Youtube comments of (@aspenrebel).
-
153
-
121
-
76
-
68
-
68
-
56
-
55
-
50
-
Like here in USA, 8 years under The Obamunist as President [cough cough], he lost over 1,000 Democrat Party Elected Seats Nationwide at National and State Levels. That is how bad he was. In 2016 US Presidential Election Trump won Wisconsin AND Michigan, Democrat strongholds for decades, and he almost won Minnesota. Now if they do something about the fake votes in New Hampshire, he'll win that in 2020 (he should have in 2016) and he'll take 3 out of 4 Electoral College votes in Maine. Not much chance he wins Mass, RI, Conn, VT, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware. Nevada was lost due to fake votes and California transplants. Colorado lost due to legalized drug laws, so alot of druggies moved there. Why New Mexico voted Democrat I have no idea.
41
-
37
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
28
-
25
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
In caves. But if they did not possess the skill nor desire to build out of stone and tiles, then they would have built out of wood, thatch, mud, and grass. If they lacked the blacksmith skills to make tools, then they are limited in what they could do. Take a large group of average people from any city, put them out in the wilderness, and tell them to build a nice large stone building, with windows, and steam heating under the floors, and hot and cold running water baths, and tiled roofs. How do you think they'd do?
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@One-ny1hp Humm? I've thought about that before .... mass and gravity. What is gravity .... really? I've always felt that there is a misunderstanding as to what gravity is exactly. That if it was properly understood, then so called "anti-gravity" would be easy. No more need for rockets to blast off the Earth and into space. That proper understanding of gravity could "unleash" untold "power" and "energy" fulfilling all of Earth's energy needs. But when a star goes "SuperNova" the matter overcomes the gravity of the mass of the star burning out and collapsing on itself. It EXPLODES outward. That certainly is overcoming gravity. I have no doubt that black holes, too, will at some point in time EXPLODE!! IF ... The Big Bang is true (and I am not convinced. It seems like just another overly simplistic scientific "all in one" theory to answer the most complex question. Similar to "a giant asteroid hit the Yucatan and killed all the dinosaurs". Oh yeah, then how come we have frogs, crocodiles, birds, iguana, etc..) ...... then would not The Big Bang's "singularity" simply be the biggest "black hole" of all? BOOM!!!! The Universe... is ... always has been ... and always will be. Time ... is .... always has been ... and always will be. Both have no beginning and no end. IF ... The Big Bang is in fact true, then it has happened before, many times, and will happen again, many times. From Time in Infinity at the Beginning to Time in Infinity at the End. The Universe expands and contracts in conjunction with mass and gravity, and energy. All matter is conserved, all energy is conserved. The Universe only has a specific amount of matter and energy, no more and no less. It cannot be destroyed nor created, or lost or lessened or increased. Dark Energy and Dark Matter, and Regular Energy and Regular Matter are all conserved. A Black Hole is simply concentrated Dark Energy and Dark Matter. So when one does EXPLODE it will all expand outward rapidly, with some converting back into Regular Matter and Regular Energy. Some will remain Dark, and inbetween the Regular stuff.
You can see a black hole directly, similar to how you can see the Moon during a solar eclipse. The Moon is all black (pretty much) when it passes in front of the Sun. But you can see it and know it is there, cuz it is blocking out the Sun. Similarly you can see a black hole by what you can't see cuz the black hole is blocking it. Not to mention all the energy a black hole is shooting out at different wave lengths (rays).
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
+David Drew Communism has probably been responsible for killing a lot more than 100 million, probably more like 200 million. Soviet Union, Stalin, Mao, N.Korea, Vietnam, Pol Pot, Castro, all other communist countries over the years. All other communist uprisings, groups, attacks, protesting, persons, etc.. So, in effect then, you can say that Karl Marx is the Worst Human Ever!!!
7
-
7
-
So why didn't that lawyer, later, just simply arrest the mayor and that cop who told him to get out, for federal felony conspiracy to violate constitutional and civil rights and take them to the FBI, the US attorney, the US District Court, on camera. Then what would they do about it? Because that's the only way these corrupt SOBs are going to get the message. You have to start arresting them. Because they believe they're 100% covered, protected and immune. Then when they realize they're not that's when they start crying like babies, or they resign or retire. The lawyer was 100% correct, US Supreme Court decisions - freedom of speech cannot be violated and cannot be the grounds for a crime unless you're using fighting words or threats or threats to commit bodily harm or murder. Using swear words is freedom of speech. You may not like hearing them, but too bad. Not a crime of disorderly conduct. The Listener has the right not to have to listen to such words. The only option the officials have is to civer their ears, put on headset and listen to music, or get up and walk out and leave (as that one woman) But even by doing that they may be violating some law as a citizens have a right to speak and be heard in that forum by said officials. So if cops had arrested him they could be arrested and charged with assault, assault and battery, kidnapping, conspiracy, conspiracy to violate constitutional rights, the latter a federal felony can be imprisoned up to 10 years in a federal penitentiary. That cop is so ignorant and so dense he can't even understand what the lawyer just read him about US Supreme Court decisions. The cop said he was going to arrest him for disorderly conduct or what actual crime he did say. Cop was going to arrest him for a crime for which he cannot arrest him for, for which he did not commit, for which he has no probable cause, on camera, with all thise witnesses. I do believe that's a threat to violate your constitutional and civil rights, a tgreat to assault you, and a threat to kidnap you.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
"Patton" #1, one of my all time fav movies. Others: "The Dirty Dozen", "Where Eagles Dare", "Guns of Navarone", "Sands of Iwo Jima", "They Were Expendable", "Battle of Britain", "Tora, Tora, Tora", "Tobruk", "We Were Soldiers", "The Green Berets", "Bataan", "The Longest Day", "The Battle of the Bulge", "The Last Samurai", "Zulu", "To Hell and Back" (The Audie Murphy Story), "Hell Is For Heroes", "The Alamo" (John Wayne). "Sergeant York".
7
-
7
-
The standard cop fallback arrest disorderly conduct or disturbing the peace, and I think one or two other things that go by slightly different names. Which cops use to arrest people when they have no basis to arrest people. Then later in court the charge is always drop by the DA or the judge. The cops know is going to happen but that isn't the point. The point is to shut you up, threaten you, intimidate you, get you out of there, arrest you, and lock you up to teach you a lesson that they are all powerful. I believe there was a Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case ruling in a case named "Alegata". Guy was arrested for disorderly conduct by Boston police for being loud and screaming inside Macy's or Filene's department store. The decision was the same as a lawyer red US Supreme Court decisions. I can't remember exactly but if it was a Supreme Judicial Court decision the guy must have gotten convicted for disorderly conduct, and it was overturned. ....... the other one I love, which has been going on forever, is when someone is charged with both robbery and receiving stolen property. I believe it was only just a little while ago that a decision came down from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court saying you can't be charged with both. But the cops, DAs, and the judges still Let It Go On. How can one person be both the person who stole the goods and be the person who received the stolen goods? You can't, it has to be two different people.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!! Holy Crap!! Did you swallow an entire bottle of "PC Pills" or what? ..........."I love all the people in the world. I wish all the people in the world could come live in America.......Ooooooo!..........Ooooooo!.....Oooooooo!". Who said Cheryl Cole was the "most beautiful woman in the world"? Was it me? She is beautiful. I think she is gorgeous and hot, but I would not say she is "most beautiful". It is just that she has this very unique and special mix of so many little subtle attributes, that makes her so HOT!!! Not withstanding that horrendous tattoo. I think she is funny, caring, sensitive, emotional, passive/aggressive, with beautiful eyes, skins, top, body, and the sexiest accent ever.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Along with the plague, was the blocking out of the Sun from the atmosphere filled with material from a major catastrophe. Most likely Krakatoa erupting. Cold, dark, dry, bleak, famine, etc. From about 535 AD to .... ??? .... 544 AD (I forget off hand). This no doubt caused the plague of which you speak (write in proper English there). But as for Tintagel, it was most likely lead by former Roman Officers, Generals, Officials who were able to be relatively safe there from the "barbarians" around London and elsewhere in Britain. Trade ships from the "East"/Byzantine could sail there, and thus bypass all the "barbarians" in Europe. So in effect, it may have been an easy trade route and task to undertake. Just sail around all the trouble areas.
5
-
5
-
@brethen05 The closest recorded distance between Earth and Mars was in August 2003, 34.8 million miles apart. Let's call it 35 million miles. The speed of light is 186,000 miles per second. So it would take light 188.17 seconds, or as you said about 3 minutes, to travel from Mars to Earth. Let's say a space ship travels to Mars, at sub light speed, enters an orbit around Mars, and hangs out for awhile. Then it drops a Nuclear bomb down towards Mars, and speeds away at sub light speed briefly. Before the bomb hits and detonates. The ship observes the large nuclear explosion on Mars, and records it. Then the ship takes off at faster than the speed of light. Say it speeds back to Earth in 1 minute, enters into an orbit around Earth. Then looks back towards Mars with a powerful telescope it has on board. NASA on the Earth's surface is also observing. Then 2 more minutes go by, and the telescope observes a giant nuclear explosion on Mars, cuz the light from that explosion has just traveled the 3 minutes to Earth, and is only now arriving. The telescopes on Earth's surface also observe this. So the ship has observed and recorded this giant nuclear explosion on Mars TWICE!! NASA on Earth has observed and recorded it just ONCE!! So what is your point? The space ship hasn't gone back in Time. No one on the space ship has aged less. They haven't changed the event. It simply means that because the ship traveled faster than the speed of light, that it out ran the light from Mars. So it observed that event TWICE!! It doesn't mean that it observed the event before it even happened nor does it mean that they can alter the event or its outcome nor does it mean that it has any effect on the people onboard the ship. It just means that they are watching the video twice. The same amount of time has passed, 3 minutes, for both the people onboard the ship and for the people on Earth. The ship took 1 minute to get from Mars to Earth, then waited around for 2 minutes, in Earth orbit, for the light of the nuclear explosion on Mars to reach the ship. Same 3 minutes. No one on board the ship can then say "Hey! I better change that and NOT drop that nuclear bomb on Mars to explode". Can't do that, cuz it already happened. You're NOT going back in Time. Time is one directional. Another Example: Say you flew in a ship away from Earth at many times the speed of light. Went a distance that was equal to the amount of time it would take light to travel from Earth, from the date you were born. Then say you could somehow look back at Earth, see the light from Earth now arriving at where you are. Then you could see your own birth. If you traveled a bit further and are now seeing light from Earth from 1 year before you were born, it doesn't mean that all of a sudden POOF!! you don't exist anymore on the ship. All it means is that you passed the light and are now seeing a historical record. It doesn't change anything. The event isn't happening TWICE you are merely seeing it TWICE (if you had seen your own birth on Earth at the time, that is). These Hypotheses put forth are so flawed. Try applying logic and staying in reality.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@ronbronb As I said, marriage is the leading cause of divorce I have never been married, never would, never will. I learned from other's mistakes. But.
