Comments by "Steven Price" (@stevenprice6957) on "Life After Acquittal | Matheau Moore Speaks on the Staged Suicide Murder Trial" video.

Good on you Matt. I watched this a whole case from start to finish. The prosecution was the only guilty party here. Seriously. No DNA no traces of tree matter on him or his home. The whole thing was a joke. How they even charged him was just baffling. I’m glad he has that defence lawyer doing her work with a passion. You can easily see how innocent people get convicted. There’s almost a crooked side to prosecutors at times and a lot of the times. They way they can just put things under the carpet if it doesn’t suit their case. It’s a very flawed system world wide. It was a no brainer she killed herself. Like she said, he ain’t a mastermind and he isn’t Houdini. I’d ask a for strong man to carry a body through scrub and stage this in the manner explained and ask how they could have done it. He looked totally unfit and for him to have no tree matter or scrub matter on his clothes or at the house or car is impossible. Anyways. It’s good to see an innocent man be set free. It’s sad what happened but people kill themselves. She unfortunately killed her self. Family and friends want someone to blame. There’s no one to blame. It just happens.
19
What you think matters little. The proof showed his innocence. It was as plain as day. She killed herself. The evidence showed that.
3
She went in the morning. She was seen in the morning. He wasn’t with her. 🙄
3
@michellejames5953 also speaking about his son and saying he could have done it. What’s that? He wasn’t within a bulls roar at the time of death. Next you’ll say he killed Emily’s mother in that car accident too. Emily had trauma. She killed herself. He also had trauma and much more than you would know about. Finding his son in the trees. No wonder he didn’t want to go searching for his wife. Anyways I think you are out of line. You aren’t alone.
3
Lol. Moronic people everywhere. He’s as innocent as the day is long. The only guilty party here are the prosecution. They should be held accountable for their display their police work. Pathetic. He couldn’t have possibly staged this without bringing tree matter back with him. It was a crawl through the scrub bush. He’s totally unfit. How is not a part of tree matter not on him the car his clothes. His clothes were still in the basket not even washed. Dumb and dumber would know this was not a murder. She killed herself. It’s basic common sense for those who have some.
2
@Moonchild14928 You call it bashing. I call it stupidity. Yes have an opinion is fine. If you know nothing about evidence and crime then best not to comment. He wasn’t just found innocent. He was innocent. The state of Ohio are the only guilty party here. When you shove evidence that actually clears a guy under the carpet, then it’s common sense to know what’s going on here. They were on a train and didn’t want to put the brakes on. She was seen at 8:30 in the morning by the peeping Tom across the road. He then said he wasn’t sure if he saw her the morning before or that actual day. So phone records showed it could not have been the day before as she was 40 miles away. So he had to have seen her on the day and morning in question. That means she was alive at the time of this so called murder. So their theory was totally wrong. Her neck was damaged while rotting hanging from a tree in wind. It’s not hard to work out. How he could stage that and leave no tree matter on him in the car or at his house or on his clothes is clearly impossible. How an unfit man could carry her so low through thick scrub around 180 metres without having a trace of dna tree matter isn’t possible. It all leads to she did it herself. She hooked her own legs so to Do this thing properly. Wouldn’t surprise me if she actually jumped once and she hit the ground and lay there hurt for a while. She had grog with her. She had vapes with her. Houdini couldn’t pull that murder off. He isn’t close to Houdini. Only bias and or not having a clue on crime scenes could possibly have someone think otherwise. She necked herself. 100%. That’s not opinion. That’s straight up fact. Only blindness would have you or anyone think otherwise.
2
Here’s another 🙄 he was totally innocent. You’d have to be either a man hater or just not too much on the bright side to not know this.
2
@Aboma2012 why do people kill them selves? If we knew, then we wouldn’t let it happen. We don’t always know what people feel inside. She definitely killer herself. It was shown in evidence. He definitely didn’t do it. That was also shown in evidence. It’s not rocket science.
1
Dumb people. They are everywhere.
1
@hazelhadley-britt6396 yep females are the worst. Not all. Some are pathetic. Have no idea and are just plain stupid. Then they act as though they are detectives and don’t even do their homework. Men are guilty before they even think about it sometimes.
1
@michellejames5953 Sexist ? I don’t care if you are Michael James. If you are not close to knowing the facts of the case or just be blinded to the facts, I’ll call it out. It has nothing to do with your sex. It was a dumb comment. Anyone who knows this case and says he is guilty, either is brainless or bias.
1
@michellejames5953 I don’t drink. I said you’d have to be dumb or brainless or not have a clue or be a bias man hater. Which one is it ? Maybe you don’t hate men. If that’s the case then maybe do some home work before talking nonsense. Some of the comments were not only out of line, they were just ridiculously dumb.
1
Yeah the truth is she necked herself. It’s plain and simple. Those are the facts.
1