Comments by "RM Domainer" (@rmdomainer9042) on "Time for a new Ukrainian offensive?" video.

Why did you post this several times with several usernames?
12
He has an actual University degree and a military command. Either of which you could not attain in this lifetime. Says something about you.
6
@Princip666 LOL. You misunderstand the concept. First of all, the OP produced no argument. In response to that, stating that the guy that talks about military matters is in fact a military expert by education and career is not an appeal to authority. It is hilarious that you get rhetoric so wrong. You can cry now.
4
@Princip666 "It is clear that OP expressed his opinion on Puck's work " He expressed no opinion on his words. End of story. The fact that you are clutching the straw of a fallacy while ignoring the ad hominem is priceless. You are still crying.
4
@Princip666 Non sequitur. This is the OPs statement "who tf is this egg head? another military expert emojiface" Which part of this is an opinion on Anders's words? Which part of this is not an ad hominem?
4
This was posted by another username here: " I think it is time for Europe to step up and stop depending on the US. The fate of the Ukraine & Europe's security should not be dependent on the US elections" Do you need paid openAI to help you with your shilling or does the free version suffice?
2
@Princip666 "You have nothing more than Puck's credentials to counter" You are cottoning on. His credentials have been produced by me when they were questioned. So not an appeal to authority at all. You are the weakest link. A statement such as yours is sufficient to fail a high school debating class.
2
@Princip666 "You did not call him out for ad hominem" Moot. I will repeat the questions since you are trying to evade them. "Which part of this is an opinion on Anders's words? Which part of this is not an ad hominem?"
2
You conflated "your" with "you're". This means that everybody that is literate disregards your statement.
1
He is about as relevant as Kamala Harris
1