Comments by "神州 Shenzhou" (@Shenzhou.) on "Why Most Foreigners Can't Understand China" video.

  1. 580
  2. 58
  3. 50
  4. 40
  5. 32
  6. 23
  7. 20
  8. 17
  9. 16
  10. 13
  11. 12
  12. 12
  13. 11
  14. 10
  15. 9
  16. 9
  17. 9
  18. 9
  19. 8
  20. 8
  21. 8
  22. 7
  23. 7
  24. 6
  25. 6
  26.  @MarkYeung1  It's your own personal choice who you believe. According to my Jay Matthews source: Probably the most widely disseminated account appeared first in the Hong Kong press: a Qinghua University student described machine guns mowing down students in front of the Monument to the People’s Heroes in the middle of the square. The New York Times gave this version prominent display on June 12, just a week after the event, but no evidence was ever found to confirm the account or verify the existence of the alleged witness. Student leader Wu’er Kaixi said he had seen 200 students cut down by gunfire, but it was later proven that he left the square several hours before the events he described allegedly occurred. (So how could Wu’er Kaixi have seen those 200 students cut down by gunfire, when he left the square several hours before?) CBS correspondent Richard Roth’s story of being arrested and removed from the scene refers to “powerful bursts of automatic weapons, raging gunfire for a minute and a half that lasts as long as a nightmare.” Black and Munro quote a Chinese eyewitness who says the gunfire was from army commandos shooting out the student loudspeakers at the top of the monument. (So it was PLA commandos shooting at student's loudspeakers, not at the students themselves.) A BBC reporter watching from a high floor of the Beijing Hotel said he saw soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the center of the square. But as the many journalists who tried to watch the action from that relatively safe vantage point can attest, the middle of the square is not visible from the hotel. (So how could he have witness the shooting at the monument, when it wasn't visible from his vantage point?)
    6
  27. 6
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 4
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49.  @kirakamu9246  Chairman Mao Zedong is the founding father of the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳. Mao and the communists had succeeded in reunifying our divided country, where the previous Nationalist Kuomintang failed under the Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) for 37 years. It was during Chinese Civil War, so of course Chinese were killing Chinese. Just like during the American Civil War, Americans were killing Americans. Or Vietnamese killing Vietnamese during Vietnam War. Or Koreans during Korean War or any civil war for that matter. When Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today.
    2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158.  @nicholaslee5473  Because those Chinese research articles have obviously been translated into English in the Institute for Scientific Information in order to be understood by Western scientists. However, everyone knows that during the process of translating from one language to another, some expressions or meanings may be loss through translation. As for the high quantity of publications, China is a relative new-comer to the scientific publications industry. The reason the Chinese government incentivised publications to produce quantity over quality is to build up our initial base. Our scientists started publishing literally from scratch, so publishing huge quantities of papers is needed to gain experience and build up our foundation, of which we can work on to improve on quality publication later. This is the strategy adopted by China to rise in the scientific research fields. …… You said: "This is the classical example of China being China. The global scientific community shares research which is why they use English as a medium." This is where the Western "racist" mindset kicks in. The reason why the Western countries are able to maintain their dominance in the scientific fields, is because they force other non-English speaking countries to adhere to using English in their publications. China is under no obligation to use English for our scientific publications, if Western scientists want access to Chinese papers, then they'll have to learn Chinese in order to fully comprehend the concepts, ideas and terminologies being discussed among Chinese scientists. …… You said: "Publishing it in Mandarin is not an efficient way for technological progress at all for the global scientific community. It's a hoarding behavior and while it may make it easier for scientists in China, it's incompatibility with the world's journals make it even less accurate." I disagree with this accessment. A non-English speaking scientist is more comfortable with his/her own native language, and it may not be efficient for the scientist to communicate concepts and ideas if forced to use only English terminologies. Your statement suggests that non-English speaking countries need to bow down to the power of the West in the scientific fields. And I also disagree that just because Chinese journals may not be compatible with Western journals doesn't imply our publication is inaccurate. China is building up