Comments by "Steven Price" (@stevenprice6957) on "Karen Read Trial: Exclusive Interview with Blogger 'Turtleboy'" video.

Turtle neck is avoiding the evidence. It all points to Karen. No one else.
8
@Cjc2390 if they were dog scratches, that would be found in a jiffy. They aren’t. It’s the bottom of her car. She hit him then ploughed him. She is guilty.
4
The evidence points to her more then anything else. The FBI have gone through this conspiracy theory. As the charges are still there means they found nothing against the people in the house. The tail lights does it for me. Whether she did this on purpose or not ? Though she’s drunk as a skunk so it’s at least manslaughter. Tail light and even going with the dog scratches theory is laughable. Those are not dog scratches. That’s a car running over him. The only questionable matter on this is the google check of how long it takes for someone to die in freezing weather. When was that search done. Did she see him outside and thought he was drunk and out of it and therefor she searched that? That search isn’t proof of murder at all. What is proof is forensics of his injury’s and her car. If they match up then forget anything else. As for the people out there protesting, seriously let the justice system take its course. I don’t know for sure but it seems as though she is an angry drunken woman who flipped after the drop off and reversed into him then went home. Why on earth does she drive a few hours later without contacting him.
4
What if she’s guilty ?
4
@ByronTexas there’s fractures. What are you on about. She’s as guilty as sin. All evidence points to her. You get black eyes on many ways. It can be nose or skull. His hair is in on the bumper. Her tail light is all over him. The drinking glass on her bumper. She’s gone.
3
@ByronTexas most aren’t done by reverse. She is drunk. She probably taps him in reverse then goes again and smacks his head and arm. She’s a killer. Her car was her weapon. Get over it.
3
@ByronTexas How does his hair get on her bumper ? How does her tail light get on his clothes ? How does the wine glass he’s holding get shattered at the drop off point??? How does that glass get into her bumper ? Why has she admitted hitting him twice. Why has she then changed her story numerous times. Once you can answer them for me I’ll come back to you.
2
@JennyVM264 Examples. Karen Read asked all around her when jumping on his body to check how long it takes to die Int he cold. There’s witnesses. That’s when the check was done. The opening up on a google browser at 2:42 or whatever time is in evidence, was about basketball. You’ll see it on the trial. There was a video of basketball watched through this as well. That browser wasn’t turned off, so hours later she typed that in on the request of Karen Read. It will be shown in evidence and the defence know this but are playing stupid public games. She Karen read said I reckon a snow plight hit him. This is before going back to the body. Then she said she sees him when the girls in front could not. She knew he was there. That’s why she gets witnesses to go along with her. Those are not animal marks of any kind. DNA has squashed that theory to stop the nonsense. Turtle Neck doesn’t have his facts. He has the defence in his ear and Karen. She admitted to hitting him twice. She’s guilty. Hopefully there’s Justice for the victim.
2
Not all people are sheep like turtle neck. The facts are that she killed him. The nonsense of a frame is fairy tales
1