Divorces are fair and equitable. She gets the house, car, kids, and money ... and he gets the mortgage payment, car payments, insurance payments, alimony payments, and child support payments. What could be more fair and equable than that?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
WTF are you talking about? Who the hell is Conchita Wurst? Just look at whose pics back in 2005 compared with 2014? Cheryl's or this Conchita Wurst? Of course her looked changed, you nimrod, she grew up!!!! Got older!! You moron!! Cheryl has "fake teeth"? I doubt it, "fake tan"? Not!! "10 lbs of make up"? Well, sometimes, maybe, but not always. "surgeries"? I doubt any. The only real issue is the humongous and horrendous rose tattoo cover her entire ass and lower back. Now that I find appalling!!! In conclusion, YES Cheryl Cole is beautiful. I love her eyes and her accent, as well as her subtle, underling, passive/aggressive sense of humor.
P.S. I'm not in Europe or the UK, I'm an American in the USA. Also, I certain that all the people of Europe are disgusted with having you living there. So leave!!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@nyquilsleepah well MMA/BJJ usually are with a friend or 2, or 5, or 6, or an Entourage. Whereas I'm out in the World, in the city every day and night alone. No back up. And I'm in my 60's. The point is that untrained people in the street who may be criminals, psychotic, high on PCP or something, or armed, and have the mindset to do violence and to hurt or kill someone may do things unexpected in a way you have never seen before. Then you have a smashed bottle in your eye or a knife in your gut. Don't be so full of your own self promotion. From what I've seen of most UFC/MMA/BJJ fighters there are a lot of basic things (which I learned at beginner belt levels which you don't seem to know about). Such as ... self defense, how to block a kick, how to evade a kick and not get kicked, how to throw a punch so it is effective rather than hoping luck, or opponent's lack of defensive skills, lands the punch. How to throw a roundhouse kick and where to kick instead of just throw it out there and get a compound fracture of the lower leg cuz you do it wrong. You all do the same things, the same routine, and expect opponent to follow suit. When he doesn't, you get frazzled. When a Judo guy stops all your attempts to tackle him, when a boxer cuts you to ribbons. I'm still waiting for one time to see one of you know what to do in a clinch. Why would you get into a clinch anyways?. You know, there are many more hand strikes than a closed fist thrown wildly, a closed fist spin around back fist that lands luckily, a closed fist upper cut, an elbow, a forearm. I have yet to see anyone who can throw a jab or a straight back fist. Or other strikes. I dunno, maybe you have some rule that you have to have a closed fist. Don't let your own bravado make you believe you are invincible. How many of your "champions" have gotten the crap beaten out of them? How many compound legs fractures? How many suicides? I've seen a lot more leg fractures since the "picking up your leg knee/shin block" was introduced into your show. I learned that as a beginner. So don't think that some psycho, out of control, aggressive attacker can't get you, hurt you, kill you cuz they can. If you go out in the World alone with your attitude, it could cost you your life. Anybody can be dangerous. They can stand 20 feet from you, pull out a gun in a second, and shoot you dead.
4
-
@nyquilsleepah first off I'm 61 yrs old been training in martial arts since I was 18, in a number of different Arts. I couldn't care a flying F about tournaments or MMA, etc.. I deal with Self DEFENSE .... NOT ... Self OFFENSE. I don't put myself out on display in public. I have no ego. I'm not looking to hurt anyone. But if I have to defend my life, lives of mine, of other innocent people I'll do what is necessary, I'll do the best I can. I'm not interested in putting on a show or winning tournaments or getting medals. I'm not interested in belts or ranks or how many patches and advertising a guy has on. I look at the person. I look at myself. The first I always teach someone is the #1 Rule of self defense:. Don't be anywhere you shouldn't be, with anyone you shouldn't be with, at a time you shouldn't be there. Be at home! Then I show them the #1 Best self defense technique. I have guy stand in front of me as an attacker, then .... I turn ...
And RUN AWAY!! I come back in a couple of mins. Then I tell them "So, learn how to run, train in run and conditioning, lose weight and trim down". But I have a broad training, in weapons too including swords and firearms. Although nunchaku and I do not go together. I prefer tonfa, escrima stick, telescopic baton, sword, knife, gun. All I'm saying is, there are wiser and better ways to defend than rolling around on the ground. I've had a few guys, in street try to tackle me. One put his head right into a headlock, with one hand cuz I was holding something in other hand. The other two, I simply got into a defensive stance and shuto to base if cerebral cortex. Nite nite! No wrestling, no rolling around, no muscling, no machismo. It is just unwise, to me, to go into an opponent leading with your head. With your back and back of head exposed. It makes no sense to me. A simply downward elbow can do a lot of damage. Once you on the ground, that's when 6 of buddies pop out. Cuz they are never alone.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Did/does the cop have a legal right, authority, probable cause, or "obligation" to just simply walk up to a car, open the door, and tell the driver to get out? Or is that a crime, an assault (when brandishing a firearm), a threat? The kid was not just pulled over for a moving traffic violation, he was sitting in the parking lot of a McDonald's eating a hamburger with his female passenger. The kid asked the cop "why?", did the cop tell him why? Was the car in park then kid put in reverse? If so, how and why did cop let him do that, didnt grab him? Or was it already in reverse? Doesn't the female passenger have criminal charges to file against the cop?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@JohnRodriguesPhotographer Woof!! How was a "hill" given instructions to do anything? Actually the battle took place on Breed's Hill. Plus there was no actual "infantry phalanx" taking place on either side. Stupid British General Howe, just had his troops march up the hill. A hill which was overgrown with brush, so it was not an easy task. The Americans (aka Colonists) just waited at the top and shot the shit out of the British. The British suffered a very high casualty loss (I forget the extent at this moment), a much higher than normal or acceptable percentage. The Americans were greatly outnumbered. They did what they could, shot their wad, then ran like hell. So in actuality it was a British battle victory. But we, Bostonians, consider it was a victory for us. It was psychologically, and in the long run. They high % of losses revealed what a buffoon General Howe was, and it gave a shot in the arm to the Revolution. That the Americans had a chance to defeat the British, the greatest military in the world at the time, if they used more "guerilla" tactics. The only, or just one of only few (I forget right now), time the Americans engaged the British in traditional open field battle was earlier on. Washington commanded the battle in Brooklyn, and nearly got wiped out completely and captured. He managed to salvage what he could of his command, got them across the river to Manhattan, then out of NYC area. After that, it was mostly small sneak attacks, war of attrition (thank you wilderness terrain), taking what we could, and haing the upper hand and outnumber the British when we could. Ex: Ethan Allen and The Green Mountain Boys hauling captured cannons from Ft. Ticonderoga in upper NY State, and moving them all the way to Boston .... IN WINTER!!!! Then Americans quickly setting up a cannon artillery site on Dorchester Heights in South Boston (not in Dorchester section of Boston). At dawn the cannons were pointed down at the British ships in Boston Harbor. The British fled Boston, ultimately to Nova Scotia, never to return. That was on "Evacuation Day" March 15th. There wasn't too much "velocity, shock, and firepower" on the part of the Americans, we didn't have it. Many of our victories, we simply caught the British "sleeping" and/or the British commanders were so incompetent. Plus many British troops didn't want to be there, and many of the hired mercenaries were Germans who didn't want to be there. Basically they got fed up with it. We had NO Navy, vs greatest Navy in the World. At most we had a handful of small coastal sailing sloops. The rest were just long boats, to row across a river. American troops probably had less than 50% support of the civilian population. Most didn't want their economic situation turned upside down. The British never committed the resources required. The long distance communication between Parliament/King George III and "the Colonies" was a factor. The Americans got very little support from outside, until at the very end. Lafayette came with some help, but most of the French troops that did come over spent most of their time "drilling" in Rhode Island. Lafayette, singularly, was a huge emotional catalyst due to his enthusiasm and dedication to Washington. We had our share of incompetent buffoons in command, to be sure. "Velocity, shock, and firepower" doesn't always result in victory. Just ask Queen Bodica. Estimated she had about 70,000 people against a Roman Legion amounting to...... (I forget now) ... I say no more than 700, may have been less. The Romans wiped out the Icenians. Queen Bodica and her 2 daughters were never seen nor heard of again.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
So the cop is claiming the kid assaulted him, and tried to kill him, with the car door as the cop stood within the open car door, and that the kid somehow managed to be slowly backing up the car. So the cop was in fear of his life, that is why the cop pulled out his gun and started shooting the kid? Fully justified? If the cop was so determined to get the kid out of the car, wouldn't he have just grabbed the kid and pull him out of the car after he opened the door? Why did he just stand there, with his left arm on top of the door and his right hand coming up to be on the top edge of door opening, telling the kid to get out of the car? Can't the kid claim that he was under an assault, and he was in fear of his life? Was cop dressed in uniform and on duty at time? A cop pulling his gun and shooting is a last resort. Clearly the cop had no regard for the kid, his female passenger, or anybody else in the area. Bullets can ricochet and hit innocent bystanders.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@nightwolf2851 but Dude, he tried to run the "officer" over w his truck, Dude. That's like attempted murder, Dude. The "officer" had no other choice, Dude. I mean, like, he couldnt have just stepped out of the way and let him drive off. He couldnt have NOT confronted him in the first place. He couldnt have just gotten him on video, called police, made a complaint of trespassing, and let the cops and court deal with it. I mean, come on Dude! Ler's get real here. The only choice he had was to blow the guy away!!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I'm trying to think of some of the major "pet peeves" or "social mistakes" in Japan (What's the French term, I can't think?) "faux pas"???? I think that's it. Ummmm ..... I believe that they do not shake hands (neither do I). Also, It may still be, that if you, as a man (gentleman) are courteous and permit a Japanese woman to go first, that that is not acceptable. In Japan, the women stay behind the men, the men go first. I think that sneezing, loudly, in public is looked down upon. I'd be in big trouble. I don't think that they like loud, boisterous, demonstrative people. So Texans would have trouble. One time when I was in London, I was talking to locals at hotel, and they said that they had problems with Texans. Don't talk about WWII. You have to remember, it is a very homogenous society, everybody doing the same thing, for many centuries. It was only "opened" around 1850 ("Gunboat Diplomacy").
