Comments by "gwho" (@gwho) on "Measles Explained — Vaccinate or Not?" video.

  1. instead of strawmanning and shaming people who have reservations about vaccinations, how about removing the compound of their concern from vaccines? A huge chunk of people who don't vaccinates are concerned about thimerisol, the mercury containing compound. Thimerisol is used as a preservative. So if you really want to get people to vaccinate, how about creating them on the spot, or not using the preservative? You just may find you may have more success rate in persuading people to vaccinate than just by verbally shaming them. Derp. But do they ever correct characterize the objections and qualms non-vaccinators have? No, no mention of mercury, no rebuttals of other points and issues they have. Just "vaccination good. People who no vaccinate bad. Why not vaccinate? Vaccine only good."
    2
  2. Nick Johnson then that is what should be said. not all the other stuff.
    1
  3. Nick Johnson false. too much jumping 
    1
  4. Adeptus Forge not opinions. i merely expressed that people don't strawman arguments, and that if they are indeed safe, then that demonstration of such be shown. not opinions.
    1
  5. Nick Johnson and people with reservations against cyanide are aren't informed. People with reservations about Jews' inferiority aren't informed.  What you are saying is not an argument. It is a subsequent logical conclusion based on assuming the premise in question. But we are questioning the premise, not your logical conclusion based on the presumption of that premise. Learn to logic. Let's talk then =]
    1
  6. Nick Johnson of course. i was just giving examples of the same logic to demonstrate the fallacy within that logic. Try to stick on the logic, rather than getting all offended, which is just a sign of intellectual defeat.
    1
  7. gaupi99 that makes a different  compound. as far as danger or functionality goes, we deal on the basis of molecules, not atoms. Cl is dangerous OK, Na is dangerous OK. But NaCL is a completely different substance, functionally speaking.
    1
  8. 6J0ker9 well maybe some will be willing to pay for it? that makes it a market issue. You, without any data, or market research, don't just get to claim shit.
    1
  9. Nick Johnson insensitive =/= false Just a friendly reminder. fucktard.
    1
  10. Sacky Sackboy pretty sure autism is pretty easy to spot. Autistic kids go to the hospitals, even more so than normal people. There is no likely case that there would have been less reporting or diminished data collection on this matter. (normal comes from the word 'norm', a statistical concept, so for those of you in the process of getting your panties in a bunch, rest assured, you can unbunch them).
    1
  11. 6J0ker9 i won't
    1
  12. Nick Johnson if it's low grade, then it's not that much of a problem, then.
    1