Comments by "Steven Price" (@stevenprice6957) on "Karen Read Bodycam Deep Dive | Closing Arguments with Vinnie Politan" video.

  1. She’s a deadly dangerous lady and has her fans totally bluffed.
    7
  2. Melanie knows about as much as turtle neck. Maybe she should get her facts right and don’t believe everything she is told.
    7
  3. I know fairdinkum. How they let that on his baffling. She seems like a narcissist to me, so i would believe zero that come out of her mouth.
    5
  4. Why change your story then? Why admit it at first and then say oops sorry it wasn’t me. Next she will say it was the one armed man.
    4
  5.  @snowcattish Yeah underneath isn’t going to damage is it. Now the animal theory has left the defence bucket, what’s next. She killed him. She left him for dead. She’s as cold as ice.
    4
  6. Karen Read is full of it. She mentioned at one stage she was so drunk she didn’t remember anything. She mentions twice I got him a hit him. She says they pulverised him against her tail light 😂 what and then she went home and had a nap for a few hours and then come neck to pick him up from the snow🙄 What did Ben chew say, did he say she’s got sassy and she’s like the chick off my cousin Vinny. Umm no she isn’t. For one, lisa was hot and truthful. Karen Read is not that. How’s in the court room, you see this blonde woman shaking her head at every stage and looks to be a number 1 fan of this killer. Hopefully she isn’t aloud at trial to have body language like that. Karen Read is a manipulative woman and a narcissist. Her lawyer looks like he’s from the same breed. She’s a killer. Hopefully the jury look at the evidence and put this witch away.
    3
  7.  @snowcattish Well you sound like an expert, so what was it then ? We can rule out animals now, so what’s the next theory ?
    3
  8. Vinnie is a legend.
    3
  9. No animal DNA. Why are people still going with this? The defence have dropped that theory as it was a bad one.
    3
  10. Did you say possibly framed ? You said before that, she’s 100 % innocent. So what is it? Is it possibly framed, because if she wasn’t framed, she killed him.
    3
  11. Don’t believe everything you hear. Wait till the trial. The defence are trying to put shadows on everything and virtually none of it is factual.
    3
  12. She didn’t drive up to the body. Common sense man. Come on.
    2
  13.  @LeannaMurphy-mx7zy a body can smash a car in a big way. She probably knocked him down once then went again as his head was smashed and those scratches are from the metal underneath the car. The dog DNA didn’t work for the defence, so guess what. They’ve dropped that myth. What a joke the defence are. Do you realise her lawyer said early that this was an accident and not on purpose so she shouldn’t be charged in this manner. Later on reads team change it up. She has changed her story 4 times. She said she knows that they pulverised him against her tail light. What lol. So she knows this she said so it’s her car and she was in it. So did she drive home after that and come back 4 hours later ? Think about how laughable that sounds.
    2
  14.  @Dmblover1924 she stated I hit him twice. She asked for someone around her to check how long it takes to die on the cold. The Dog theory has vanished. It’s scrapped and was a joke from the start. They knew the DNA cleared the poor doggy. Geez poor puppy got the blame from the read team. She said she knows they slammed him into her car? Hang on, so she was there in her car? He cops a beating and she drives home for 4 hours and comes back? How’s that defence sounding., I thought the theory was he was running around the house ? How many lies and changes of theories ?
    2
  15.  @Barb417 That wouldn’t surprise me. They are like a herd out front of that courthouse. IT’s the conspiracy thing. Not knocking Americans but geez they do love a conspiracy more than any other country. They want to think there’s something up and that they know more. I just go with evidence and facts. The earth isn’t flat. There has been zero true evidence of aliens landing on earth and Karen read steam rolled that poor man with her vehicle. The evidence is everywhere. Read admitted at first then changed her story. She has changed it numerous times and so has her defence. Now there’s no animal involved because guess what, the DNA showed it wasn’t an animal. I knew that from the start and so did they. They just want garbage put out there as to have a public and media defence. Do people think the dog wiped up his own DNA or wore gloves. Seriously there’s some fanciful things going around these days.
    2
  16. She knows she hit him but let’s put any theory out there and see what sticks. Next she will say it was Jack the Ripper.