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@VespasianJudea drought, famine, disease, flooding, storms, earthquakes, volcano (Pompei), changing environment, war, fighting, infighting, politics, and religion can all destroy a civilization. Look at all the abandoned places that have been unearthed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@BaskinginBarreto 19 I was about to say ....... Obamunist's intent was NOT to do a "hell of a job in his first year" [or any other year]. His intent was to transform America into a Socialist 3rd World hell hole State. One party, El Presidente for Life, no Sovereignty, open borders, eliminate the US Military, massive unemployment, massive welfare state, etc, etc, etc.. So, Bozo the Clown could have done a "hell of a job in his first year" compared to the Obamunist. I researched the Most Evil Women in World History. Hillary easily falls in the Top 5 if not the Top 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3
-
@ajmittendorf Hillary hardly did anything. She hardly went out to campaign or give speeches. She was "hold up" somewhere being "sick" with whatever it is she has. Her rallies were a joke .... hundreds or a few thousand showing up. Trump had tens of thousands, lines out the door, down the block, parking lots filled with people too. She spent alot of time in NH but still needed the SEIU to bus people up from MASS in order to win by a relatively small margin (she had to get those 4 votes). She spent alot of time in CA and with the Hollywood elite (getting those suckers to donate tons of money to her), in a State that she had locked and in which Trump didn't even bother to campaign. yes she was a brilliant strategist. She never saw WI or MI. She told everyone in WV to go to hell. She pissed off everyone in Indiana and even Ohio. She needed the Gov of Virginia to pardon tens of thousands of cons, and telling them to vote, and for Obamunist to tell illegal aliens you will not be in trouble if you vote illegally, in order to win Virginia. She needed transplanted pot heads from CA to win Colorado. Needed to bus in people from CA to win NV. She cleaned up in ALL of Northeast down to DC and Virginia, and on West Coast, and most major Cities, but still could not win. Thank you people in the "Rust Belt", Western PA (she won Pittsburgh), panhandle of Fl, Mich, WV, WI, Oh, Ind, Iowa, etc.. Western N. Carolina too. For pulling out those wins.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
TheLord SilverCockroach What the F are you talking about you twit? I don't think that US Troops are killing people around the world for their freedom. First off, we aren't killing people around the world. Second, in those places where we are killing people, we are NOT killing enough of them!!!!
No, I don't want to go back to Mickey D's, and I am not a fat hillbilly. I am not fat, and I live no where near where hillbillies live. I live in Boston, a city. Hillbillies are some 1,000 miles away from here. You stupid, dumb, delusional, brainwashed lemming of a Socialist buffoon!! Just keep on drinking the Kool Aid!!! Let the Government take care of you. Keep reading their propaganda. Keep getting that stipend and doing nothing to get that welfare money and government pension. You sound like a very productive individual.
You couldn't even answer my question as to who the hell Conchita Wurst is?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What is wrong with you people? You are striking at a nerve point or some other sensitive point which stuns the body and mind, or cuts off blood and oxygen. I knew a guy one time, all I had to do was grab/pinch at nerve on back of shoulder, below neck.
He went down in a shot, whole side paralyzed. Do it to me, nothing. Everyone is different. There is no mystery to nerve points, pressure points, tendons, cutting off blood and oxygen, etc. It is human anatomy. Study it, learn it. You are just apparently ignorant. That's why we have muscle bound, steroid up, meat heads instead if Martial ARTISTS and SELF DEFENSE Experts, rather than Self OFFENSE.
2
-
2
-
Parker Hetzel That is not true. Britain, an Ally, was fighting since Dunkirk in 1940. 1944 just means D-Day on June 6th, landing on Normandy. The US was bombing Germany for years, out of Britain. Also, drove Germans out of North Africa and Sicily and fighting them in Italy, long before June 6, 1944. As far as I know, Italy is part of Europe. Also, Canadians, Free French, other Free fighters from many European countries were fighting the Germans long before June 6, 1944. So you better study up on your history before you make a blatantly incorrect statement. That statement was as ignorant as if you had said "No American fought in WWII until Pearl Harbor Dec 7, 1941". There were many Americans in the British Royal Air Force, and fighting the Japanese in China "The Flying Tigers", etc..
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@N Esco Yes I've seen Ed Harris in "A History of Violence". But I thought his portrayal of the part was overdone. Make up overdone. Plus it was a short part. There are not too many photos or film footage on the real Whitey Bulger. You can search. He had this icy cold, sinister, sociopathic look in his eyes. He wasn't very tall, and often wore some sort of boots with "lifts" in them. He was strong and fit (except for his heart condition now), worked out, lifted weights. He never smoked or used drugs, and either he never drank alcohol or did very little. His thing was SEX!! With women, with men, young girls, young boys. Said he had sex with Actor Sal Mineo (spelling??) who was gay. He was killed by a couple of guys, I think pizza delivery guys, cuz he was gay. Something like that. He distributed drugs, ran guns to IRA in Ireland at least once. Robbed armored cars, exacted "tribute" from people all over. Most of the time it was just he, Stevie Flemmi, and Kevin "2 weeks" Weeks. That's it, the 3 of them. He had no big gang, no body guards, etc. The gang he took over, "The Winter Hill Gang" (named for the Winter Hill section of Somerville, MA) eventhough he was from South Boston (a fair distance apart), he ratted out or set up most all of that gang members to go to prison. He was a RAT!!! Whitey couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag nor could Stevie. Kevin Weeks,though, had been a boxer. There thing was they'd just gun you down later. Whitey usually used a machine gun, Stevie a sniper rifle (he was a sharpshooter, had been in the Army, I think it was. Whitey had been in the Air Force). We had a famous case of a bank robbed in Medford, MA. Local cops involved. Whitey got wind of it, figured out who involved, and just went to them and told them to give him the money ...... or else. All drug dealers in Eastern MA had to pay him "tribute". He paid off the cops, pols, and FBI. One gangster/drug dealer was once asked "why don't you carry a gun?" He answered "A gun isn't going to stop these guys". Whitey would just mow you down with a Machine gun. He once gunned down a guy, in daylight (I think it was), up against a building. Someone asked him "why'd you have to go and kill him like that?" Whitey answered "so everyone would know it was me." Gunned down 2 guys on Northern Ave, on Waterfront, in Boston right near where the NEW Federal Courthouse was built where Whitey was put on trial, found guilty, and given LIFE. I still believe he was involved with the Isabella Gardner Art Museum robbery of priceless art (some say worth $500 million).That was like over 25 years ago now. Still not a hint of where the paintings are. I believe there in some rich guy's mansion somewhere, that he commissioned the heist. So say Whitey had $20-40 million stashed away. Cops found some in a number of diff bank safe deposit boxes, under other names, all over. But I think he had/has stashed away in $1 million bundles all over. He was captured with some $822,000 in cash in wall of apt in Santa Monica, CA. So I figure a few years earlier he picked up a $1 million bundle. I'm sure there is still lots of money hidden out there. ... somewhere. But .... overall.... he was a GOOD GUY!! ..... Just misunderstood.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Right, a 17 year old "child". Yet if she murdered someone, she'd be tried as an "adult", imprisoned for life or executed. Or she could get married, have sex with her husband, get pregnant, give birth, and that would be OK with you, the Law, this Sheriff, and everyine else in Floruda.. Isn't that a bit hypocritical? So I wonder what this is really all about, what is really going on here. Who is being protected from whom, from what?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@autodidact7127 Well I could tell you about a case, but I can't tell you about the case because It would reveal too much. But I'll just say on the original complaint based on no problem cause no evidence no date no fact, the person was held on high bail and faced life imprisonment. Also person was arrested on no probable cause and no arrest warrant, on a complaint by a corrupt detective. Later an arrest warrant was typed up by a corrupt clerk in the court and stamped with a judge nane. A judge is required to sign an arrest warrant. It was a very involved case of corruption with many people involved. The person finally got freed when the person filed a writ of habeus corpus. But the person's constitutional rights to hearing on the writ did not occur (in violation of law). A short time after the person had a hearing before a state District court judge not of person's doing but the prosecutor's doing. Then suddenly that person was released. Where did all the facts and evidence and probable cause, which there never was, suddenly go to? It was all made up lies by the prosecutor standing up in court. One made up lie by the prosecutor was that the person committed crimes against the alleged victim 2 years before they ever met. Whoever the alleged victim was, who was never identified. They were all so corrupt that they told the superior court judge not to give the person the right to a hearing on the writ. Even though the person was brought into superior court before the judge on the writ no hearing was ever held, the writ never heard. The person was just taken out a court and locked backup again. All in violation of the person's Constitutional and civil rights under the US and State Constitutions. So they were afraid that the person's next step would have been a writ of habeus corpus to a US district court judge, who might listen to the person. One threat made by the prosecutor was "I'll keep you locked up for as long as I want. I don't have to bring it to the Grand jury until the 2nd sitting. (grand jury sits for 6 months at a time.) So the threat was to keep the person locked up for almost a year without getting an indictment, without having a preliminary hearing, without a trial. Based on false charges that the prosecutor knew to be false. Again no victim was ever named or identified no dates, times, places, witnesses, forensic evidence, alleged victim statement or complaint, audio tapes, video tapes, nothing. Solely on the complaint of a corrupt detective who was ordered to do so by another corrupt official. The reasons why are long and complicated and involved. The prosecutor just lied in court to judge and the corrupt judge went along with it and deemed that the prosecutor's lies and made up stuff was probable cause. I forgot how long the person was locked up, 9 months maybe. By now most of corrupt persons involved are dead or long retired. So this case happened a long time ago. In conclusion, nothing ever happens to people that the police and prosecutors use to lie and commit perjury in order to put away a defendant they know is innocent. All CYA. ****** I recall one more recent case in which a corrupt woman Judge and corrupt court officers and corrupt court clerk prevented federal authorities from entering court to arrest an illegal alien in the court on immigration charges. The corrupt judge ordered the court officers to usher the person out the back of the Court enabling the person to escape. I think the judge and one of the court officers were arrested by federal authorities on federal charges.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
