Comments by "神州 Shenzhou" (@Shenzhou.) on "CGTN" channel.

  1. 194
  2. 53
  3. 47
  4. 40
  5. 26
  6. 24
  7. 22
  8. 22
  9. 20
  10. 17
  11. 17
  12. 15
  13. 12
  14. 12
  15. 12
  16. 11
  17. 10
  18. 10
  19. 10
  20. 9
  21. 9
  22. 9
  23. 9
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 9
  27. 8
  28. 8
  29. 8
  30. 8
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 7
  34. 7
  35. 7
  36. 7
  37. 7
  38. 7
  39. 7
  40. 7
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 7
  45. 7
  46. 7
  47. 7
  48. 7
  49. 7
  50. 6
  51. 6
  52. 6
  53. 6
  54. 6
  55. 6
  56. 6
  57. 6
  58. 6
  59. 6
  60. 6
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 6
  66. 5
  67. 5
  68. 5
  69. 5
  70. 5
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81.  @larrysmith2123  After the Korean War, South Korea was actually dirt-poor under democracy with GDP lower than sub-saharan African countries. It was under South Korean dictator, Park Chung-hee that brought prosperity to the South Korea. When he came to power in 1961, South Korea's per capita income was only US$72.00 and North Korea was the greater economic and military power on the peninsula. One of Park's main goals was to end the poverty of South Korea, and lift the country up from being a Third World economy to a First World economy via etatist methods. Using the Soviet Union and its Five Year Plans as a model, Park launched his first Five Year Plan and he is credited with playing a pivotal role in the development of South Korea's tiger economy by shifting its focus to export-oriented industrialisation. Park's policies transformed the impoverished South Korea into prosperity, resulting in Miracle on the Han River (漢江의 奇蹟) but he was a dictator, ruling the country as head of a military dictatorship. In 1972, Park declared martial law and amended the constitution into a highly authoritarian document, tantamount to abolition of the former Constitution. During this time, political opposition and dissent was constantly repressed and Park had complete control of the media and military. In short, South Korea actually prospered under authoritarian South Korean dictator Park, it wasn't because of democracy that South Korea was prosperous. You can read about Park Chung-hee on Wikipedia.
    4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85.  @niyarao2962  Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. @Republic of china,the real china,communist fake Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for over 30 years already?
    4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141.  Supreme  "神州 Shenzhou your views are straight delusional and seem like you are pro ccp almost blindly and to the point you ignore valid criticism." Granted, the Communist Party of China is certainly not perfect (then again which government body truly is?) but despite its initial failures and setbacks, under its leadership, China's population doubled, our lifespans doubled, our literacy rates doubled, and our poverty rates plummeted. Under Chairman Mao Zedong, China's population grew from 540 million in 1949 to 969 million in 1979. China's growth in life expectancy at birth from 35–40 years in 1949 to 65.5 years in 1980 is among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history (Banister and Preston 1981; Ashton et al. 1984; Coale1984; Jamison 1984; Banister 1987; Ravallion 1997; Banister and Hill 2004). This graph shows life-expectencies at birth across China, USA and India. Source: data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=CN-IN-US China was once a dirt-poor, war-torn, starving country similar to India (world's largest democracy) in the past, but today, China has since transformed into world's 2nd largest economy, the world's factory (Made in China) having world's 2nd highest R&D spending, protected by world's largest land army, the People's Liberation Army, funded by world's 2nd highest military expenditure. And it's all been achieved under communist party leadership, despite Western anti-Communist propaganda constantly denouncing China's success all along.
