Comments by "神州 Shenzhou" (@Shenzhou.) on "Actual Justice Warrior" channel.

  1. 8
  2. 6
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14.  @emberfist8347  "神州 Shenzhou The Chinese Civil War began in 1927 so China didn't have war for at least a decade until Communism was popular." The Communist Party of China was founded in 1921 with only 50 members, but fast forward to today, and the CPC has survived for 100 years, and is among the world's largest political parties whose ranks have swelled to a membership of over 90 million (about the population size of Germany). And again, could you explain how were the Communists the reason why China is so war-torn? You said: "Also you can't say definitely China wouldn't be unified if it wasn't for Mao as that is a lie. Taiwan isn't part of the PRC and Hong Kong wasn't part of China during his tenure." Well, why did the Republic of China 🇹🇼 lose the mainland to People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 and had to flee to Formosa (Taiwan)? During the Chinese Civil War, the Nationalist KMT had massive wealth (they taxed peasants heavily) they had superior weapons and superior numbers over the communists, yet despite all these initial advantages, the KMT still lost the mainland to a bunch of dirt-poor, heavily-outnumbered, ill-equiped, starving communist peasants and had to flee to Taiwan. If anything, this demonstrates the KMT's gross incompetence in their right to rule the mainland, while cementing the communists' right to rule the mainland. As for Taiwan and Hong Kong, it's because the mainland was unified under Mao, that Taiwan and Hong Kong remain part of China. If you go and read Taiwan's constitution, it says that Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. Since there hasn't been any amendments to Taiwan's constitution, then by default, Taiwan is part of China under their own constitution. As for Hong Kong's 1997, Chairman Mao reunifying mainland China is what made China powerful enough so that Britain had to return Hong Kong back to mainland China in 1997. Had Mao failed to reunify China, the British won't have returned Hong Kong back to.. whatever was in place of China at that time.
    1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20.  @TimPortantno  About "might makes right," Chairman Mao Zedong once said that "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" (枪杆子里面出政权). Back when Dr Sun Yatsen overthrew the previous Qing Dynasty China and established "democratic" Republic of China 🇹🇼 (1912-1949) China was divided into several areas, we lost control of Tibet, and various warlords ruled different parts of China and even Japan invaded China twice during this weak period of Chinese history. Dr. Sun tried to get help from the Western powers, but they laughed at the thought of China copying their democracy. They even gave away the Shandong province (which had been occupied by the Germans during WWI) to Japan, instead of returning it to China (even when China was part of the Allies during WWI). In the end, Dr. Sun died without ever realising a unified China under democracy. But then Mao Zedong came along, and he accomplished what the ROC could not, and reunifed China under communism, proclaiming the People's Republic of China 🇨🇳 in 1949 and Tibet was finally returned back to China in 1951. If not for Chairman Mao Zedong, China today would still be weak and divided country, fighting among ourselves, instead of the strong unified country we are today. So where China is concerned, our political system has shown to be viable for our country (and extremely successful to boot) then what's wrong with the concept that "might makes right", when it works for China? Not all countries have to adopt Western brand of democracy to be successful and China is living proof of this.
    1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1