a baseline of scientific publications of our own (like you said earlier) and while it is true that currently it is more quantity than quality, our repository of research publications is only going to improve as time goes by, until hopefully it will become an acceptable and reliable pillar of Chinese scientific publications. …… You said: "Scientific research journals need citations and references from other works, if you are only able to publish in Chinese, you lose a lot of revelant sources which are not in Chinese." This is where the repository of Chinese publications comes into players. Right now the baseline is more quantity than quality like you said, but it's expected to improve with time. I also think Western countries are perhaps a little too obsessed with citations, so much such that the practical applications of their papers are oftentimes overlooked. In the West, researchers often have to worry about funding, so they write papers and cite other peoples work to improve their credibility, so that they can expand their academic circles, get approval of grants so that they can publish more papers. It has degenerated into an academic system and many researcher's ideas remain on paper, instead of being turned into actual products. Whereas in China, research funds are available at all tiers of society, from corporate to government sector, and a struggling research can easily get a $40,000 funding approval, thus freeing the researcher to concentrate on his/her research instead of having to worry about funding. The idea-to-product transition time in China is short too, so many researchers can feel a sense of satisfaction, witnessing their ideas being turned to actual products. …… Lastly, while China may be cutting funding to poor publications, China's R&D expenditure ranks 2nd in the world after the USA. Here is a list of countries by R&D spending. Countries by R&D Spending 1. United States ($612.714 billion) 2. China ($514.798 billion) 3. Japan ($172.614 billion) 4. Germany ($131.932 billion) 5. South Korea ($100.055 billion) 6. France ($63.658 billion) 7. India ($58.691 billion) 8. United Kingdom ($51.702 billion) …… Source:wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_and_development_spending#List
    1
  159.  @nicholaslee5473  Because Hollywood is driven by making profit in the Chinese movie market, that China can exert influence on Hollywood. For example, making them partner up with local Chinese film companies to co-produce films, possibly casting more Chinese/Asian actors and actresses in order to cater to Chinese audience's tastes, and to allow Asian actors/actresses to gain valuable acting experience and to become more visible in the market. In alien movies, fChinese/Asians are humans* too, the Americans see no problem with casting African Americans (i.e Will Smith in Independence Day) in alien flicks, then why not Asian Americans? …… You said: "African Americans are well-represented because they are Americans." Correct, but so are Asian Americans! Why do many Americans seem to forget that Asian Americans are also Americans? This is part of the perpetual foreigner stereotype that plagues Asian American society, because even though many of them are born in America, went to the same schools as other Americans, yet they are treated like outsiders that don't belong. Source: Perpetual foreigner wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_foreigner Hollywood is indeed experiencing a change because of China. The thing is that Hollywood consistently denies Asian actors/actresses roles in which where a character of Asian descent is played by a Caucasian actor/actress instead. For example, in the Hollywood the Ghost in the Shell movie, the protagonist, major Motoko Kusanagi is played by Caucasian actress Scarlett Johnson. Or the Ancient One of Doctor Strange movie was supposed to be of Tibetan descent, but was casted by Caucasian actress Tilda Swinton and this phenomena is known as white-washing. These are missed opportunities for Asian actors/actresses to get some much needed acting experience to improve their portfolios. The problem with stereotypes is that sometimes they can overwhelm. Even martial arts (which I also embraced as a defining feature of Chinese culture) can backfire, because Asian actors are complaining about how many Hollywood directors expect Asian actors to automatically "know Kung Fu" and to perform martial arts without a background in it. There are rare Hollywood movies where a Chinese/Asian actor takes the male lead, but oftentimes the romance is missing. Like Shanghai Noon, the kissing scenes were by Owen Wilson not Jackie Chan, it's this subtle attempt by Hollywood to paint Asians (especially men) as unattractive. Lastly, yes I agree that it takes skill for Asian actors to portray their roles convincingly. However, in an industry where Asian roles are white-washing, then how do people expect Asians to gain the necessary acting skills and acting experience, if denied the opportunity to shine and increase their exposure? This is the lack of Asian representation plaguing Hollywood today. Hopefully, China's movie market will influence Hollywood to cast more Asian actors/actresses to the give them greater opportunities to shine and gain valuable experience.