    3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154.  @neil6958  Over 50 years ago, nobody thought that China would ever be successful, or play any important role in global politics, yet look at where China is today? Hong Kong was taken from China by Britain and wasn't fully returned. During the 19th century, the British wanted to continue drinking Chinese tea, but China did not want anything the West had to offer, so Britain waged two bloody wars with China and forced Chinese to buy opium from them at gunpoint, which we didn't want because it made us sick and was poisoning our people. During this weak period of Chinese history, Hong Kong was taken from China and made into British colony, to act as a drug distribution hub to spread the addiction throughout rest of China. Even when Britain renounced ownership over its former territories, Hong Kong was not fully returned back to China, and China had to agree to Sino-British declaration just for Britain to handover what belongs to us. I've already explained the idea behind the Social Credit System, to reward good social behaviour and to penalise bad behaviour. But you Westerners often quote the storybook by Orville, but that's just a work of fiction! The author deliberately exaggerate the negative aspects of technology for entertainment purposes and to attract readership, but it doesn't necessarily mean that reality will follow in its example. Under old Chinese laws, it was legal to harvest organs from prisoners on death row, but only with the express permission of the prisoner or their family members. In my opinion, the criminal is already sentenced to death, so at least the harvested organs will be put to good use saving someone's life, instead of being wasted and rotting away with the body. But since 2014, China has abolished the act of harvesting organs from executed prisoners and China's organ transplant rates are low, and the organ waiting lists are long. Source: The Economist: China ends the practice of harvesting organs from executed prisoners economist.com/graphic-detail/2014/12/30/organ-harvest
    3
  155. 3
  156.  @tomspencer1364  You asked: "What do you do when they start to do an awful job?" Throughout China's 5000 years of history, China has our fair share of tyrant emperors neglecting state affairs and indulging in pleasures while the common people suffered, yet China's authoritarian political system has survived for millenia. Peasants eventually rise up to overthrow the Emperor and the imperial court. But guess what happens next? Another Emperor is eventually installed in power after the uprising, and China's authoritarian political system continues as it has until the modern times. "神州 Shenzhou Did I say the CCP was doing an awful job?" If you support the idea that the Communist Party of China is doing a good job governing China, then we are in agreement. A recent long-term study by Harvard University has revealed that around 80-90% of Chinese citizens support the CPC. Source: Harvard survey finds Chinese satisfaction with govt rises china.org.cn/china/2020-07/17/content_76281590.htm About the exceptionally bad performance of the United States in dealing with Covid-19, I agree that the root of problem probably started decades ago (like you said). But had democracy been "self-correcting" like you said, then you would have rooted out the problem decades ago. This shows that simply changing government doesn't solve the problem at all, you need to change policies, not change governments. In short, in USA, you can change the government, but not the policies. Whereas in China, you can't change the government, but the policies change. Finally, with regards to your last statement, there's no shame in being an elderly person. In Chinese culture, elders are respected, for they are fonts of wisdom, just waiting to impart their knowledge to the new generation.
    3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227.  @tomspencer1364  China's political system has been through immense change. China once tried democracy when Dr. Sun yatsen (Sun Zhongshan) overthrew the Qing Dynasty China in 1911 and established the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949). But back then China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. Next, China tried communism under Mao Zedong and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. But Mao was an excellent strategist, not a good governor and that led to China's failed economic policies. Next China tried Socialism with Chinese Characteristics under Deng Xiaoping which successfully transformed China from a dirt-poor country into an economic juggernaut today. But with economic reform comes political pressure, and it was Deng who ordered the People's Liberation Army into Tiananmen Square. Deng died without ever admitting to sending the PLA to Tiananmen Square. Today, China is following Xi Jinping Thought under President Xi Jinping, and its still too early to tell what's going to happen. The thing is, China's political system is constantly evolving with the times, whereas in USA, the U.S constitution has remained unchanged for 150 years.
    2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235.  @shambhutekar5797  You said: "China even announced a tariff exemption for 97% of exports from Bangladesh." Isn't that a good thing for Bangladesh? Currently, 3095 Bangladeshi products enjoy duty-free access to Chinese market under Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA). With the new announcement, 97% of Bangladeshi products will join this zero-tariff club from July 1 that raised the numbers of Bangladeshi products with zero duty access to Chinese market to 8,256. You said: "The Maldivian Government leased out Islands of Feydhoo Finolhuto China until 2066 for $4 million." The islands are leased for Chinese companies to develop into a tourist resort. According to Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, the Feydhoo Finolhu resort appears largely complete as of August 2020, but the wharf is modest and seems intended for civilian vessels, presumably ferrying guests who fly in to nearby Male. Small villas line the shore all around the island, while the only larger buildings are the small cluster near the harbor. These are presumably the administrative buildings and shops for the resort. And dozens of bungalows line piers over the reef itself. The island has even been planted with small groves of palm trees. And there is very little room left to build anything else, whether civilian or military. All in all, Feydhoo Finolhu has every indication of being a commercial resort. And in 2066, the 50-year lease would expire, the Feydhoo Finolhu island would be returned to Maldives. So doesn't Maldives stand to benefit in the long run? You said: "Sri Lanka meltdown exposes China loan policy" I already pointed out that China only makes up 10% of Sri Lanka's foreign debt, the remaining 90% comes mostly from the West, Japan and India, yet you're blaming China for Sri Lanka's woes?
