Comments by "Steven Price" (@stevenprice6957) on "Suzanne Morphew's Body Found | Is Her Husband's Alibi Confirmed?" video.

We don’t know the circumstances of their marriage. Whether he was a monster or she was just as bad. All we know is one was cheating and it wasn’t him. No one deserves to die and of course not this woman. What we don’t like for certain is, did he do it. We can guess and have a hunch but none of us really know the answer to this. Abused partners should always walk but it’s not that easy for some. Then again if you are a cheating partner, then you should be walking before you make that move to do so.
16
@melaniereisner8375 none of the truck data was missing. You’ve heard or read it wrong. His truck didn’t move from the driveway that night. He car didn’t either. No other vehicle on the premises. So it’s very much a mystery.
10
@Jennifermcintyre Where are you getting this from ? Is this a social media rumour ?
8
@Mamashuge yeah well just because someone dumped rubbish, I’m afraid they need more than that. Were those bins searched ? I’m sure they were. Did they find zero ? My guess is yes as nothing has come of it.
8
@kimclarke5018 that was the prosecutions theory but no evidence was shown if he having an affair with anyone. Also speculation he was talking or searching a 15 year old girl. That’s not confirmed either. The wife Suzanne thought he was cheating or I believe was hoping he was cheating so it would make divorce proceedings easier. So yeah, no evidence he was cheating at all. Only evidence she was cheating with a married father of 6
6
@Mamashuge Yes it’s suspicious for sure, but that just makes him a serious suspect in this case. It looks like he’s involved and smells like it, but that isn’t enough. Aeroplane mode, what’s that prove? Nothing really. It just shines the light on him a lot more. They have to tie him to the remains site with either a vehicle or accomplice, or have some sort of evidence in her bones with tranc that he supposedly used or just traces of something there. Cause of death means nothing in regards to connecting him unless it’s a gun or tranc or something that leads back to him. The fact there’s DNA of another on her bike and in her helmet, just leaves so much doubt.
4
Hopefully you are never on a jury.
3
So where’s the evidence from the bins ? I’m sure they checked them? You can have a theory and yeah it all fits well but unless there’s proper evidence, this case is going nowhere.
2
@emoliver80 don’t make up fairy stories because it fits your narrative. Spark facts not guess work.
2
@Aristobulos7 That’s your evidence is it. What extraordinary behaviour are we talking about? That he said it could have been a mountain lion ? Or he’s dumping rubbish ? I am no way saying this bloke is not guilty. Nor am I saying he’s full proof guilty. You are going to need more than the way he acted which was in your view extraordinary. There’s no evidence as yet that ties him to this crime. Only inferences upon one another. That look very suss all stacked upon one another but the defence would have a field day poking through what’s not there. They need a much stronger case. If they don’t get it, then he won’t even be heading to court.
1
@Aristobulos7 Again, I’m not sure if you know anything about innocent until proven guilty but that is not close to enough. Especially when they have unknown DNA in her helmet and on her bike. He probably did kill her that afternoon. But probably isn’t good enough. His truck went nowhere, and nothing was found in the truck that puts her body there. He didn’t carry her 50 miles on her shoulder did he. He was getting watched like a hawk after she went missing so unless police have tracked him to her remains or can put him there or another accomplice, then there’s still too many holes in this case. Because they think he did it or it looks like he did is just not enough.
1
@neige4221 So they are watching him and didn’t get to the bins in time? You don’t know this. That’s your guess or hunch. For all we know, they could have got to those bins and nothing is to be found. They’re not going to tell the world that. No evidence there so they just do what suits them. There’s crooks on both sides of the fence. That’s the way of this world. It shouldn’t be like that but yeah, it’s up to the defence to bring all this out. Land fill you say, well considering there were so many dumps, I’m sure they knew the area of land fill it was dumped. Have they checked ? I’m sure they did in this high profile case. Maybe they’ve found his rubbish and it was just that, rubbish!! So they say nothing as it leaves everyone questioning it. They don’t have to say ok we found his bags of rubbish and it was just rubbish. Why ? Why is that hidden ? It’s wrong. So there could be evidence that actually helps him but they aren’t going to attempt to help his cause. They only want the negative coming out. It’s the system. It’s totally flawed. You see it on many cases. That suicide hanging case was a casing point. The detectives had evidence that showed something but they hey throw it away hoping that it’s not brought up by the defence. If your defence is bad or lazy, then you can be found guilty of something you never did. Like I said, there’s crooks on both sides of the fence. Prosecutors are just as bad as the accused at times. On occasions they are worse.