    1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162.  @nicholaslee5473  I read your source and it says: Most scientific journals in China are not published in English, which has meant that much of current scientific development in China is not readily available to non–Chinese-speaking scientists. A large portion of these journals however, also have an abstract in English. It's not racist to use English language yes. But it is racist to think that China needs to be forced to adopt the use of English language in our scientific publications, just to contribute to global scientific advancements. English may be the lingua fraca of the 19th and 20th century, but that does not guarantee that it will be always be so, for the 21st century and beyond. And I never said that I'm forcing others towards use Chinese, I'm saying that "if Western scientists want access to Chinese papers, then they'll have to learn Chinese in order to fully comprehend the concepts, ideas and terminologies being discussed among Chinese scientists." I disagree that English was just adopted because it was easier to learn. When I first started learning English, I was confused by its grammatical rules (some that don't make sense) and the sheer volume of vocabulary that needed to be learned. Just take the days of the week for example and in English, it's Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday. But in Chinese it's just 星期一,星期二,星期三,星期四,星期五,星期六,星期天。(i.e Weekday 1, Weekday 2, Weekday 3, Weekday 4, ……) so if you know how to count in Chinese, then it's much easier rather memorising new words like Monday, Wednesday, etc. Even learning the months of the year like January, February, March, April, etc is another memorization headache for new English learners. Whereas in Chinese, the months are 一月,二月,三月, etc (i.e 1st Month, 2nd Month, 3rd Month, etc) About "China being China," China is charting our own path forward, then what's wrong with China following a path different from Western countries? It's no secret today that America is in decline, and China is rising. The trajectories are pretty much set and many economists firmly believe China's economy is expected to surpass the United State's economy sometime in the foreseeable future. If China can achieve this, then what's wrong with our "displays of power"? China is currently at peace and not at war with any country, since our last major conflict in 1979. Instead of making war, China is building infrastructure like roads, railways, highways, bridges, tunnels, powerstations, dams, ports, airports, etc and investing in developing countries like Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and also African countries like Nigeria, Kenya, Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Mozambique, Tanzania, etc. Whereas the United States is warmonger being involved in Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghan War, Libyan War, Syrian War, Yemen War, etc, even in the 21st century. USA is bombing in those Middle Eastern countries and enacting regime change by cutting off their "heads" (Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, etc) and then installing their own US puppet governments in place. Video: U.S. should focus more on infrastructure rather than warmongering youtu.be/LyhK2PQyE_w Scientists work best in their native languages, what if scientists being forced to use a non-familiar language (like English) is what's hampering actual scientific progress? About whether the information is less impactful globally, it depends on how quickly that scientific research can be put to use in actual applications, such as through tangible products or services. China has the advantage of a short idea-to-product transition time, especially if you come to Shenzhen the scientist's ideas get transformed into applications fast. I believe that my statement that "China is under no obligation to use English for our scientific publications." still stands. The main reason why English dominates the sciences is because many other non-English speaking countries are unable to develop their scientific vocabulary and terminologies to explain the scientific concepts in their native languages. That's why the English language continues to dominate the sciences. As a new-comer to modern scientific publishing, China is building our scientific base and developing our own scientific vocabulary to be on par with English scientific vocabulary someday.