But then again, back in the "Dark Ages" and before, there was no defined land area as "Scotland" of "Wales" or "Britain" or "England". There were lands upon which a various number of peoples/tribes lived, with different leaders, and perhaps a number of differing languages. If you had stood on top of Hadrian's Wall and yelled at the people to the North "you are all Scottish", they'd have looked at you like you were crazy. I believe the term "Britain" was coined by the Romans. London (Londonum) was coined by the Romans. Either on their first of second trip over. I believe the term "England" came much later, perhaps around or even after William the Conqueror. It was like Lawrence telling people they are all Arabs, and they ask "who are the Arabs?". They had never heard that term before, cuz they belonged to different tribes with different names. Or Columbus telling everyone you are "Indians" (although I guess that would have been in Italian). What is the saying? History is written by the victors. Or by the ones who can actually write. If you can't write, in any language, then you can't record history. Thus an ethnocentric view of history, and of what is right and wrong, comes into play. Ain't can't be helped.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dianeshelton9592 did I say anyone was being thrown out of cities? But when the power to be leaves, alot is lost, taken with them. Many Romans stayed, had already "retired", related to locals. But still alot of knowledge, skills, tools, materials, organization, administration, processes, education, training, wealth is lost. If everyone left London today, what would the rural population do? How would they fare? Would London be the same or fall into disrepair after a decade or so? Could you manage the electrical system, waste disposal, provide clean water? Same back then, knowledge and skills were lost. Also there was the climate, the climatic climate changes which occurred. Starvation, disease, depopulation. Most Brits had no writing, few could read and write in Latin. So if you can't read how could you read the operation manuals of London's power systems today? Farmers and hunters are not going to become architects and builders of great stone structures. It would be "wow! This is really nice, how did the Romans build it? How do we clean it? How do we repair it? Forget it.". When you are concerned with trying to stay alive, get enough to eat, the splendors of what the Romans left behind are your least concerns. I read once about British occupied areas of Africa. Maybe Zanzibar, where British had a port and large ships, and large cranes loading and unloading large crates, with many buildings, etc. British had many black workings handling all the goods and boxes. One time, one of the black workers asked the white Foreman "why don't we have cargo?". So why didn't the Brits, after the Romans left have "cargo"?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@roamiblu1833 about what? I was just conveying an example of how people like the security guard only hear what they want to hear instead of hearing the truth, facts, and reality. The security guard stated that Freddie did not have permission, authority, or a contract from Lowe's to take the pallets. That he stole the pallets. But that was not true, the Lowe's woman manager said he did have permission, authorization, and a verbal contract to take the pallets away. So the security guard only heard what he wanted to hear and only thought what he made up in his own mind to think. Not what the true facts and reality was. In example I conveyed, the jury Foreman had been a former police officer. So he only heard and believed what the police officer testified to, that pieces of the tail light were found in the dead guy's clothing. This is why it's so dangerous when people are so conditioned and brainwashed by government, schools, and cops, etc. Further in the case I cited, the defense had two vehicle accident expert wtnesses, w Phds, who had years of experuence working with FBI, testfy that deceased was not hit by a motor vehicle. The DA had some smuck from another State, or Canada (I forget exactly) testify. So several jurors only heard what they wanted to hear. They were conditioned to believe that the govt and cops are akways right. This is the dangerous thing. Clearly the security guard was of the same mindset. Clearly he was not in the right state of mind. ........ good thing, that in the case in this video, the jury came to the correct verdict.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@justinisorange Yeah but I know how to drive so why do I have to pay for a driver's license issued by the State just to give State government employee hacks a job.? I've been driving since I was eight years old. Do I need license to ride a horse to ride, a bicycle, a skate board, ride a donkey.? It is simply an income producing system by the State and an identification system by the Sate to keep track of and control over people. I think some States used to, and maybe some still do, requir your fingerprint to be taken and kept on record to get a driver's license. Do you need a license to eat food? There is nothing in the US Constitution about a right to eat food. Many States had laws that you had to pay money in order to vote. It's all about the "Benjamins" and govt hacks to have control over the populace so they can have a job w no heavy lifting and have immunity. Do you know how Irritating it is to government hacks to not be able to know who everybody is, where they live, what their name is, what their date of birth is, what their social security number is, what the fingerprints are, how much money they make, how much money they have, how much property they have, where they work? Like when Congress 1st passed the internal revenue service act in 1913, was it? I don't recall exactly. People, especially wealthy people, said it's none of the government's business how much money I make or how much money I have. Which is true. Shouldn't we the people be allowed to know how much money government hacks have, IRS employees make and have?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, yeah, sort of, in regard to your opinion of "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly". But it was still great!!!........."if you're going to shoot.. shoot, don't talk". One problem I had with the movie, was The Ugly kept calling Clint "blondie". Clint Eastwood didn't have blonde hair, he had brown hair. That never made any sense to me. But you must remember, it was a "Spaghetti Western", shot on the cheap in Spain, by Director Sergio Leone, with Italian actors.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Who the hell is Monica Belluci? Is she your girlfriend? To be truthful, I haven't known who Cheryl Cole is for all that long. I only first saw her on videos here on YT, as Judge on X Factor UK. I had never watched any of these "Gong Shows" before, cuz I figured they so bad. I never watched "American Idol" before, until this season (2015), and I was right, it is really bad!! Although J Lo is looking damn good!! At 45!! But only one person can really sing. None of the others would have ever made the cut on X Factor. But I was looking at music videos, songs, on YT, and I saw one Title to a video, off to the right. It was about 14 year old Shiane Hawke audition on X Factor Oz in 2012, I think it was. Her voice and singing just shocked me and blew me away!! So then that led to other audition videos from such shows, such as Amelia Lily and Cher Lloyd, etc. Then I saw Cheryl as Judge, and Dannii, and Scary, and Nicole. I had never seen Cheryl before. I knew who Scary was. Then I watched a lot of clips, and entire past seasons of X Factor UK and Oz, and some of X Factor US. But Cheryl got fired after only 3 audition episodes. Then I researched who she was, saw her first audition when she was 19, when formed girls group "Girls Aloud". I had never heard of them. Just a UK thing, apparently. Not known in US. Then I watched interviews of Cheryl on UK talk Shows, etc. I just love her accent and the way she talks, so sexy. Love her eyes. Love her skin and shape of her body. Love her hair most of the time. But what I like most about her, and even about Dannii, is her subtle, underlining, passive sense of humor and feistiness. That she really cares about what she is doing, about the singers under her charge. That she's a good person who has made some bad decisions and choices in her life, i.e. criminal charges, husband #1, husband #2, and that humongous horrendous tattoo all over her ass and lower back.. Yikes!! But I like her!! I like Dannii too!!! Both are gourgeous!!! So who is Monica Belluci? Never heard of her, never seen her.
1
-
1
-
+BBBYpsi Well I don't mind the shorter hair. But what has really turned me off about her now, is that she got so frighteningly thin!! She looks all skin and bones, and that has had her face look sunken and drawn. Also her beautiful "top" has started to "diminish", and that is not good. But now, 11/9/15. It looks like she may have put a few pounds back on, which is good. But at the beginning of this season, not only was she looking so thin, she was acting weird too. I'm thinking maybe she was popping diet pills or something. But, of course, as always, is that undeniable horrendous and humongous rose tattoo. Grrrrrrrrrrrr!!! Cannot deal with that at all. But she still has those warm, little, beautiful eyes and that sexy accent!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow!! The cop is untrained and inexperienced, and a coward. All the cop had to do was sit on him, in a "Full Mount" position. the guy is handcuffed behind his back. The cop is a pretty big guy, and weighty. The guy couldn't go anywhere, or do anything, if the cop just sat on him, and pinned his shoulders down with his hands.