    2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270.  @engr_rioja  Tibetans themselves signed the Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet (中央人民政府和西藏地方政府关于和平解放西藏办法的协议) for short in 1952, affirming Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. So there is legal document binding Tibet to China isn't it? Previously, while Tibet was under Dalai Lama rule, Tibet was a brutal theocracy, where 95% of the population were slaves and the remaining 5% elites were slave owners. Tibetan mountainous soil is infertile, rainfall is scarce in the Himalayas, so the slaves had to work hard to feed the Tibetan population. Starvation was commonplace and theft of food was punished by torture, amputation and even skinning. There's this Tibetan drum called damaru that's made from human skulls, a drumskin made of human skin and drumstick made of human bone. The Dalai Lama was overly worshipped and his followers fought for the right to consume his saliva, his urine and even his feces, because he was considered a divine vessel. After Tibet returned back to China, Chinese workers began rapidly modernising Tibet, building roads, railways, streetlamps, running water, gas and electricity as well as introducing modern amenities like cars, computers, telephone cables, smartphones, the Internet, WiFi, online shopping (from Taobao) and so on. Under CCP, the first Tibetan colleges opened in Lhasa, offering degrees in both Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese languages. Hydroelectric powerstations were built by Chinese to supply Tibetan homes with electricity. Source: List of universities and colleges in Tibet wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_and_colleges_in_Tibet Source: List of major power stations in the Tibet Autonomous Region wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_major_power_stations_in_the_Tibet_Autonomous_Region Chinese workers built the Qinghai-Lhasa railway (world's highest elevation railway) through dangerous mountainous terrain and low oxygen environments, to connect the normally isolated Tibet with the rest of the world. Tibet can now import food from the mainland to feed its population, and Tibet's population has tripled from 1 million in 1950s to over 3 million people today. A thriving tourist industry has even sprung up in Tibet.
    1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. @ForrestSCS Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One. ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western journalists predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for 31 years already?
    1
  310. @ForrestSCS If you want to look at history, China has 5,000 years of history and is among the world's oldest "continuous" civilization still alive today, whereas other ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Rome and Egypt have since succumbed to history. China has witnessed the birth and death of various other nations, the rise and fall of numerous other empires, yet China has survived the violent passage of time to modern times relatively intact, whereas even Rome eventually crumbled. China has always been under the authoritarian rule (and we still are today) of emperors and the imperial court, because that's how China has been successfully governed for millennia. Not all countries have to adopt Western democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this. Because this is what China's 5,000 years of history is telling us, that China functions best under a strong central government, like the Emperor and the Imperial Court of old. China's current authoritarian political closely emulates the ancient imperial system under President Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China. And go and read Taiwan's own constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China. Taiwan claims all of mainland China (including Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, etc) as part of their territory, including territory currently under the control of Mongolia, Burma (Myanmar), Bhutan, India, Japan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan. Here's a Map of all the territory Taiwan claims (source:wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ROC_Administrative_and_Claims.svg ) Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution.
    1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334.  @kushio214  So you can compare GDP per capita (by dividing our GDP by our enormous population) then can't I use China's population to our advantage? Chinese universities produce the most STEM graduates (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) out of any other country in the world. Countries With The Most STEM Graduates 1. China (4.7 million) 2. India (2.6 million) 3. United States (568,000) 4. Russia (561,000) 5. Iran (335,000) 6. Indonesia (206,000) 7. Japan (195,000) ... Source: Forbes: The Countries With The Most STEM Graduates forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2017/02/02/the-countries-with-the-most-stem-graduates-infographic/ This implies that China is going to play a much larger role in the STEM fields, given the sheer number of graduates produced in these fields. In the grand scheme of things, China is only going to get better and better over the years. The HDI also compares two countries with the same level of GDP per capita that can end up with different human development outcomes, so isn't it linked to population size as well? Lastly, if you think that Japan or Taiwan could have built even longer train lines if they were the size of mainland China, then it's possible that their GDP per capita and HDI won't be as high as they are today, because of the sheer size of China's landmass. In 2003, China had 0km of high speed rail track, but today, China has more than double the track length of the rest of the world! Countries by high-speed rail lines in operation 1. China (38,207 km) 2. Spain (5,525 km) 3. Germany (4,692 km) 4. France (3,802 km) 5. Japan (3,421 km) 6. Sweden (2,055 km) 7. United Kingdom (1,757 km) ... Source: List of high-speed railway lines wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_high-speed_railway_lines#Overview
    1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445.  Ash Xi  During Unit 731, Japanese scientists conducted inhuman experiments on Chinese prisoners, including men, women and children. Prisoners were infected with various diseases and then subjected to live vivisection, often without anesthesia. Scientists performed invasive surgeries, organs were removed, limbs amputated and then reattached to opposite sides of the body, all while the subject is alive. Some prisoners even had their stomachs removed and their esophagus reattached to the intestines, presumably to measure how long humans can survive without the stomach. The women had it worst during Unit 731. Prisoners were injected with sexually transmitted diseases and then forced at gunpoint to spread the infection to other prisoners. Women were gangaped and impregnated (sometimes by Japanese themselves) and then vivisected at various stages of their pregnancy to study the effects of diseases on their organs or on the fetus. Some Japanese scientists even gangaped female prisoners and then had experiments conducted on unborn children they fathered with female prisoners there. Imagine if you are woman prisoner in Unit 731. Or you are a man injected with STD and then forced at gunpoint to have sex to spread it to other prisoners? Why not simply inject everyone with STD, instead of forcing prisoners to spread STD by sex? Or imagine having your limbs amputated and reattached to opposite sides of your body, all without anastasia. All Chinese people wanted was to defend our homes and protect our loved ones, but the Japanese invaded our lands, stole our territory, killed our men, gangaped our women and perform inhuman experiments on our childrens.