    1
  163.  @abbotsful  Currently, Hollywood casting Asian Americans doesn't cater to Chinese markets, because most of the Asian American actors/actresses are largely unknown to mainland China, and yes more mainland Chinese are familiar with our own actors/actresses than Asian Americans. It's because of the lack of exposure of Asian American actors in Hollywood film industries, that's why Chinese audiences are often unfamiliar with them. Asian Americans are also Americans too, and they have served in US military (3.7% as you said). It is improbable yes, but not impossible, and there have been numerous African Americans actors in Hollywood as well as Latino actors. A movie is a play that serves to entertain, but for actors and actresses, it's their lifeline and being casted in a movie increases their chances of catapulting into fame. I agree that at the current state, Asian Americans actors/actresses aren't as familiar a face as mainland Chinese actors/actresses, because of lack of exposure. You mentioned that putting mainland Chinese actors/actresses in lead roles feels out of context if they are not American, but why does Hollywood neglect to cast Asian Americans actors/actresses, who are there clearly to serve as a balance between American culture and Asian culture? The problem with Hollywood is that the lack of exposure of Asian Americans actors/actresses is devolving into a never ending cycle. Asian Americans who lack acting skills and experience aren't being casted. Yet at the same time, they need to be casted in more diverse roles to improve their acting skills and gain experience, so it becomes a never-ending cycle to keep Asian Americans actors/actress in a low profile. About Shanghai Noon, I thought it was an American movie, not a Chinese movie. The audience is expected to be American not Chinese, so why would Jackie Chan's role as an imperial guard frolicking with the emperor's daughter, outrage the audience? Hollywood is American yes, but America is home to many people of different races, including Asian Americans, yet cultural stereotypes about the "perpetual foreigner" still persist in USA and the opportunities for Asian actors in Hollywood are extremely limited. Only 5% of characters in 2017's top 100 grossing films were of Asian descent, with just 4 of the movies featuring an Asian lead character. And 37 of those Top 100 movies has no Asian actors at all. Video: Hollywood’s Asian Problem youtu.be/0L6IRJExiG0 Asian American actors/actresses need more exposure and to be casted in more roles to gain acting skills and experience. But few directors are willing to cast them in roles because they have little to no acting skills and experience. This is the problem plaguing Asian American actors in Hollywood.
    1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166.  @nicholaslee5473  According to your source: Most scientific journals in China are published in Chinese; a few have English translations of abstracts for research articles. Some 189 scientific journals are published in English, of which 29 are health-science journals. Most articles published in English-language scientific journals in China are indexed by Science Citation Index and Engineering Index. I never said that it's racist to use a single language to contribute to easier understanding of the world, I said that it is racist to think China needs to be forced to adopt the use of English language in our scientific publications, just to contribute to global scientific advancements. The reasons why many other non-English speaking countries are unable to fully develop their own scientific terminologies and vocabulary is because they use English language to explain scientific terms which deprives their own native language the opportunity to grow and evolve with science. In China, by publishing research articles in Chinese, our scientists are growing their scientific vocabulary in the process and expanding the use of Chinese in science. A simple poll or survey in English will obviously favor English as an easy language to learn, if conducted in English-speaking countries. But you if you approach this from a non-Native English speaker then it becomes difficult to learn. According to Oxford Royale Academy: Why Is English So Hard to Learn? oxford-royale.com/articles/learning-english-hard/ It’s often said that English is one of the hardest languages to learn. Given the fact that many of the words we use in English stem from Latin and Ancient Greek words – in common with many other European languages – what is it about English that has attracted this reputation for being so fearsomely difficult? It’s often said that English is one of the hardest languages to learn. Given the fact that many of the words we use in English stem from Latin and Ancient Greek words – in common with many other European languages – what is it about English that has attracted this reputation for being so fearsomely difficult? There's so much more about English that makes it difficult than just the 7 days of the week or the 12 months of the year. You said: "Chinese language has a unique sound for every word to ever exist." but this is untrue, at least in the case of Mandarin. Chinese has many homophones where the words sound the same, such as 由于/鱿鱼 (because/squid) 丫头/鸭头 (girl/duck head) and so on. Learning the sound of 26 English alphabets doesn't automatically guarantee that you can pronounce anything, but once you learned how to pronounce Chinese tones, they are repeated for different words that sound the same, there no real need to "learn a new sound." And even if you could pronounce an English word, you'll still have to memorise it's meaning to understand what the word means. Like memorising "Wednesday is the third day of the Week" or "September is the ninth month", it's basically the same memorising as Chinese characters, except that you can often derive meaning from Chinese characters. However, with the various combinations of 26 alphabets lead to a huge vocabulary of English words. As far as I know, China is not intentionally hoarding research, our scientists prefer to express themselves in their preferred form of language that's all and Chinese articles are available in Chinese to any scientists that wants to peruse them, so why are you accusing China of intentionally hoarding research? I agree that it's easier to start from something (if you know the language). But by starting from something it means that over time, you'll become overdependent on that source. Say for instance, USA decides to one day cut off China's access to scientific journals, then we will be in trouble had China chosen to be over reliant on US scientific publications.