Oh, he was banging his head against the wall, so he was a danger to himself, so we shot and killed him.
There was a case in Massaschusetts, it was on film. Some guy had a big kitchen knife and was out on a divided highway. I think it was the State cops. So there are the guardrails in the center divider. The guy was threatening to kill himself. he did try to attack, stab, or lunge at any cops. So the cops just shot him and killed him.!!!
This is how cops are, how they think. They are UNTRAINED in what to do when someone has a weapon, or any kind, other than to shoot them dead center in the middle fo the chest, and kill them. That is the totality of their training. This guy on the highway, with the knife, could have been easily disarmed and subdued, IF the cops had any trainging whatsoever. But they don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, it did kind of dribble down by that incarnation, now didn't it? Funny thing, not too long ago, I watched the original movie "Stargate" with a young James Spader. That odd fem guy, who played the alien "God like" character, Jaye Davidson only did 2 movies. "Stargate" and "The Crying Game" for which he was nominated for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. Then he just QUIT!! Went off to be gay, butched up, beefed up, lots of tattoos, short buzz cut hair, got older, and that's that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
My #1 is "Patton", # 2 "Bridge on the River Kwai". In reality, it didn't go like that. In fact, they didn't build the bridge very well. It didn't last, stand for very long. #3 "The Great Escape". # 4 "The Dirty Dozen". "Letters From Iwo Jima" was stupid. Also, one of my favorite movies is "Kelly's Heroes" - Clint Eastwood, Donald Sutherland, Telly Savales. Oh right, "The Longest Day", "The Battle of the Bulge", "Tora, Tora, Tora". "Guns of Navarone", "Where Eagle's Dare". Oh, there are just too many good WW II movies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
RedChiefAI But it's not a List of greatest events in WWII, it's a List of the Best made movies about WWII. There have been movies made about "The Battle of Stalingrad", they just weren't very good movies. As theatrical presentations, not in regards to the subject matter. Yes, "Stalingrad" was the greatest battle, the Germans screwed up royally. They wasted their time, efforts, resources, and materiel in trying to "level" Stalingrad at Hitler's orders instead of conducting the war. As the old saying goes... "Fortifications are monuments built to the stupidity of man". In this case, meaning Stalingrad was a Fortress, and the Germans were stupid in wasting there time trying to destroy it, instead of just going around it and destroying Russian military targets.
1
-
John Marist Britain IN in 1939? hum?? let me think on that. Germany attacked Poland on what? Sept 1, 1939. something like that. Britain stood by Poland under Treaty. But did Britain get IN to the war then. Humm? I forget. I know they did at Dunkirk, which was.............May 26 - June 4, 1940. So was Britain involved from Sept 1939 to May 26, 1940? Well info I'm getting is that Britain declared War on Germany on Sept 3, 1939. But does that mean they were IN the war? Not sure when they actually started fighting. I'd need to do more research. Unlike when the US declared war on Japan, we were attacked by Japan. I guess they call this period of time after Britain declared war on Germany and when the actually started fighting as "The Phoney War". Info says, Britain did some bombing raids on German targets. But they did not engage in any actually fighting until April 1940 in Norway, after Germany invaded and occupied much of Norway. Britain's fighting there and time there was short lived, and they evacuated back to England, leaving Norway to be occupied by Germany.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@N Esco Which was the response of the F***ing year? Ummm... "American Me" ... ok... ummm.... ok... I had remembered it before, now I forget. Hang on, let go look for it, at it, to remind me. I'm tired right now. Oh!! Oh yeah!! OK... Yikes!! Well that was a powerful, sick, and perverted movie. Frightening, they should make it required watching in schools for ALL teenagers. Then NONE would be in a gang or commit a crime, cuz they wouldn't want to go to prison. Shows you prison, especially in LA/Cal. is not a very nice place to be!!! Then had that big white creep actor whose been in alot of movies. Always playing bad guy, psycho. But in real life he's probably the nicest guy in the world. William Forsythe. I guess he's gotten a bit older now. But that was a scary movie. Funny, last nite I was watching video on YT about women in prison in CA. At Valley State Prison, I think it is called. How bad it is there. Then I watched a video, documentary on "Charles Bronson" (real name Mickey Peterson), the most dangerous prisoner in British prisons. I guess he is 65 now, still lock up. There is a movie about him, I think actor Tom Hardy plays him. I have DVD, think it is called "Bronson". That is a sick, perverted, brutal, violent movie. That guy is one sick SOB!!! Then I watched a documentary video on "Bonnie and Clyde". They delved into how they started and why. That Clyde had been in a prison farm in Texas, called "Eastham", I think, and that it was considered the most brutal prison in the country at the time, late 1920's - early 1930's. How Clyde hacked off 2 of his own toes just to get transferred out of there and to a prison hospital. He was a little shit, 5'7, 140 lbs or less. Then covered when they got machine gunned to death. They and car turned into Swiss Cheese. They said Bonnie had 53 bullets in her, Clyde 51, Car some 160!!! That was in....... 1932 I think it was. What was that movie with DiNiro and James Wood? :"Once Upon A Time in America"? But you have to watch the "Director's Cut" with the extra parts put in. Otherwise the damn movie as they released it in the theatre made no sense, at the end. I dunno, I'm a "Godfather I and II" man myself "Departed" wasn't that great, but good for a once see. But has not re-run at all. Jack Nicholson playing a "Whitey Bulger - ish" character. Alot filmed in Boston. But since they have built alot where they had filmed. I like the old gangster movies with James Cagney, George Raft, Edward G. Robinson. et als. Cagney in "White Heat" and "Public Enemy". Look for documentary on the REAL "St. Patrick's Day Massacre". When was that? 3/17/27, I think.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Boston, MA California couldn't be anymore screwed up if it tried. Oh wait.... it DID Try!!!! Moonbats!!! Awhile back, I conversed online with a woman, not from there, who got married and lives in a $3 million house in LA area. She loves the house, but can't stand the area or people. Talked w her during San Bernadino shooting. I just hope nothing happens to her. Also talked w a porn star, who complained about Gov Moonbeam and all the new Laws passed affecting porn industry. Also during wildfires. She said coyotes coming down out of the hills into town. Hot winds, fires, mudslides, earthquakes, oh yeah, great place to live. The only good thing to say about CA is that it is in CA.
1
-
@N Esco Pretty soon everyone in CA will be living in Reno or on Catalina Island. Actually, I got thinking about that gal who lives in Beverly Hills, and her two younger sisters, who live in London. I wonder how they are doing. Wonder if she's had a baby yet. I said she was married, right? Kinda too bad though, cuz I think she is a very good singer and would make a great actress. But I guess she gave it up when she got married. That was when she cut me off, when I prodded her to do something with her singing and get into acting. Cuz she has a close top Hollywood contact. But I guess she didn't want to "risk" it. Too bad. At least her sisters are trying to sing. I was in LA, down to SD, over to Tijuana when I was 14 years old, I think it was. That was a long time ago. I experienced that song first hand ... "It never rains in California, but girl don't they warn ya ... It pours .. man it pours" .... man oh man, did it rain!!! I wanna see Reno and Lake Tahoe. I have a nephew who lives in Vegas with his wife and kids. Governor Moonbeam!! Give me a freakin' break!! The guy is like 186 years old. Was Governor before back in the 1800's. The guy was a total space cadet before, worse now. Wants to make California into Norte California, Mexico. I say "DO IT", then the Dems LOSE the 56 (or how ever many) Electoral Votes Forever. I actuallly voted for Bernie Sanders in Primary, a strategic vote to try to knock out Crooked Hillary. Didn't work, oh well. Trump ONLY got 1 Electoral Vote in all of Northeast!! 1 from Maine. Lost all of N.E., NY, NJ, DE, MD, DC. But won PA with Western PA coming thru. Can't believe he won Michigan, even with all the fake votes and fraudulent vote tallies for Hillary. So many blacks simply did not come out and vote at all. I think Trump got more black votes than any Republican President. He should have won New Hampshire, but so many fake votes. We saw them being bused up from Mass. In the purple SEIU buses (Services Employees International Union) which is mostly illegal aliens. I had one of them, a woman harrassing me for 3 years!! She wanted an anchor baby. I guess George Soros didn't have control over enough voting machines. He'll have to spend some more of his 26 billion. He went from being worth $10 billion to $26 billion in 8 years under Obama. Not bad for owning a President of the United States, huh? He made an average of $2 billion a year!! Is that comparable to your pay? I had researched the Most Evil Woman in History. I think Hillary should be in the Top 5, if not the Top 3. Oh man, I really wish that one of her aides had filmed her in that Hotel Suite on the night of the Election results. Oh man oh man, She must have gone psychotic!! That video would have be worth tens of millions of dollars to that person. But then again, that person would have been found dead in a park in the middle of the night somewhere. Like so many others. Last count, over 50 people have died under questionable circumstances, who had some contact with Hillary or Bill & Hill. History will tell. Look how long it took before we found out who "Deep Throat" was. All the truths that have come out about JFK, LBJ, J. Edgar Hoover, Ted Kennedy, John Edwards, etc, etc. Time reveals all. Hillary is so crooked she needs a corkscrew to get into her pants suit in the morning!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
