business, not a charity. Why is it you think giving charity to people will help them? If you give someone a fish, they live for a day. If you teach him to fish, then they live for way longer. China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, schools, hospitals, hotels, shopping centers, powerstations and telecommunication projects, so that African nations can prosper. Isn't that much better than just giving charity?
    2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. +Crazy Asian Why do you keep mocking me being naive? Trump may not truly withdraw from NATO, but he is negotiate better terms for USA in NATO. NATO represents military interest of several countries, so how is it completely different from US military bases in South Korea and Japan? USA is not obliged to defend NATO countries if American citizens are unhappy about US military expenditure in NATO. That's one of reason Trump supporters voted for him in the first place right? Where is the lost of face from reducing US military expenditure in NATO? What proof do you have of Japan and S. Korea developing nuclear weapons once US troops withdraw? Both of them are NPT signatories, so where are they going to acquire nuclear weapon technology supplies from? Who will supply them with nuclear weapons? North Korean missiles can't even reach US mainland, so where is the inherent threat to US way of living? The closest that US mainland has ever come to being in great danger, was during Cuban Missile crisis, so what is the threat level faced by USA today? You think N. Korea won't be wiped off the map, once it attack USA? USA still suffers from occasional terrorists attack within its own soil. By sending its troops to Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, it is only destroying the lives of Middle Eastern countries, and therefore, the ranks of the terrorists swell with more and more poor people unhappy with USA. Even when one terrorist cell brought down, another rises in its place. Look at Taliban once being trained by CIA, which then rebel against USA. Even ISIS is said to be product of US constant intervention in Middle East. Guam has been on a quest for self-governance since 1980s. However, the federal government rejected the version of a commonwealth that the government of Guam proposed. Even the United Nations is in favor of greater self-determination for Guam and other such territories. Can't you see that USA is purposely keeping Guam as part of its territory, without making it a proper state of America and even giving it the right to vote to voice its opinions? I use "our" to refer to East Asia, not America. If war breaks out in East Asia, it will be millions of Chinese, Japanese and especially Koreans dying, while Americans will still be relatively safe in US mainland. USA is the one sending its warships and military assets halfway across the globe unnecessarily to possibly declare war in Asia. China will not let USA turn peaceful Asia into battleground like the conflicted Middle East and destroy our decades of progress achieved here.
    1
  85. +Crazy Asian Why do you constantly insult me? How is having military bases in South Korea and Japan contribute to "national security"? US soldiers in Okinawa bases sometimes rape the local Okinawans, but the Japanese government can't do anything about it. And there is alot of prostitution going on in US miltary bases in S. Korea, which the S. Koreans do not appreciate. What has this got to do with security of US mainland at all? If Guam is truly US territory, then why aren't Guam citizens allowed to vote for US president, like rest of American states? Its not even considered a commonwealth, like Puerto Rico, so what exactly is Guam, if not a territory held captive by US federal government? Those babies born in Guam may have US passport, but they still lack the ability to participate in US politics through voting. What has me being Chinese got to do with my political views about Guam? Do you discriminate people's political views by their race and their people? Chinese government has made multiple repeated requests for Indian troops to withdraw from our territory. The government has also given India a deadline to act, otherwise, there will be possibly military consequences, such as deployment of more PLA troops, attack helicopters and Multi-Rocket Launcher vehicles to the area. You think our government is like Trump, just deciding to bombard Syria airbase with 59 Tomahawk missiles, just like that? Some Chinese politicians are moving their families out of China, because of pollution issues, or because of corruption crackdown tracing the source of their wealth. It is not simple affair, but regardless, they are still CPC members and are still expected to participate in China's politics.
    1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1