    1
  167. 1
  168.  @nicholaslee5473  Currently, Hollywood casting Asian Americans doesn't cater to Chinese markets, because most of the Asian American actors/actresses are largely unknown to mainland China, and yes more mainland Chinese are familiar with our own actors/actresses than Asian Americans. It's because of the lack of exposure of Asian American actors in Hollywood film industries, that's why Chinese audiences are often unfamiliar with them. Asian Americans are also Americans too, and they have served in US military (3.7% as you said). It is improbable yes, but not impossible, and there have been numerous African Americans actors in Hollywood as well as Latino actors. A movie is a play that serves to entertain, but for actors and actresses, it's their lifeline and being casted in a movie increases their chances of catapulting into fame. I agree that at the current state, Asian Americans actors/actresses aren't as familiar a face as mainland Chinese actors/actresses, because of lack of exposure. You mentioned that putting mainland Chinese actors/actresses in lead roles feels out of context if they are not American, but why does Hollywood neglect to cast Asian Americans actors/actresses, who are there clearly to serve as a balance between American culture and Asian culture? The problem with Hollywood is that the lack of exposure of Asian Americans actors/actresses is devolving into a never ending cycle. Asian Americans who lack acting skills and experience aren't being casted. Yet at the same time, they need to be casted in more diverse roles to improve their acting skills and gain experience, so it becomes a never-ending cycle to keep Asian Americans actors/actress in a low profile. About Shanghai Noon, I thought it was an American movie, not a Chinese movie. The audience is expected to be American not Chinese, so why would Jackie Chan's role as an imperial guard frolicking with the emperor's daughter, outrage the audience? Hollywood is American yes, but America is home to many people of different races, including Asian Americans, yet cultural stereotypes about the "perpetual foreigner" still persist in USA and the opportunities for Asian actors in Hollywood are extremely limited. Only 5% of characters in 2017's top 100 grossing films were of Asian descent, with just 4 of the movies featuring an Asian lead character. And 37 of those Top 100 movies has no Asian actors at all. Video: Hollywood’s Asian Problem youtu.be/0L6IRJExiG0 Asian American actors/actresses need more exposure and to be casted in more roles to gain acting skills and experience. But few directors are willing to cast them in roles because they have little to no acting skills and experience. This is the problem plaguing Asian American actors in Hollywood.
    1
  169.  @nicholaslee5473  You said: "China's war is with the U.S." China does not want war, but that does not mean that China is afraid of war. Western countries' MSM are constantly painting China in a negative light and "demonising" our country, that's why China has no choice but to take necessary defensive measures. For example, Trump's tariffs and US sanctions on China is the US attempt to contain China's rise. American chips are banned from being used in China and Chinese companies like Huawei are banned in USA, others like Tik Tok (by Bytedance) and WeChat are being targeted, so possibly the same thing could happen when USA tries to lock China out of scientific publications. That's why China needs to take the necessary precautions against such possible actions, and to build up our scientific publications database of our own. Once again, I would like to reiterate that China does not hoard research, our scientific articles are clearly available in Chinese language for perusal by scientists and it is racist to think that China should alter our scientific publications to be in English. China is under no obligation to use English for scientific publications. While English was the lingua fraca of the 19th and 20th century, there is no guarantee that it will remain so for the 21st century and beyond. The English language was able to dominate the world through 19th century British colonialism as well as the 20th century United States emergence as a world superpower, but for the 21st century, it is forecasted to be an "Asian century" with the rise of China. It's true that currently, the English scientific database is strong and reliable with centuries of scientific work and China is a relative new-comer to the scene, however this may not always be the case in the future, as China builds upon our own scientific research database. I believe that although it's initially disadvantageous in the short term, the benefits of China's scientific research will eventually pay off in the long term, and China needs to take necessary defensive measures to guard against the US attempt to contain our rise. China has world's 2nd largest military spending, I agree, but impressive as it is, it still pales in comparison to the number 1 military spending in the world, the USA's. USA spends more money on defense than the next 10 countries' combined. List of countries by military expenditures 1. United States ($778.0 billion) 2. China ($253 billion) 3. India ($72.9 billion) 4. Russian Federation ($61.7 billion) 5. United Kingdom ($59.2 billion) 6. Saudi Arabia ($57.5 billion) 7. Germany ($52.8 billion) 8. France ($52.7 billion) 9. Japan ($49.1 billion) 10. South Korea ($45.7 billion) …… Source: List of countries by military expenditures wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures#Total_military_spending