Comments by "betabenja" (@betabenja) on "Donald Trump's conflicts of interest span the globe" video.

  1. I'm not. Their arguments are always terrible. It's always: 'this important fact does not matter because he won, so suck it'' or 'you're just crying, so your facts don't matter' or 'these facts are wrong because Donald said so, despite video evidence' or 'Hillary was worse than Trump so that excuses everything bad about him now' or ''I don't care, my candidate won so I'm turning a blind eye to everything he does.' 'no, your'e fake news; no, you're doctoring those images; no, your'e inciting violence; no your're alt-facts; no you're triggered - what ever you say is what you are, no backsies' .. and so on. ugh. It's like trying to reason with 5 year olds. Worse, they think this is some sort of valid debating style, with no points or facts or valid challenges to the criticisms, no supporting citations, nothing.
    57
  2. She would have faced the same scrutiny if she were president. She is not, so there's no video. How about concentrate on the realities rather than the could-have-beens? Trump is massively comprimisable, that needs to be addressed because it is real right now, and it's not going to change just by pointing elsewhere.
    4
  3. How do you know? I'm just commenting on grammar. For instance, you really need articles. It doesn't take any deep understanding to put them in. Missing articles usually comes from languages that do not have them, like Japanese and Russian.
    4
  4. what does hilliary have to do with this?
    3
  5. what does hilliary have to do with this?
    3
  6. that's not how the collegiate system works. hence the existence of the term 'popular vote'. That are in the minority, just not in states with more voting power. Even if that were not true, most voted against Hillary, rather than supported Trump. Thus, they are not Supporters, even if they voted for him.
    1
  7. Vladimir Putin, and other leaders, because now they can force Trump to tread on the American public.
    1
  8. I don't think he did. I think he funded the Free Syrian Army. Don't try and say they're the same thing. Unless... you have some evidence for this claim?
    1
  9. So really, in English, "wouldn't you rather to not be uneducated 10 year old listening to channel funded by ISIS?" is "Wouldn't you rather not be an uneducated 10 year old listening to a channel funded by ISIS?". And probably it should have a 'than' clause. I think that's probably what he's getting at. Awkward, I know, when you've just tried to patronise someone about it. It's also got a double negative in it, so should probably be re-phrased.
    1
  10. Once again, we don't care about Hillary. She has nothing to do with this. Why are you binging her up at all? Why would we care about Hillary's fund or email leaks or the difference between Trump and her? All now irrelevant. What matters is that the President is blackmailable. what has that got to do with Hillary? nothing. She has no influence on that. Stop mentioning or comparing her, she does not matter any more. Trump is now being compared to Presidential norms, not past competitors.
    1
  11. Fine. Does it matter in discussing Trump? no. Video's about trump. It has no relevance and Trump is still massively compromisable.
    1