How is 17 a "child"? Here in Massachusetts, the legal age of sexual consent is 16. In Boston, 13 yr old girls are having babies. Maybe even 12 yr olds. Middle Schools have day care centers for babies of girl students. No male father of said babies are ever arrested or prosecuted. Let's talk about REAL life here people. But in Florida, the 17 yr old "child" can get married. Then it's OK for her to have sex with her husband. Isn't that just a wee bit hypocritical? What is actually intended to be protected, some delusion that females under 18 dont want and like to have sex? I first had full out sex when I was 15, no one ever got arrested or prosecuted or went to jail, and I was late to the game. So, IF an 18 yr old "woman" has sex with a 17 yr old male "child", and gets pregnant by him, then what? What about that big media case, older woman had sex with like a 14 year old boy. She went to prison. Didnt she have a baby by him? I forget. Then years later, and now, they got married. So why is it any business of the govts? Recently I saw a video about Pitcairn Island. One issue raised at the end was that the government, British?, was investigating the issue of young girls in the recent past and even further past having sex with males, men on the island when girls were as young as 12 or 13 years old. One older woman commented what's the problem. Intimating that it's always gone on like that on Pitcairn island for centuries. Or 200 plus years at least. She probably 1st had sex when she was like 12 years old. How far are you gonna go back to scrutinize a 1000 years, 10,000 years, a 100,000 years? When females of the species come of age to be viable to give birth then they get pregnant. That's how the human race continues to propagate and exist. Places like The Mariana Islands, it's common. During Victorian times the legal age of majority, to get married, and to consent to have sex was 21 years old. All based upon Christian religion and the church. So is Florida now wrong and criminal to have the legal age of sexual consent at 18, and not 21? Should all members of the Florida state legislature be put in prison? Which is right, what is right? Or is it no one's business except the 2 people who are engaged in sex? No business of the government, no business of the politicians, no business of the law, no business of the judge, no business of the prosecutor, no business of law enforcement, no business of the school, no business of any church, no business of any religion, no business of any parents, no business of any family members, no business of anybody else. Isn't there a right to freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of action, freedom of will? If it is the crime of rape then it is a crime of rape, then prove it to be rape? Otherwise it's nobody's dang business. Wanting, desiring, and consenting to have sex is not the same as rape. If it is not by force, threat, assault, kidnapping, drugging or some form of coercion. So in Florida, if some 17 year old female seduces some 18 year old male and says I want you to F*** me, then they have sex, the male can go to prison for life. Nice!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Yourepicgamer106 I always remember one episode of Law and Order: SVU, Olivia is on a rooftop and a teenage girl is having sex with a man. Olivia yells at the girl "It's illegal for you to have sex", or something to that effect. I was always like huh what?. How is it illegal for her to have sex? Under what law is it illegal for her to have sex? There may be law against a man having sex with a girl under 18, 17, or 16, or whatever it is in New York State. But I don't know of any law that makes it illegal for her to have sex. If there is such a law, and she does have sex, what would she be charged with and arrested for? Would she be prosecuted, put on trial, found guilty, and go to jail or prison? I'm pretty sure NOT!! Such hypocrisy. If a 15 year old boy and a 15 year old girl have sex together, are they both gonna be arrested and prosecuted for rape of a child or statutory rape? No? Why not? Around here in Boston, it was common for pilgrim and puritan men 30, 35, 40 years old to marry 14 year old girls and have babies with them. No one ever got arrested, put on trial, or went to prison. It seems to me that it bothers you and everybody else more than it bothers or effects the parties involved. Unless of course it is actually rape! But
nowadays you can just say hi or smile at a girl or a woman and she'll charge you with rape. Then women and girls start whining why no one will have anything to do with them. Now you need a contract signed and witnessed before you can even go out on a date.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
IF .... it is possible for something to travel faster than the speed of light, or there is already something that travels faster than the speed of light, then how would you know? Such a thing could not be observed or determined, because it IS going faster than the speed of light. Anything with any measurable Mass could not go faster than the speed of light, for a number of reasons. The energy required to make it go faster than the speed of light, the friction created, and collision with any stationary matter. So it would have to be something with no Mass, something other than light. So what would that be? Again, if there is anything, then it could not be observed, discovered, or known. If you were on the USS Enterprise, on "Star Trek", going many times faster than the speed of light, could you see anything? What would you see? Nothing but blinding light or nothing but darkness? Since you are going many times faster than the speed of light, then NO light from any direction could catch up to you or keep up with you. So again, would you only see darkness in all directions, or would you see blinding light forward (light you are running into) and darkness behind you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You have no idea how corrupt the cops, prosecutors, and judges are. They are all in it together, they all conspire together. What di you have? A public defender who also works for the same government that all of them work for. Maybe one out of a 100 judges is a good, decent, honest, and not corrupt judge. It may be impossible for you to find that judge or may take you ten-twenty-thirty or 40 years to find that judge. The judges are told what to do by the prosecutor and the police and the political higher ups. To cover their butts. It is only through a lot of mass media news coverage that anybody can possibly have a chance. Or take it to federal court, the US attorney, and the FBI. You can always file a Writ of Habeus Corpus in a US district court. I bet you that in all these cases, and all others like them, that the corrupt cops that did what they did and the lying perjuring witnesses were never arrested, charged, or prosecuted. They never are. All a cover up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@amandamoon3235 so suddenly a person turns 18 and they attain the wisdom of the ages? Ive known plenty of people in their 30s, 40s, 50s, & 60s who are complete morons and dont have the sense of a 12 yr old. So again ur arguement and position fails. All bassd upon some arbritary age set by the govt and politicians, ie 18 yrs old. Why not 17 1/2? As I had said, somewhere, it use to be 21 yrs old, age of majority, to marry, to vote, to sign contracts, to consent to have sex. So if a man, 21 or older had consensual sex w a 20 yr old woman, hed go to prison for statutory rape. Now he wont. Now it is 18. Some States legal age of sex consent is 17 or 16. So which is right? You're the self professed expert, u tell me. Why is it a serious felony to have sex with a 17 yr old in Florida, but it is not here in Mass? Arbritrary!! That is all. Why a crime in Victorian times to have sex w 20 yr old but not now? Cuz some politicians passed a law saying so? Maybe now legal age of majotity, for all matters, should be 16. If passed a law making it so, then youd be ok with that, right? Of course u would, cuz the govt tells u it ok now. So would you still whine and cry and complain? Just as w pot!! Many States, pot now legal. So thats ok with u, right? To me it is still illegal, criminal, disgusting and stupid. I have nothing to do with drugs or druggies, or drunks or alcoholics, or anybody who drink beer or wine. I don't even want anything to do with anyone who drinks coffee.!! Stupid and disgusting!! So again I ask what is it the business of the government, politicians, or the law? Why is it not just the business of the parents and the family to teach and train their children properly? I 1st had full blown sex when I was 15, and that was late for around here. I 1st had a heavy intense makeout session, no sexual touching or anything cuz we didnt know, when I was 8 or 9. So what business is it of yours or the government's? So is government gonna pass laws controlling what I eat, how much I eat? Why is it the government's business, why is it your business? So you just want the government and politicians and government employees to stick their nose into your business and to control every aspect of your life? You want the government to take care of you, and the government to think for you so you don't have to take care of yourself and you don't have to think for yourself? So you don't have to have the responsibility of taking care of your own children, that is someone else's fault when something goes wrong with them? What happened to the great cry "keep the government out of my bed, keep the government out of my bedroom, keep the government out of my uterus"!!? When it comes to abortion. Why not a new cry for those under 18, 17, or 16 "Keep the government out of my bedroom, keep the government out of my pants, keep the government out of my sex life"!! Hummm!!??? I have news for u, some human facts for u. Children grow older and they develop and mature and they get sexual urges and desires. There are no laws, no governments, no police, no judges, no courts, no parents, no teachers, nor even you, that can change that human fact and reality. Children and teenagers will have sex, they always have since the dawn of mankind. That is why we are all here. All you want to do is to control and stop human nature. Cuz you believe and are afraid that you're gonna have to have the expense of taking care of a lot of little babies. Well I get news for you, u already are.!! They're all over the place. So why dont u stop being so deluded and so controlled by the government, and so trying to ignore the reality of life. Fact: Young girls have sex get pregnant and give birth to babies. They've been doing it for over 200,000 yrs. Males of the human species, whether the same age as the young females or older males, have been the ones getting them pregnant. So get over it and get over yourself!! As I said somewhere here, in Boston, the Boston school system has daycare centers at middle schools and high schools where students girls come and bring their babies. Some of the girls are young as 12 and 13 years old. I know because I know a nurse who worked in the Boston school system and she told me all about it. Fact: All of your laws have not stopped young girls, young women under the age of 18, 17, or 16 from having sex with other young males under the same ages or older men, have they? They are having sex all the time all over the place. Some are getting pregnant and giving babies. All of ur laws havn't done one d*n thing to curtail that at all. You're deluded into thinking that all the laws have had any effect at all. So wake up and grow up!! All you wanna do is to make yourself feel better cuz maybe you didn't get any when you were a young teenage girl. Or maybe you were raped or sexually assaulted by some older man when you were young. If so, then that was a crime. But 2 people having consenual sex together whatever the ages is not a crime, it's consensual. It is natural, it is human nature, and it's not any of your g* d*** business. Unless you can actually show that a crime occurred by rape, kidnapping, assault, coercion, getting drunk, using drugs, etc etc etc. But the govt has a blanket law that nobody can have sex under the age of 18, 17, or 16 even if concensual, is absolutely absurd and ludicrous. It's a violation of constitutional, civil, legal, and human rights!!!! You may as well pass laws controlling breathing, sleeping, eating. In recent years I have heard there are places in certain States, jurisdictions, and schools where if a boy and a girl even kiss or kiss on the cheek or hold hands or touch in any way, then they're gonna be brought up on school discipline. They may be brought into court and charged with crimes. They be expelled, go to a juvenile delinquent school. "Zero Tolerance". Some places have gotten absolutely ridiculous. But it's OK for the government to allow in tens of millions of illegal aliens, bringing in diseases, like covid 19, crime, and poverty, and costing us millions or billions of dollars? Committing crimes against Americans, murdering Americans. But that's OK with you I'm sure!! Cuz the government says so and it's politically correct and acceptable. Wake up and get your head out of the sand!! You ignorant, brain washed, controlled twit!!! In Mass, I believe Sodimy and .... oh what is it called? ..... umm??? .....not bigomy .... ummm .... when an unmarried man and woman have sex ...... are still crimes on the books.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@amandamoon3235 So that includes 18 year olds, correct? 