Indeed, China suffered under the Century of Humiliation (百年国耻) when Western powers invaded China and plundered our cultural artefacts (many of which are now on display in Western museums) and that's the driving force behind the "Chinese Dream" (中国梦) of the eventual rejuvenation of Chinese civilization. However, China does not seek to visit the atrocities commited on China onto the rest of the world. China doesn't seek revenge on the West per say, only to restore our country back to it's former glory before the 19th century Opium Wars. Looking at Chinese history, even at the height of China's power (say during the Ming Dynasty) China did not seek to colonise places that weren't previously under Han control. Ming Dynasty naval forces were among the most advanced of it's time and Admiral Zheng He 郑和 led a fleet of ships through seven voyages throughout the Indian Ocean, visiting Africa, India and the Middle East. However it was a peaceful merchant armada to trade with other countries, not conquer them like what the Western colonial powers did centuries later. Video: Crash Course History: Zheng He youtu.be/NjEGncridoQ?t=126 Given China's relatively peaceful nature during the height of Chinese civilization, I am inclined to think that China intends to preserve this peaceful form of coexistence if China becomes number one in the future. The question is not whether China will rise peaceful, it is whether China will be allowed to rise peacefully.
    1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174.  @abbotsful  What about those PLA Chinese soldiers getting burned alive because supposedly "peaceful" protestors threw petrol bombs and ignited military trucks and tanks? What about the PLA soldiers who refused to open fire, but got mobbed by unarmed "protestors" and had their rifles stolen and fired against them? Had the Chinese government not taken firm action at that time, then chaos would have erupted, possibly plunging China into civil strife and wiping away decades of peace and progress in our country. So clearly, China made the difficult but necessary decision at that time to ensure that stability returned to China and many people in China have since moved on from 1989. But many Westerners constantly want to return to 1989 because they don't want to wake up to a reality where China is faring well under the communist party leadership. I mean, what happened has happened, and time has shown that Chinese government made the right call, we are more prosperous today under the CPC, than any previous time in Chinese history. I have read many of your previous comments and come to the conclusion that you don't really care about China, except to criticize China maliciously. I mean, for what other reason do you constantly return to an event that most people in China have since moved on? People like you refuse to move on, because you're unable to accept the fact that Chinese government has since learnt valuable lessons from previous mistakes and take the necessary steps not to repeat them.
    1
  175.  @abbotsful  You barely register any interest in China's positive achievements, look at your responses here and it's mostly just one-liners about China's achievements. Even your comment about computers was previously mentioned by me. About poverty in China, according to the World Bank, China's poverty rate fell from 88% in 1981 to a mere 0.7% in 2015. According to UNESCO, adult literacy rate in China increased from 65.5% in 1982 to a whopping 96.4% in 2015. This is an impressive feat considering that China is world's most populous country, yet attaining 0.7% poverty and 96.4% literacy. Source: Poverty in China wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_China Source: Statista Adult literacy in China 1982-2015 statista.com/statistics/271336/literacy-in-china …… I really don't understand what's your problem with whether I'm born late or not. You clearly stated earlier that you had "no problem" then why do you keep on bringing up whether I was born or not? And again, how did I buy up the "lies that covered it up" when I quoted Western sources like Jay Matthews and Gregory Clark? I never quoted anything regarding the Communist Party with regards to 1989, so why do you keep on claiming that "it's the history written by the party that you believe"? The Chinese government had been negotiating with the student protesters for months who said there was no negotiation? What makes you think a bunch of students (who haven't even graduated, find a job, get married, settle etc) would know how to govern China better than the Chinese government? Here's a video of Tiananmen Square negotiation between Deng Xiaoping with student protesters. (video:youtu.be/qPjwDXohuys ) The students were brash and aggressive, making unreasonable demands of Deng, to which Deng calmly refuted. …… Lastly, you yourself admitted that "it's true that you used to think that 1000s of students had been killed inside the square and that mass media has been lazy, possibly intentionally biased in their reporting". This is ironic, because earlier you repeatedly accused me of being born late and being fooled by the "history written by the party" but here you are, being born early (I assume, since you assumed I was born late) yet you were fooled by biased Western reporting of thousands of students killed inside Tiananmen Square. Can't you see how you've been fooled by Western reporting of Tiananmen Square, yet you accused me of being fooled by the history supposedly written by the communist party?
