Comments by "Buz Off" (@buzoff4642) on "GBH News"
channel.
-
11
-
11
-
8
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Only one Clang! , in this excellent conversation: "Monopoly" capitalism. We either have capitalism, or we have monopolies. Capitalism's essential justification is competition, and if there is no competition, there is no capitalism. What we have is oligarchy, who extract market ownership via bought legislation from the politicians. There is nothing Capitalism about that, it's corruption, for creation/benefit of oligarchy. And it sucked with it, from the political atmosphere, democracy.
Raise your hand if you voted to:
- give big (or little) business exemption to skate on the nation's billing of expenses, aka pay taxes
- give industry control over labor/labor market by simultaneously suppressing min wage and importing a labor glut to immobilize workers
- go global, offshoring production of almost all of our consumables, to the least green choice, the other side of the planet
2
-
This conversation has more than a few issues to chew on.
- If high income inequality is criteria for claiming refugee status, then much of the US qualifies to claim this to relocate elsewhere.
- If violence is criteria for claiming refugee status, then much of Chicago, Baltimore, etc. qualifies to claim this to relocate elsewhere.
- "focus on local", true, zero conversation on impact to "local". It seems #1 priority in governance is foreign issues.
And then there is bigger general problem, no definition of "temporary". Likely this needs to be defined, because there's nothing "temporary" about 20 years. Honestly, if country is not able to accept citizenry back, then there needs to be a time limit when a TPS person is transitioned to a citizen.
And then there's the upper level issues: countries who have NO plan to accommodate those they invite AND escaping violence versus cherry pick relocation: US, England, etc. (Mexico? Belize? etc.)
Lastly, "they have houses, cars, [etc.]", irrelevant.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
It is phenomenal just how much Jim doesn't know about why foreign labor is hired.
Why are so many Silicon Valley upper management Indian? Because 20 years ago, tech transitioned staff hiring to mainly (in some cases strictly) H1B hires, and stayed that way. Because they're cheap and visa indentured. Within 1 year (1997), my entire department (in Mass.) was wiped out and replaced with H1Bs. Cisco, Nortel, Avaya, Oracle, etc.
H1Bs for 2016 alone: FaceBook:3326, Oracle:7751, Cisco:6483, Intel:4508, Microsoft:9589, Google:3256, Apple:5763
1
-
1
-
1