1
@emoliver80 Yeah let’s just pull back before the day of the murder. She was a cheating H. Dirty low down woman. That’s proven. He wasn’t cheating. You say he was, well that’s not proven. All you women sit on your high horses thinking that cheating is ok. Well it ain’t. Don’t blame the other partner for your cheating. Blame yourself. It’s a low disgusting act. Leave. The low life’s that thinking cheating is ok just have no morals no principle’s. Now is he a killer ? Maybe maybe not? Probably but let’s see more evidence. Making up fairy stories suggesting he was cheating so it’s ok that she does is a warped thought process. They looked into him having an affair and could not substantiate these claims. So it’s hear say. That’s not proof. The proof showed she was banging a married man and father of 6. It also shows she was willing to live overseas with him and for both of them to leave their partners and children. Yeah mother Teresa she was. Does that mean she deserved to be killed. Of course not. Let’s stop pretending she was a good human being. She wasn’t. He maybe a scum bag too. I have idea. He’s up for murder right now or that’s by public opinion. No charges have been laid. Unless there’s evidence that 100% points to him. than this maybe unsolved for years.
1
@robinbond7878 Yeah so a jury can send him to the gallows because he’s in your view told stories ? Look if you are asking me whether I think or believe he did this, I’d have to say yes but that’s just an educated guess. I cannot just wipe out other factors. It’s whether I can convict this man with this evidence so far. Well I cannot. So I’m sure there will be many a juror who would think the same. Show me the money. Show me the god damn evidence. Not the little bits and pieces that make him look guilty, I want stone cold hard evidence. I’m from Australia and you just cannot send a man to the firing range on inference stacked upon inference. Either show me toxins in her bones that were from that tranc gun. Put Barry at the site of her remains. Or put someone connected to Barry there. Clear up these DNA samples from first the glove box then I want to know, who’s DNA is inside her helmet ? Why is it there. Who’s DNA is on her bike? Why is it there. ? Why isn’t Barry’s anywhere ? Clothes at the dumping site? If so what clothes are there. Why haven’t you gained the stuff that he dumped in bins ? You had footage so where’s the bags of rubbish he put in there?? What if they were found and nothings been said of it as it doesn’t have anything to do with her going missing or her being killed? So they just say nothing to leave that question there for others like you and I to speculate. Maybe that dumping of rubbish was the truth. Prosecutors don’t tell the whole story i hope you know. If it doesn’t fit they’ll discard it. It takes a good defence to pick through their hidings of these type of things. Until this is cleared or proper evidence is found than we are going around in circles. I want to know who’s phones pinged near the remains during the time she went missing ? Is there other pings ? All yet to be answered.
1
@DiddlyD-xx2ih Who said that Bo Diddley. I was talking about separate things Einstein. What I said was cheating is pathetic and no one should do it. You want to cheat then leave. It shouldn’t be too hard. So people mentioning she was perfect and a great mother is not close to on the money. The so called good mother was willing to go to another country with her lover and leave her kids behind. Judging by texts and reports, the father of 6 wasn’t willing to go that far. He was just happy to keep living with his wife while cheating. That’s that subject. Whoever murdered her needs to be strung up. Seperate subjects. How about you go to the toilet and wet your face numb nuts.
1
@cazza-tea Yes but there’s no proof he was with a mistress. My guess is she was hoping he was so as it didn’t look so bad for her. She was cheating and was hoping he was too.
1
Does he look the likely suspect? Yeah for sure but that doesn’t mean it’s sign sealed delivered he did this. Educated guess puts me at 85% he’s guilty. I’m afraid that might as well be zero as you don’t have to be 99% sure, it has to be 100% accurate. There’s too many question marks. The helmet the bike. Who’s DNA is this? They have to find out and eliminate that person. Suzanne was cheating as we know, and the only way we know this is her phone or and computer connected to this married man. Amazingly her best friend didn’t know about it. No one knew about it. Was she having an affair closer to home ? Just sexually ? We don’t know. Was she being stalked ? We don’t know. Yes things point toward the husband but if you cannot find a connection to the site of the remains with Barry or an accomplice than I’m not sure you can convict him in a court of law. There’s too many unanswered questions for mine. Unless they find more proper evidence and not just a bloke putting unknown garbage in bins than they will have zero chance. He was abusive is the theory. No injuries have been shown in her before she went missing. Let’s not pretend that there’s always one perfect partner and the other is a monster. If she was that scared of him, then how on earth did she go cheating with a married father of 6 ? She should have left before the cheating started of course. This case is going to last years unless they find toxicity in those bones that connect Barry or somehow he connects to this site.
1
He wasn’t at the site where her body was found.
1
@John-kv7jo What motive does serial killer or a stranger killing have? They’d motive can be as simple as, they just wanted to kill. Killing or murder was a motive. You’ve got to rule all that out. As it is, it’s definitely not ruled out. Unknown DNA everywhere in this case. No proof he went to this sites where her remains were found. No proof of hat he sent someone there to do his dirty work. They didn’t even have any evidence from those bins. I’m sure they checked them. Motive ? It can be many things to many killers. It could be sexual. It could be rage. It could well be the husband. It could also be someone we have no idea about. Motive is just one of many things.
1
@robinlanier6886 Maybe ? Or maybe a killer was in waiting close by. I have no idea why a man would want a woman who cheats anyway. Also vice versa. Once they cheat they can never change that.
1