    1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493.  @violatedmonkey  About the gag orders on doctors, that happened after China already had informed the World Health Organization of a mysterious pneumonia like illness on 31st Dec 2019, so what's your point when countries had already been informed about the virus? And buying up global PPE, China was in urgent need of PPE, and your countries choose to put up your PPE for sale, then why can't Chinese fork out money to buy PPE? Your countries put PPE up for sale, so Chinese people bought them and shipped them back to China because China urgently needed PPE at that time. In fact, before 2019, your PPE was Made-In-China and Chinese people are buying back PPE that was previously produced in China. And about selling inferior products back to the world, China was swamped by huge global demand for PPE, and China's production couldn't keep up with the demand so the quality of PPE suffered as a result. Some smaller companies in China also set up factories to cater to the demand, but they had no previous experience making PPE, and their qualifications had not been approved by the government, but other countries already made the purchase of PPE without informing Chinese government of the transaction. About human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus, there was no confirmation of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 back in 2019. Human-to-human transmission was confirmed on 21 Jan 2020, and that's when the government began locking down Wuhan shortly after this discovery. Video: China confirms human-to-human transmission of new coronavirus youtu.be/XPbdMRXQhdE (Dated to 21 Jan 2020) About international travel, except for chartered flights, no international passenger flights have departed from Wuhan since its lockdown on January 23, according to the Hubei Airport Group Company.
    1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. @Monke Westerners have long been predicting China's economic downfall. Here's a list: 1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt. 1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing. 1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth. 1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. 2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. 2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China. 2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing. 2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China.. 2004. The Economist: The great fall of China? 2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. 2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? 2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing? 2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China? 2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. 2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China. 2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think. 2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing. 2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China. 2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China. 2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing.... 2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China. 2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash? 2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown. 2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019 ... But its already 2021, and China's economy is still going strong. So why continue to believe China's economy will fall, given that Western economist predictions about China's collapse been proven consistently wrong for almost 30 years already?
    1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577.  @praisethelegendarymessiahs2617  The Chinese political system is very similar to Singapore's political system. Look, there were literally no elections held for Singapore President Halima Yacob (that's why you failed to tell me the latest Singapore Presidential poll results, because there were none) yet you complain about no freely elected national leaders in China? Singapore's opposition is literally a joke, they exist to make the PAP look good that's all, so the Singapore people vote for the PAP, and it's dominance is such that Singapore is effectively a one-party state, having been under authoritarian PAP rule for 56 years (their whole life as a nation) similar to China being under Communist Party of China (CPC) rule for 72 years. Singapore government also controls all religious activity, you have to apply for government permit. For example, in Singapore, all religious foot processions are banned and this ban was imposed in 1964, after riots. Go ahead and just try to remove the PAP from power. The PAP has several tools at their disposal to get rid of Singaporean dissenters and political rivals. Haven't you heard of Singapore dissident Francis Seow being arrested by Lee Kuan Yew? According to Human Rights Watch: Singapore Singapore’s political environment is overwhelmingly repressive. Citizens face severe restrictions on free expression, association, and peaceful assembly through overly broad criminal laws and regulations. The government has aggressively enforced a sweeping “online falsehoods” law that permits government ministers to order the “correction” or removal of online content. As for China, the National People's Congress (NPC) elects the President of the People's Republic of China and the Vice President of the People's Republic of China. The NPC also appoints several governmental executives like the Premier of the State Council and many other crucial officials to the central state organs. The NPC has the power to remove the above-mentioned officials from the office.
    1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1