18 is old enough to drive a car, buy a car, own a car, vote, go to college, join the military, make contracts, get married, get an apartment on your own, but not old enough to have a romantic relationship with an older man? Hummm??? I must have missed the meeting when you were appointed God of the World. Since most women have serious daddy issues and complexes, and tend to prefer older men. I believe one or more states you can still get married at 14 with parental consent and court approval. But that isn't as good as girls getting pregnant at 13 and 14 years old, and having babies, with day care centers in middle schools, now is it? Cuz that's how It should be, that's the way to go, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ColonelCarnage I wish some TV channel had been running a soap opera, parrallel day by day of what it would have been like if Hillary had won, what she would have done. Open borders, US Border patrol adn customs shut down. 30% + unemployment. TPP, or whatever it called Signed. US Military decimated. 500K+ Syrian refugees and terrorist (and from elsewhere) let into country. Mass shootings, bombings, rapings, murders. More jobs, mfg, companies fleeing USA. More money shipped overseas. Race and Class wars going on all over country. Credit tight, shortages, etc, etc, etc. 2nd Amendment gutted, ATTEMPTS to confiscate ALL 400+ million GUNS!!! Elections rigged. Soros in charge of ALL Election machines. Orwell's "1984" would be here, then onward to Huxley's "Brave New World" of "Utopia". Hillary getting paid off and bribed every step of the way. Oh yeah, it would have been great. What island country would she have bought or made arrangements to live in protected as part of her "exit strategy"? Cuba? Dominican Republic? Grenada?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This was a ridiculous video. Most of what u said had nothing to do w title of video. Why is DDs a reason NOT to move here? Most of what u said had no basis in truth, fact, or reality or was totally wrong or made up by u. Top 10 readons NOT TO MOVE HERE ...1. High taxes n regulations. Legislature will tax anything, even tax a tax!!; 2. Corrupt govt n politicians, too many useless govt hacks; 3. Corrupt judges n courts; 4. Too many moonbat liberals, legislature is like 84% Dems; 5. Too many illegals n welfare deadbeats n bums in the strrets n druggies; 6. Too much crime, alot goes unreported, Organized Crime..... oh wait I already said politicians; 7. Weather, hot n humid Augusts, Winters can be brutal. "If u dont like the weather in Boston just wait a minute; 8. People here are the worst. Unfriendly, awful people; 9. Pretty expensive to live here; 10. Too many damn foreigners!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I remember seeing 1 video, 1 time, on here, anumber years ago. It was in a Southern State community,. An elderly woman was shooting her gun outside her back door, supposedly at a prowler,. The police came, looked around, everything clear. They asked her where the gun was, she gave it to them. They reloaded for her and gave it back to her. If that had been here in Massachusetts, the cops would have arrested her, taken her gun and ammo away from her, and she probably would have spent the rest of her life locked up in an institution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RWOner666 Ever watch videos of citizens in "red states" defending themselves with guns? Some are incredible. 1) 18 yr old mother of an infant, her man just died of a disease like a month earlier. Living in a trailer. 2 punks with guns breaking into her mobile home. She on phone with police, they give her ok to shoot. She shoots and kills one of them, maybe wounded the other. Later 2nd punk turned himself in. 2) Punk robbing a farm home, set back from road. Only 12 year old boy in house. Punk basically ignores him, pushes him around. Punk grabs clothes hamper, fills with stuff in house to steal. Leaves house, walks up long drive to gate/fence. Boy gets gun, fires at him 12 times, misses on first 11, hits him in back of leg with 12th, climbing over fence. I think it was a magnum or hollow point. "Blue state": You can't do anything. Runaway if you can. Else give in, get robbed, raped, and murdered. Liberal politicians satisfied.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You are so ignorant and naive as to how cops are, what they do, and what their objective is. The cop wants to be super cop of the month, he wants to arrest a wanted black guy, he wants to shoot and kill a black guy. He wants to put money in his pocket... Maybe they want to shoot and kill the black guy and then rape the black woman. You dont know what's going on in the mind of these corrupt criminal psycho cops. Most cops couldn't pass a psycho exam if they were handed the question n answers. All you know is you are faced with 1 or 2 guys with guns, handcuffs, nightstick, flack jackets. Telling you to do something you don't want to do or you don't have to do. Accusing you of committing some crime which you know you did not commit. Once you allow them to handcuff you, they can do anything they want to you. They can beat you, blind you, kill you, homosexually rape you, plant drugs on you. And there's not thing one you can do about that. So wake up and grow up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Assault with a dangerous weapon resulting in bodily injury, pain, and suffer (i.e. sprayed with pepper spray), assault with a deadly weapon (pointing gun at him), Conspiracy (with other officer), assault and battery (kicking and punching, whatever they did, once he out of the car), Civil Rights Violations, Kidnapping. But one point to make, the Temporary Dealer Plate was inside the back window (dark tinted window) up high to the right. It was NOT on the plate holder in the center of the back tailgate door where it should have been. I think in some States, he'd be pulled over just because his windows are tinted TOO DARK!! Many States have Laws against how dark windows can be tinted. Those looked pretty dark.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So many great TV show characters are missing. Perry Mason, Fin from SVU, Munch from SVU, Barney Fife, Edith Bunker, Jeannie (I Dream of Jeannie), Matt Dillon (Gunsmoke), Kwai Chang Caine (Kung Fu), Superman/Clark Kent, Emma Peel (The Avengers), Vera (British female Columbo), Andy Sipowicz, The Beaver, Alf, Capt Kirk, Spock, McGarrett (Hawaii Five-O), Schultz (Hogan's Heroes), the lead guy from TV show "Life" - 2 seasons, Lagertha on "The Vikings", Cameron/Terminator on "The Sarah Connor Chronicles" - 2 seasons, Cara on "Legend of the Seeker" (2 seasons), Hanna (show same name), Humphrey Appleby - Asst to Minister/Prime Minister on "Yes, Minister/Yes, Prime Minister", Morse (British TV show), Louie on "Taxi",
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UpsidedownC the women mgr explained it all. Freddy had permission to take the pallets. But this security guard decided that he didnt, that he was stealing them, so he ordered Freddy off property, that he was trspassing. Yes they do care about pallets, they are trash. They cant just let them pile up. They take up space, are a hazard, attract rats and mice. So it's easier and free to let someone take them than to have to pay someone to take them. Duhh!! "Gee! I didn't think of that because I'm a liberal, and I only think what I'm told to think." So it's fine with you to have a thousand old, dirty, broken, soaking wet, rotting, mildew pallets piled up?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@makevideos4985 yes he does. Police, and employees, should be criminally charge as well. The two employees made up a hotel policy or rule or restriction which didn't exist and only applied to him because he was black. It did not apply to other white people or white guest in the lobby at the same time. He was a paying registered guest at the hotel and under the contract and under law he has a perfect right to sit in the chair in the lobby of the hotel. The two employees just lied to him and made up what they said to him because they believed he was a black man from outside the hotel, from the street, and that he was not a registered paying guest. Even though he produced proof that he was a registered paying guest. As soon as he produced proof that he was a registered paying guest with a key card, they should have apologized and walked away. What legal basis did police have to comply with the wishes and demands of the two employees to remove him from the lobby and from the hotel? When he is a registered paying guest with a key card? So you are saying the police must do whatever employees of a hotel tell them to do? Eventhough there no legal basis to do it, and that the police must remove any person from a hotel white, black, Asian, or Hispanic that the employees want them to remove? a registered paying guest with a keycard who is just sitting in a chair in the lobby? the guy violated no law, committed no crime, violated no rules or regulations or restrictions of the hotel or its policies, breached no terms of the contract of his room rental. The two employees just made up what they said because they wanted to throw him out of the hotel simply because he was black. [Note:. 2 employees were fired. Proof that there was no such hotel policy as they asserted]. Perhaps he was dressed down and his appearance looked like he walked in off the street. They didn't even consider that he had a key card and was a registered guest. So of course he can sue the police and can also file criminal charges against the police and the two employees. Hate crime, conspiracy to violate civil rights, assault, kidnapping, etc. not to mention the hotel cheated him for the room. It stole his money that he paid the rent the room. Breached contract.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@realbaconoverlord There were two things that I had always seen in court over number decades. 1) a person being charged and arrainged for resisting arrest when he's never charged with any other crime. So what crime was he being arrested for in the first place for which he was charged with resisting arrest? That point was never raised or clarified and the person is always found guilty of resisting arrest. 2) somebody being charged with burglary or robbery AND receiving stolen property, at the same time, same incident. So how can one person be both the person who stole the property and be the person who received the stolen property? If u stole the property then u didnt receive the stolen property? I only read about this issue being brought up in a case just a little whike ago. Where the Court ruled that one person can't be both. But that situation had gone on for ages. Your ignorance of the laws and what actually takes place in their application is astounding. There was one case here in Massachusetts, I think the name was "Alegata". Something like that. It was a 1st Amendment freedom of speech case. The person was being loud or yelling and screaming inside the old Filene's department store or Macy's department store in downtown Boston. The person was arrested for disorderly conduct or disturbing the piece or something like that. The essence of the high court's ruling was that speech, no matter how loud, upsetting, or disturbing, cannot be a crime, and you cannot be arrested. So the only thing the department store, security, police could do was try to quiet the person or just escort person out of the store. This case was 1 of a number of cases that tore apart Massachusetts disorderly conduct laws. The one I love in recent years i've seen a number of times is when cops arrest somebody for NOT answering their questions and NOT talking to them, the cop. NOT Giving name, address, date of birth, producing a driver's license. The one I love is the video on YT here with cops arrested an older blind guy for walking down the sidewalk in broad daylight with a folded up walking cane in his back pocket. They arrested him for illegal possession of a dangerous weapon. Maybe also for refusing to identify himself and answering their questions. But of course you have no problem with any of that. You just do what you're supposed to do and you'd be submissive and subservient, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ShonMardani that's how long it takes for the Earth to revolve around the Sun. It isnt exactly 365 days, 24 hour days. Has nothing to do with how much daylight there is. In like medieval times, they thought 1 year was like 360 days, or something less than 365. So they experienced "calendar slip". So the next January 1st was actually December 27th, and then the next year, January 1st was actually December 22nd, etc. So be skeptical of historical dates. So this extra .24 days is why we have a leap year, a February 29th, every four years. To keep the calendars straight. It is what it is, You can't do anything about it, you can't change it, so live with it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, originally, all the Monks did was sit around all day and meditate, etc. They got no exercise. They were very passive, and thus very weak in their body. This also made they easy victims to attacks by Warlords, bandits, etc. So when Bodidharma arrived, he whipped them into shape!! Developed exercises, principles, theories, and techniques which became the foundation of the Shaolin martial art. Again, he was from India.