    2
  17. She will be on a episode of deadly woman in a couple of years.
    2
  18.  @aznaturegirl how do you know. Were you there? Why did she lie and why change your story 3 times. Why admit it at first? That to me is not innocent. Though you seem certain. Maybe she just wanted to be charged hey? Lol
    2
  19.  @MrBetc exactly.
    2
  20. Because she’s a narcissist. No remorse.
    2
  21. Who was the muppet who said that? What a joke.
    2
  22. What a load of crap.
    2
  23. There isn’t a dog involved. The defence has dropped that fanciful theory. Tests for DNA were done early and repeated. Reads team just like throwing up garbage to stooge the media and her fans. She’s a killer and a liar.
    1
  24. Yes she did. She said they pulverised his head into her headlight. She said they killed him. Where’s her proof of that? Is that her in fairy land ? First she says she couldn’t remember the night, and what then she remembered? Lol. So considering she was there as it was her car they pulverised his head into, then what,she went home for a few hours and attempted to pick him up later ? Haha. Yeah that’s real isn’t it. She’s a joke and so is her defence team. Story teller Karen. Changes her story. What about the defence at start saying, oh there’s no way this is murder it was a total accident and she didn’t mean it. Then the defence goes south of that. So she went south of that.
    1
  25. Nonsense. Then defence lies to cover up earlier lies. They have caught the Karen Read bug. Just make it up as you go. She’s one evil woman and hopefully she is found guilty and is put where she belongs.
    1
  26.  @caroltaylor9499 let’s stop the nonsense now. Get with the program. Dog DNA was cleared long ago but the defence kept going and kept going with it. Now guess what, they now have dropped that ridiculous theory. All they was, was the read throwing doubt around as to make the public and media in believing something that is nothing. It helps the lore fans she has. It helps when the media jump at shadows. This is how it snowballs. It helps when you blame the police as there’s nothing better than a cover up conspiracy. They are clutching at straws.
    1
  27.  @pistolpete8231 Pistol. Stop the nonsense. It isn’t the FBI. It’s a sacked FBI agent that has come up with that. So take note of that and take note of what position he holds. He isn’t in the FBI and holds nothing in authority at all. Now the real FBI haven’t said that. The real FBI had to check this case because of certain accusations and they’ve done that and given the go ahead. Considering they e given the go ahead, isn’t great for Karen Read. They believe she’s guilty. Do not believe everything you hear from a defendant like this and her team. They are clutching. The dog theory is now scrapped from the defence. Why is that? That was cleared long ago through DNA so why keep going down that path? Then when the trial is near, they say oh no ? Let’s drop that theory ? They want the public and media with her. They are lying to the public and media to have follower. No followers she has no chance. The evidence will speak for its self. She’s a story teller. She’s a narcissist. She’s deadly dangerous. She reminds me of an ex.
    1
  28. She thinks this is a joke and she’s acting like a sporting champion who just won a gold medal. It makes me sick. Those women are the most dangerous.
    1
  29. She is a deadly woman.
    1
  30. She’s so full of it. Total narcissistic evil woman. Look at her smiling. No remorse.
    1
  31.  @aznaturegirl Don’t believe every myth told by the defence. It’s slowly turning. Now they’ve dropped the dog scratching and bites theory.. hang on ? Why are they changing? Why did her lawyer at the start say it was a total accident and days later change they? She changed her story to whatever the evidence was telling her. Then it’s snowballed. She should have just admitted it all the way and said it was an accident if it was. The fact they went with murder, put them into a corner I suppose. So now they are scratching around for anything they can. Why drop the dog theory ? Do you know why? Because they now know it isn’t a animal involved through DNA. Doggy didn’t wear gloves and clean up his slobber at the scene did he.
    1
  32.  @jantregidgo How come many of you are still going on about dog scratches?? The dNA says no it wasn’t. You cannot clean scratches from DNA. Think about it. The defence have dropped that ridiculous theory now. Why do you think they dropped it? Now their theory is he didn’t die from a car. Hang on? Their defence has changed more than a traffic light in 3 hours. They are clutching at straws.
    1
  33.  @davobmw No I just don’t like killers getting away with it. If a cops dirty then lock him up. Fact is the FBI have given the go ahead so that spells bad things for Read and her phoneys. Why all of a sudden are they dropping the dog theory ? Think about it? They know it’s a ridiculous theory. Did the dog wipe up the scene on his body and wear gloves 😂 be smarter
    1