General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
RM Domainer
The Times and The Sunday Times
comments
Comments by "RM Domainer" (@rmdomainer9042) on ""Russia will launch devastating attack" if Crimean Bridge is struck" video.
@konstantinbush295 Crimea already voted NOT to be in a federation with Russia 1991. You do not actually get to hold elections in places you seize with a gun. Most mildly talented children would understand the issue, but for some reason you do not.
13
@konstantinbush295 @konstantinbush295 "Temporary resolution about referendum and order of carrying it out on territory of Crimean Oblast of the Ukrainian SSR is to be approved (annex #1)" Keep track. This was a vote against being in a federation with Russia "96.8% of Crimeans voted in a referendum to join Russia." As I said, an invading power do not get to hold referendums. Your percentage is also completely unrealistic. At the end of the day, no nations recognise this election except a literal handful of sc-mbag states (like Russia and Sudan)
10
@samcook159 That is not what liberation means.
4
Do you really believe the Donbass Railway lines do not go over bridges too?
4
@frankdipadua7116 We should ask the people in Crimea under FBSs thumb, or when they are not? Are we to bring the original tatar inhabitants back first, or not?
4
@frankdipadua7116 NO real country accepts the annexation of Crimea. Only about 5 dictatorships. End of story.
2
@frankdipadua7116 So should those people driven out by the invasion be allowed to vote? Should the Tatars? And who are you "Frank di Padua", as a westerner, to determine either way.
2
@tamdang8346 Indeed. Some chutzpah from the colonialist Zakharova here.
2
@jozefcizmarik1955 bolela Seisemane
1
@devacore477 And you do?
1
@Hoophey It is Vranyo again.
1
@awalk5177 "which is a war crime" Don't you mean a Special Military Operation Crime?
1
@awalk5177 "who voted over 90% to be aligned with Russia, " They already voted NOT to be in 1991. You do not actually get to forcibly transfer or chase away some voters, then run an election.
1
@frankdipadua7116 You sound pretty thick "Frank". Bottom line, you do not actually get to invade a place and then run an election there to justify your violence. NO real country accepts the annexation of Crimea. Only about 5 dictatorships. End of story.
1
@frankdipadua7116 You sound pretty thi-ck "Frank". Bottom line, you do not actually get to invade a place and then run an election there to justify your violence. NO real country accepts the annexation of Crimea. Only about 5 dictatorships. End of story.
1
@frankdipadua7116 @frankdipadua7116 You sound pretty thick "Frank". Bottom line, you do not actually get to invade a place and then run an election there to justify your violence.
1
@frankdipadua7116 Taiwan is a defacto sovereign entity. It has never been ruled by a communist china.
1
@frankdipadua7116 " Neither side is fully correct. But the West should stay out of it" The west stays out of the Donbabwe situation until push came to shove. Let me remind you that Russia recognises the pre-2014 territorial integrity of Ukraine, by treaty. They should stay out. The strongest forces in the world should not be bullied by a weaker one.
1
@frankdipadua7116 No, I am talking about the Budapest Memorandum and then the border treaty of 2003. You sound confused.
1
@frankdipadua7116 That would be a red herring fallacy. I brought up multiple treaties, the budapest memorandum and the border treaty of 2003 that both predate the Minsk Accords by decades. Deal with this fact.
1
@frankdipadua7116 The real issue is the chronological one and your red herring. Has RU broken earlier agreements, yes or no? "Ukraine through the Budapest memorandum was supposed to remain neutral" Which paragraph?
1
@frankdipadua7116 " Ukraine through the Budapest memorandum was supposed to remain neutral" That is vranyo, gopnik.
1
You say that every time, you child-stealing weird-o
1