Comments by "gwho" (@gwho) on "Talks at Google" channel.

  1. i loved this so much. he's got such a reasoned, balanced, sensible thought process to arriving at conclusions.
    28
  2. i like the audiobook. very easy to listen to.
    10
  3. the concept of privilege as they use it, rich being privileged, white being privileged, male being privileged. ... are all so blatantly flawed that it's amazing people just say them with a straight face.
    9
  4. Your feelings is an AI algorithm based on only yourself as the dataset.
    8
  5. curious, intelligent, and articulate. Those are the key traits that makes able to do it.
    5
  6. James damper was the public execution to make a statement and send a message
    5
  7. ​ @Stroheim333  yes. "each of richenss, whiteness, and malness confers privilege" like bruh... and also the concept of privilege as they formulate it too....
    4
  8. it's a very imprecise statement. he explained the boundaries and meaning of his statement with his example where he said you can't blame the customer for not wanting a better thing, That is, what is the "correct" business move in the market is ultimately decided by the customers.
    3
  9. bullshit. seeing everything through the lens of class. see how you always have to conflate another dimension? you say it's about class, but notice how you said forgiveness among equals and then non-forgiveness across class lines. how do you know the key factor is not forgiveness rather than class? Marxists who see everything through group conflict are always dishonest and/or stupid like this and jump to preposterous conclusions.
    2
  10. not just survival or reproduction - of anything. like where to eat. INCLUDING things that you can prove with your prefrontal cortex / slow thinking module / logic. you'll feel like some things aren't true or aren't the best decision. Example: the monty hall problem and switching.
    1
  11.  @alexkrasnic3850  exactly. Marxists are pretty stupid.
    1
  12. isn't the idea that god is the greatest thing one can imagine an assumption? what is the intended or deducable definition of god in the context of the bible and whatever pslamist saying that, anyway?
    1
  13. depends what your chemical reward system is wired for.
    1