    1
  176.  @nicholaslee5473  Even for the average Joe in America, who doesn't want to spend time in China or work here, it still pays to learn about China, because China is rising and going to play a bigger role about future affairs. Yet many Americans aren't interested in learning about other countries outside of America. Chinese Americans are American born and generations past true, but they have a link to China, whereas your average non-Chinese American has absolutely no heritage link to China whatsoever. More mainland Chinese are able to identify with a Chinese American, rather than a non-Chinese American. Yes it takes time to get to know new faces but all it takes is more exposure that's all. On one hand, you claim Hollywood needs China's box office so they cast mainland Chinese actors. On the other hand, you claim Hollywood putting people like these in lead roles is a problem because they are not American and would be very out of context if they were in the lead roles. So the solution is simple, just cast Asian American actors since they are Americans after all. Culture stereotypes is difficult to counter yes, but if you don't start somewhere, then it will never be countered. Hollywood has certainly been inclusive for African American and Latino American actors/actresses, but the same can't be said for Asian Americans. If Asians aren't being cast because of lack of acting skills or experience, then how are they going to gain acting skills and experience if they don't get cast? Video: Only 3 Asian Actors Have Won An Oscar...Ever youtu.be/0YZV8J_0nCw
    1
  177. 1
  178.  @abbotsful  You have never been nice to me, you constantly accused me of "believing the history written by the party" even though I clearly cited Western sources, then why should I be nice to you? The truth is that you don't really care China, except to criticise China maliciously. I don't understand, why is it that you can bring up China's achievements in computing, then why is it when I do the same, it's being labelled as "China is awesome facts to throw at laowai"? Why can't I bring up positive achievements about China? Besides supercomputers, Chinese scientists also built quantum computing machine that is 24,000 times faster than international counterparts and 10-100 times faster than the first electronic computer, ENIAC. Source: World's First Quantum Computer Made By China fossbytes.com/worlds-first-quantum-computer-made-by-china/ The quantum computer is built by a team of Chinese scientists working at the University of Science and Technology of China, at Hefei in Anhui province. The researchers believe that quantum computing could excel the processing power of supercomputers. Pan Jianwei, a quantum physicist, and an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said that quantum computing makes use of quantum superposition principle for ultra-fast parallel calculation and simulation capabilities. …… Most Chinese have since moved on from 1989. But if you agree with me that no one died that night in Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, then at least we are in agreement in this area. Do you? And my sources are from the West, like Matthews and Clark, then what makes you claim that it's from the Communist Party of China? The student protesters have been negotiating with the Chinese government for months since April till June 1989, so what other options are there? Again, what makes you think a bunch of university undergraduates somehow know the best way to govern China over the Chinese government? You outwardly admitted that you have been previously fooled by Western media claims of 1000s of deaths inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, it was actually thanks to me bringing up these issues to show that Tiananmen Square Massacre was a Myth. Yet you still make the assumption just because that "I'm born late" and "I wasn't alive at that time" that you somehow knew better than me? You didn't know that Tiananmen Square Massacre is a Myth until I brought up this discussion after all, what's your point whether I was alive at that time or not? You were fooled by Western media into believing the Tiananmen Square Massacre myth after all, yet you look down on me because I was born late? You really never said anything nice to me, then why should I be nice to you? All this time, you've been looking down on me, then why should I look up to you? I'm the one literally educating you that there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square Jun 1989, yet you look down on me for being born late. China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty by international standards in just 40 years, whereas the whole rest of the world only lifted 150 million by comparison. Video: Historical achievement: Take 700 million out of poverty youtu.be/CljWffPgmG8 "China has lifted 728 million people out of poverty by international standards. The whole rest of the world has only lifted 152 million." - John Ross, Well-known columnist in UK, Former Deputy mayor of London.
    1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1