Comments by "gwho" (@gwho) on "Europe's REARMING to defend itself against RUSSIA: A new era for the EU? - VisualPolitik EN" video.

  1.  @hellboundchaoscommand7567  no that's horsesht bafoon logic
    1
  2. A lot of things get attributed to war just because it was used in war and got released during wartime. You're making a gigantic fallacy that economics teaches to not make.
    1
  3.  @olejorgensen1964  so you're saying we should have another great depression. Jk
    1
  4. 11:55. Highly disagree. Safety regulations is very suffocating for innovation and entrepreneurship. Come on.
    1
  5. 1:08 Exactly as Trump said. But orange man bad.
    1
  6. If people think Ukraine is the first war of 21st century... My god they must have never used Wikipedia and just listen to CNN
    1
  7. This sounds very much like trickle down technology. But I'm willing to get a left leaning channel like this will staunchly say trickle down economics doesn't work. Just think about it from first principles. You don't necessarily need military spending first. If military spending spawns research, and that research the gets applied to civilian applications... You can obviously skip the military research part. Duh. All you need is for the research to get done, with SOME highly incentivized or profitable application in mind. Such research would then get applied to other applications as well. Research often is a core scientific principle, which always has multiple uses. You can always argue that the first application needs to get done first in order to do other applications. It can be any application that motivates the research to get done.
    1
  8. 4:50 You paint a very incomplete picture. Yes NATO prescribes a % of GDP spending, but you're not accounting for economic growth. It's possible that absolute spending has grown or stayed the same, and is just a smaller percentage because of GDP increase...
    1