Comments by "Steven Price" (@stevenprice6957) on "Karen Read's Defense Presses Chris Albert On Timeline of John O'Keefe's Murder" video.

@PJTYLER DNA says no dog no animal. Why do people still go with that ridiculous theory ? The defence dropped that before trial and only put it out before trial to suck people in and gain more fans. Or do you think the dog wore gloves ? This nonsense continues with people having no idea. She ran over him. She admitted it. She changed her story 4 times.
5
So what he’s 10 mins out from coming home. It happened 2 years ago. So what’s the theory defence ? Young son did it. Did he run across the lawn too ? Clutching at straws. Oh you knew each other so you are all guilty of a Cover up? Not one person said she was angry or they argued. That tells me they are being honest. If there was a cover up then witnesses would have said she seemed angry or something was up with her that night. They all said she seemed ok. Problem is they weren’t in the car. It’s like lovers behind closed doors. No one knows what goes on. Probably flipped it on a jealous way. She is a nut job. She also left him to die after slamming him. The defence has thrown the dog theory out as it was never there in the first place. It’s a media show and they want support. So then the sheep follow and keep following. She’s a deadly snake.
4
That is why Karen Reads story changes numerous times.
3
What has he lied about ? Lol. So he’s put ten minutes when he got home which was 2 years ago? Is that a blatant lie is it? What does it actually matter to this case ? Zero affect on the facts here. Why has Karen had 4 different scenarios on what happened ? Or 5 if you believe that she saw or knew that 2 men pulverised him that night? Which of her stories are correct ? Remember she said she didn’t drop him off at one stage? One scenario is she say out front for 10 mins and saw him go inside ? The other one was she was too drunk too remember. Which one of those is correct ? Why is glass in her bumper? Why admit you hit him twice ? Lol. Yeah he’s lying haha. Seriously the fan club have issues here.
3
Why would anybody else. That’s a ridiculous theory. You don’t know what went on in that car?? Who admit it. Just think about this. You drop someone off there, though she has 4 different stories but we will go with her on this one? Did she drop him off and wait 10 mins like she stated or just drive off ? Take your pick, she says she saw him go into the house. Ok so why go searching for him in a panic 6 hours later? Why call friends to drive you around to find him? Who not take the car you drove to your friend and just go find him by yourself ? Why tell that person that you didn’t drop him off,? Why lie ? Why are you the one to spot a body in blizzard conditions in the dark of night and know it’s up also ? Why when you get out the car and see him in a very bad way don’t you say what happened? Why not go to the door that you saw him go into and demand to know wtf happened? Why avoid all that and instead say I hit him I hit him ? It’s not rocket science is it. She did it that’s why. That’s why the lies.
2
@prmpatti She is just as dangerous. Both evil.
2
Imagine sheep believing in Karen Read? Can you imagine how brainwashed you’d have to be ? Or how gullible? Someone who changes her story 4 times and also admits to hitting him in between. Can you imagine being so foolish to believe in anything she says. Either can I. Sone people hey.
1
@workingonmyroar7944 Yeah so he hangs with them ? You’d think cops would be a little more clever than plonking him on their front lawn. That’s a good story though lol.
1
Here’s another one. The he dog theory was never a theory. It was a media spin brought by the defence at the start but come trial time it’s taken off the table. Why is that ? Maybe because they knew it was not or could not have been any type of animal. DNA proved that. It’s a bluff. The defence are bluffing and So is killer Karen.
1
@marygoff3332 another one. No Canine DNA and the defence were never going in with that once the trial started. Why is off the table ? Use your brains. It’s to bluff people and get more support. So the Defence never went ahead with their early rumours? Why is that ? Did the doggy wear gloves ? Seriously it’s a bit of a joke.
1
@PJTYLER haha. So cops killed him but first took him to the basement and If he wasn’t dead he was knocked out so they plonked him on their front lawn to die did they ? That’s comedy at its best. Karen did it. Don’t be confused with conspiracies. Made up garbage. Glass is in her bumper. She’s a killer.
1
@thedaily30 Yeah whatever you reckon.
1
I see sheep everywhere.
1
@Panda-r8n the black eyes are from a skull fracture. The shoe? Lol. She killed him. That’s a fact.
1
Well said.
1
@Tammy_26Irwin There’s sone delusional sheep around the courthouse. Are you one of them ? That’s about the most ridiculous thing I’ve read in a while.
1
@adaberdugo8 she’s a selfish nut job that’s why. She cares about herself. She knew she got him and then she left him there to die as maybe she was panicking. That isn’t an excuse at all. That is a killer and a cold one. Now she’s putting not only his family through more he’ll but many other family’s too. That’s evil.
1
Karen read could play Annie wilks in misery. She is deadly dangerous.
1
So her story changed 4 times. Nothing up with that? Admitting you hit him twice? That normal to you to? Glass in her bumper ? I suppose all cars have a drinking glass in their bumper. 🙄
1
@Tammy_26Irwin Grow up Tabatha.
1
@gaylelutes1195 No dog involved. DNA was cleared of any animal involved long ago. That was a PR stunt from the defence. That’s why they dropped it before the trial. People are not good at reading a room are they. Easily bedazzled are the public. I guess that is why she has so much support for a killer.
1
@workingonmyroar7944 no that is another defence. She said she got him. Firstky she says she didn’t drop him off then she says she did. Then she says she was out front for 10 mins and watched him go inside. Then she said she was too drunk too remember lol. So which one is it Karen.
1
Lol
1
She’s guilty as it gets. Not sure why people but the fairy stories. Why do smart people believe in 4 different stories? Which one of her stories is true. The only thing I’d believe is the part she said she hit him.
1
@Tammy_26Irwin Who’s salty. Are you ok ? You aren’t related to this crazy Nutter are you arrogance is there in spades. Maybe pull your head in woman.
1
Wouldn’t you be if you were or your family or son were accused of something you had nothing to do with. Didn’t see any cover up. No one said she was angry with him. They said they noticed nothing different. The fact is she killed him. That is the facts. Looking elsewhere is fairytale stuff. Not sure if it’s the public just want that or what it is ? 4 different stories she has. Glass is in her bumper. It isn’t rocket science.
1
Yeah she done it at 6.20 am as you’ll see. That is when Killer Karen asked it to be searched. The defence have done the same with the dog theory. Just throw it up and hope ur sticks. The dog defence is dropped now or didn’t you know that? There’s a thing called DNA so that aaa a myth from the start. Now the man who set up this network or format will testify to exactly what time this search was done. So are people going to believe in her still when the facts come out against her? The fan club are a joke.
1