Comments by "oolong2" (@oolong2) on "VICE News" channel.

  1. 548
  2. 222
  3. 165
  4. 60
  5. 43
  6. 42
  7. 32
  8. 28
  9. 27
  10. 25
  11. 25
  12. 21
  13. 19
  14. 18
  15. 18
  16. 18
  17. 17
  18. 16
  19. 15
  20. 13
  21. 13
  22. 12
  23. 11
  24. 11
  25. 10
  26. 9
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 9
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34. 8
  35. 8
  36. 7
  37. 6
  38. 6
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 5
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4
  51. 4
  52. 4
  53. 4
  54. 4
  55. 4
  56. 4
  57. 4
  58. 4
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 3
  62. GothicIntellect Did I call you white or black? Nope... "You people" referring to people who make assumptions about a movements present and past that you don't know anything about. As I went on to explain. I don't care what your race is. I care about your backwards ideas. BLM has two websites so you can educate yourself on exactly what they are asking for. Instead of making up your own narrative. Again, the deaths specifically protested this year have little to nothing to do with resistance. As well as the statistics that are plain to see. You could educate yourself on these things instead of making up your own narrative. There are more white people in this country. Of course more would be shot. Do you not know how percentages work? Guess what? pretty much all the cops killed this year where killed by white people with guns. Black on Black crime is just as prevalent as White on White crime, Hispanic on Hispanic crime, and Asian on Asian crime. You know why? You know what the big fucking secret is? Because people of the same race typically live near each other and criminals attack people near them not the next town over. However you've clearly been fooled into an ignorant and racist narrative that wants you to believe that this is somehow unique to black people. It isn't. Look at the fucking statistics. Again, MLK was investigated by the FBI and he was accused of inciting violence. Again, people like you who made the same assumptions about MLK in the 60s as you are with BLM today. You assume they are violent when there are hundreds (if not thousands) of peaceful protests. Of course they have cameras on all the time, but if it bleeds it leads right? That's why you only care about a chant from a year ago but you don't give a shit about the hundreds of peaceful protests.
    3
  63. 3
  64. 3
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71. 3
  72. 3
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. Scott Provan, See my response to Edward. You're making the same mistakes in logic. Just because you don't have an answer for something doesn't make something else true. Asking a question and expecting to fill it with the narrative you were given is the first sign that you're not using evidence, you're using stories.... It's the exact same logic that proponents of "ancient aliens" use. "We don't know how this ancient structure was created a long time ago, so it must have been aliens" If you don't like religion, then don't rely on same irrationality of filling something unexplained with a magical concept or a magical being... The number of sealed indictments you were told about is wrong, please look into it further. When you do you will see that most are not even for criminal cases. CEO's resign all the time. What lies are you talking about? Especially when Donald Trump lies constantly. Congressmen and senators always conveniently resign when they think they are about to lose, which is very likely to happen in during the midterms. There is nothing unusual about it. You won't see proof of a prank because you're not looking for it... There was an Italian a novel called "Q" written in the 1990's whose main character (called Q) could have easily inspired this hoax. Nothing is happening , nothing will happen, just like nothing happened with the last thousand conspiracy predictions that all turned out to be bullshit. This is just another in a long line of people fooling themselves with fairytales.
    2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186.  @maximmatusevich3971  My point on Libya is that the argument on the left is about saving lives. It's the same argument for Darfor. The argument on the Right is about asserting power and pre-emptive action. The Right didn't care about the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that were killed, we did. The Right doesn't care that the US is supporting Saudi Arabia's war (genocide) in Yemen, we do, The Right doesn't care that we occupied Iraq for years, we did. The Right didn't care that we were planning a war with Iran, we did. The right didn't care when Trump left the Iranian peace deal, we were screaming about it. The right didn't care when we did air strikes on Iran or assassinated one of their top leaders, we did. The right doesn't care about drone strikes killing hundreds of civilians each year, we do. And we cared about it under Bush, Obama, and Trump. My point wasn't whether Libya was the correct action or not, it was the motivations behind it and the fact that you are drawing a false equivalency between the "liberal" support for military action vs the right wing support for military actions. You're trying to say that every situation is the same and that is not the case. The fact is we got in and we got out of Libya, we did it with the support and cooperation of other nations, and we left on good terms. This is not the same as Iraq, Afghanistan, or Venezuela. --"According to a 2012 poll conducted by Gallup, 54% of Libyans approve of U.S. leadership, compared to only 22% and 19% respective approval for China and Russia's, and 75% of Libyans say they approved of NATO's military intervention in the civil war."
    1
  187.  @maximmatusevich3971  As far as voting goes. In 2016 Russian's infiltrated political organizations, manipulated social media, created "fake news", and had a massive hacking operation that hacked both the RNC and DNC (although only the DNC emails were leaked) and hacked voting machines themselves. Google: "Russia Targeted Election Systems in All 50 States, Report Finds". Dozens of indictments were made and a lot of Russian diplomats died suddenly after the 2016 election. All of our intelligence agencies confirmed the meddling that was taking place however The right pretended that any concerns over Russia were all lies and made up, because it benefited Trump to ignore it. And now you pretend that the only fraud and hacking that could have occurred is ONLY to benefit Biden. It's absurd.... The difference is we let whatever investigation take place if there is any merit to it, because we care about the truth. We don't pretend every investigation that doesn't benefit us is a hoax. All anyone on the left ever asks for is to count every vote and to not disenfranchise voters. Which happens every single election. Brian Kemp literally kicked hundreds of thousand of likely Democratic voters off the rolls just before his election. A lot of companies are connected to right wing pundits and politicians as well. The difference is we don't automatically discount information just because of some "connection". FusionGPS was originally hired by a right wing media outlet to do opposition research on Trump before the Clinton campaign. You guys have no problem with Trump, or the Right wing, paying for opposition research, which they do all the time, yet somehow it automatically becomes nefarious when the same thing is done by Clinton.
    1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. WouldYou LookAtThat I don't know how I can be any clearer. There was NEVER any evidence supporting that Seth Rich ever leaked ANYTHING at any point. Again, this was a made up bullshit story. PERIOD. The fact that you still believe something that has long since been recanted by the very outlets who were spreading an unsubstantiated story, is sad. The fucking family has even had to come out speak out against you people because you believed this bullshit. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/may/23/newt-gingrich/claim-slain-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-gave-emails-wiki/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/seth-rich-dnc-wikileaks-murder/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/05/22/fact-check-newt-gingrich-spreads-seth-rich-conspiracy-theory/102028556/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/family-of-slain-seth-rich-says-reports-he-fed-wikileaks-dnc-info-are-untrue/2017/05/16/9b32ef9c-3a46-11e7-8854-21f359183e8c_story.html?utm_term=.ad20f0358ee8 The fact you haven't even bothered to even verify whether your comment is true or not since it was challenged just boggles my fucking mind.... You people actually don't even care that you live in a bubble. If it were me I would have at least spent 20 seconds on Google to figure out if there was anything true about what I believe, but NOOO you guys don't fucking care. You will just keep repeating the same unsubstantiated bullshit you've been fed FOR YEARS. Then you wonder why our country is going down the fucking toilet.
    1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1