Comments by "IgorTheLight" (@igorthelight) on "The Lunduke Journal" channel.

  1. DEIbian ;-)
    60
  2.  @myaccount0000  Lesbian wallpapers are fine! Pushing agenda is wrong! xD
    12
  3. Almost Open Source ;-)
    7
  4. Open Source is an idea - it can't be destroyed! But Open Source projects could be destroyed
    6
  5. Code will be there - developers were banned. "Thank you for your hard work. Now get lost!".
    5
  6. There would be a hack - not an official setting ;-)
    5
  7. Wordpress, Godot then Linux
    5
  8. Micro-brain ;-)
    5
  9. It's kinda optional ;-) Comply or you are not the friend of the West xD
    4
  10. We don't need pro Russian Linux We don't need pro USA Linux We need Free Linux ;-)
    4
  11. "I'll make it legal!" xD
    4
  12. Looks like it
    3
  13. Linux is pretty fine - just ignore all the BS and choose a decent distribution (not Debian, Fedora, Deepin or Ubuntu)
    3
  14. We shouldn't do that ;-)
    3
  15.  @MaragiMusic  Learn how to tweak your OS - that helps A LOT ;-)
    3
  16. Hard fork - copy the program and develop it without giving back Soft fork - copy the program and develop it with giving back
    3
  17. Because it's not pre-installed on most new laptops ;-)
    3
  18. 100%
    3
  19.  @jaujud  Engine itself is fine but their main community manager got a powertrip and started banning people left and right for any imaginary reason.
    3
  20. That's the point! Cold War era divide - that's their goal ;-)
    3
  21. * Notepad++ * Sublime Text And a lot more but start with those ;-)
    3
  22. *MacOS inspired Pretty close tho
    3
  23. It's irrelevant for most people. NSA would not care about you. But if you need a fully secure system - Linux may be not for you anymore.
    3
  24. Maybe he has some money in the US banks. Money that could be frozen if he stop being "a good boy" ;-)
    3
  25. Looks like Linux Torvalds have some money in US stated bank ;-)
    2
  26. Linux itself is fine. But it's not 100% FOSS now.
    2
  27. Just switch to Redot and finish your game ;-)
    2
  28. What about apolitical one? ;-)
    2
  29. You don't have to believe in that - it's just a fact
    2
  30.  @polibmi6510  One nuclear reactor would be MUCH more powerful and much more reliable.
    2
  31.  @polibmi6510  And again - what is easier to lobby or hide: a reactor that works on actual humans or reactor that works on nuclear power (which is much more powerful so it would be pretty small)? Bioreatror just sounds cool and evil ;-)
    2
  32.  @Flavor_Flav  Kinda like me in a way xD I also tried a few Linux distros, a GhostBSD but today I'm using heavily tweaked Windows 10 90% of the time.
    2
  33. Making something new is a bad option - you will get an OS with ZERO programs and ZERO drivers ;-)
    2
  34. Or we just need Actual Free and Open Source Foundation. Where everyone is accepted. Even cats and aliens (as far as they contribute working code, of course!)
    2
  35. Yep! You could ban anyone from any Open Source project for any reason
    2
  36. It's not international - it's stated in US. Their HQ in US ;-)
    2
  37. Yep!
    2
  38. It wouldn't
    2
  39. No we don't. We are talking about banning people because they are "potentially dangerous". I would call that "soft racism".
    2
  40. Stable Diffusion is Open Source so as Llama 3 ;-)
    2
  41. Because all recent news are political It's like asking "why every day there are news about war?". Because there is a war! ;-)
    2
  42. Most are safe. For now. Debian and NixOS became crazy tho xD
    2
  43. So what do they use? ;-) Linux is pretty dominant on servers
    2
  44. For now - no. But code could degrade in time.
    2
  45. And Debian, and Fedora ;-)
    2
  46. OpenMandriva ;-)
    2
  47. "Execute Order 66!" xD
    2
  48. OpenMandriva
    2
  49. Linus Torvalds is not that "new" to be honest ;-)
    2
  50. The difference is: Linux users are generally more tech savvy ;-)
    2