Comments by "earthstick" (@earthstick) on "Is it Dangerous to make Misogyny a Hate Crime? Is Sarah Everard's murder being politicised?" video.

  1. Shouldn't we be talking about misandry? Because it appears that there is a great hate of men and this is causing men to become maldeveloped.
    82
  2. This is being used as Britain's George Floyd. The argument being used is always generalisation - guilt by association. They want to treat a group of people with suspicion and guilt because of the actions of a single member of the group. It is only valid to use this technique if the member were arbitrary, i.e. they have no rare properties. But every person has something about them that if different to all others therefore every person has a rare property and there are no arbitrary people therefore generalisation is fallacious.
    17
  3. If they demonise men then they demonise fathers. Then children grow up without a proper family.
    5
  4. When I say maldeveloped I mean where people do not have fathers for instance they are at a big disadvantage in life. Then this policeman who killed Sarah Everard, well he is not the kind of person someone should want to turn out like. If maldeveloped is not the right word then at least I can say men who end up becoming criminals (real criminals). And then of course by continually attacking men they are putting people on the outside of society who end up committing crime so they fulfil the prophecy. I realise this is a bit of a lefty argument but isn't there some truth in that?
    1