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What about the Catastrophe that hit Britain (and most of World) around 535 A.D.? Which caused Britain to become "Dark"? Years of no Summers, Winter almost year round, little or no tree and vegetation growth, Sun blocked out, famine, etc, etc, etc? No doubt the population of humans and animals decreased. So it was called "the Dark Ages" for a reason, because for a portion of it it was in fact "Dark". These are the years King Arthur was supposed to have lived in the SW of Britain. As the Prof toward the end suggested, I suspect that King Arthur was a made up "hopeful" story. Perhaps a composite of a few or several different men/leaders from different times. An "ideal" to be shown to all. When was King Arthur first mentioned? What were the conditions in Britain at that time? It is simple to say "Hey, look, this is what a King of Britain was like back then, so this is what a King of England should be like today.". Often times, a work of creative fiction takes on a life of its own, without explanation. The populace simply seizes upon it. They make it their own, they make it real.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I took french in school but can't speak it. I don't have an ear for languages. When I got older I tried learning some japanese. I don't speak any spanish even though I'm surrounded by spanish speaking people. I don't think any of my brothers or sisters speak any foreign language either. My father spoke french. His father was an attorney who spoke a lot of languages. I saw his report card in colleges. He got all A's in latin, greek, classical greek, french, spanish, german. My Uncle speaks German cause he got a World War II German war bride. He ended up a colonel in the army reserves. So 3 cousins speak german.. My niece speak spanish. One time, a long time ago, I knew this rich guy from brazil. I saw him go in and out of six different languages in like two minutes. Standing their talking to different people. I think it was english, portuguese, spanish, french, german. That's five, hummm??? Maybe italian also. I just stood there, I was flabberghasted. Oh is that a german word? I know of these 3 sisters. I had spoken with the oldest one extensively online a number of years ago.. They are british and german but they sound like americans. They grew up living in many different countries. They speak several different languages. English, German, Russian, Ukrainian, slovak, polish, and some others. They never went to school, they were home schooled by their parents.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheBerylknight Cops get suspicious anytime they want to for no reason at all. They just make it up to suit themselves. "I want to search this guy for drugs so his behavior is suspicious so i'm gonna search him". That is what it boils down to. That is what it's all about. The cop wanted to know who he was, wanted to see his official government identification, wanted to run his name for warrants, and wanted to search him for drugs and guns cuz he's black. because he's hoping to make a big arrest. So he could be super cop of the day. None of what you said at the beginning of your comment was any legal grounds for suspicion or probable cause that the black guy in the passenger seat had committed any criminal offense. If sweating while sitting inside a car was grounds to be suspicious of the commission of a crime then people will be getting handcuffed and search and arrested all Summer long. Under the Constitution and laws the black guy sitting in the passenger seat does not have to talk to the cop, answer the cop's questions, give his name, present any identification, roll down his window, get out of the car, allow himself to be handcuffed, nor be searched or anything. He has a right to ignore the cop, he has a right to remain silent. So is it your belief that exercising your constitutional and legal rights is suspicious of the commission of some crime? Thereby giving the cop probable cause to bring the guy out of the car, handcuff him, and search him? That's amazing, I really feel very sad for you. How about this alternative? How about the cop minds his own g** d*** business and keeps his mouth shut? Did you ever consider that?. What the other cop does with the woman driver on whatever driving violation, and once that's done, they drive away. Simple!!
1
-
@TheBerylknight " So if you want to avoid suspicion be cooperative....." wow!! Is that what you teach your daughters? How does not being cooperative with a cop create suspicion and probable cause of the commission of a crime in the mind of the cop.? It is created by the cop in his own mind, of his own doing, and has nothing to do with a person not cooperating with the cop. That's the same as saying oh you're defendant in a criminal case so you'd better testify on the stand otherwise the jury is going to be suspicious. They are going to think that you're guilty because you didn't cooperate with the prosecutor. Cops will make up anything in their own mind, to do whatever it is they wanna do, or which they are ordered to do by their superiors. They will lie about anything. The cop just wanted to search the black guy for drugs because he saw him sweating in the car and believed he was on drugs.. So he's gonna find drugs on the guy and arrest him. In the cop's mind sweating means he's on drugs, means he's carrying drugs. Means I have to get him out of the car anyway I can. Lie to him, make up any kind of story, so I can search him and find drugs.. Then then arrest the woman driver, then impound the car. Then we sell the car at auction, then we make money. After all he's a black guy so he must be carrying drugs. If the passenger had been a white seventy year old man, would the cop have done what he had did? Of course not. Wake up and smell the coffee burning on the stove. Come into the real world.
1
-
1
-
@TheBerylknight By the way i'm in Boston, i'm white, and i'm 63 years old. When younger I had worked for a time as a private investigator. So I dealt with cops and lawyers, and being in court, a lot. I've known many corrupt cops. My older sister was married to a cop, his father was a corrupt b**** cop. Cops are, or were years ago, mobbed up around here. Oh and I am not a liberal, I am more to the right, conservative. but I'm an independent. I'm a strict bill of rights-ist. I love it when a corrupt cop finally gets bagged. They whine and they cry. "Oh they have to have special treatment, you have to be leaning with them, they need to be protected."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheBerylknight "[T]he term 'brandish' means, with respect to a firearm, to display all or part of the firearm, or otherwise make the presence of the firearm known to another person, to intimidate that person, regardless of whether the firearm is directly visible to that person." 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(c)(4). So .... I do know what "brandishing" means. Apparently you do not!! It does not mean to take the gun out of the holster and point it at someone. That is assault with a firearm. If you shoot someone and wound them, that's assault and battery with a firearm, and may also be attempted murder with a firearm. So a cop having a firearm, handgun, in his holster, visible to another person, is "brandishing" a firearm. By definition, it is an intimidation and a threat, if a person feels threatened by it, whether or not the cop intends in to be a threat or intends to threaten person. The threat is a constant. So again, No! I did not lie!! You are just ignorant, and apparently Pro Cop.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@010les OK, a little difficult to read and understand. I live in the Netherlands. What liberal countries have royally fucked up is that everyone is allowed to be themselves. No matter how much that person is a dick [dickhead]. There are no moral ground rules here, because [cuz] individuality, no matter how rotten [nasty or distasteful], seems to be the most important Right. Duties [to country, society, law and order, family, etc,} are basically non-existent. Catholic Church. ...... yet people are respectful and helpful to anyone, even complete strangers. ....... ultimate freedom ..... because [cuz]. Tolerating everything, because it's our freedom, is going to cause serious issues sooner or later.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aolvaar8792 I already said. A militia is made up of good citizens, usually local, who bring their own guns and supplies. They are not paid by any govt or army. In fact, the militia act REQUIRED all able bodied males over 18 ( I think it is 18-45) to be in the militia, and REQUIRED them to bring their own gun, shot, powder, and kit pack. Why don't you READ, study history, read the US Constitution and subsequent relavent acts and laws. Instead of listening to leftist propaganda. That is why I am so member of the militia and have been since I was 18. It is none of the business of the govt, they have nothing to do with it or to say about it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidburgess3882 yes it is nice that we have 1st Amendment freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and to petition govt for grievances. Nice we have 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. So I shall assume that since you have no problem with govt infringing on people's 2nd right that you would have no problem with restricting 1st Rights? Hummm? Requiring licenses, fees, background checks, special training to speak, practice religion, open a church, write and publish something, run a newspaper, now would you? Oh wait! What's the difference? Though there are some govt restrictions on speech .... 7 deadly words (actually more than 7).
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidburgess3882 in 1790 just about everyone did own a gun, as you say ... To hunt. You keep harping on these selective words you use ... "Organized", "regulated'. A militia is organized and regulated once "good citizens" come together to form a militia. It is not organized nor regulated by the govt. You seem incapable of grasping that. As for women, slaves, ex slaves, non whites ... at the time it was run by white males, you know that. But now all over 18 are included. After 1865, ex slaves had to fight for their right to own and carry guns, to buy their own home and land, to work many died, went to prison, were indentured servants. Many court cases and laws and Amendments in regards to ex slaves and blacks (as well as other races).
1
-
@davidburgess3882 under your questioned requirements to own a gun, then most cops should not carry a gun. Out of any job or profession, cops have the highest incidence of drunkenness, alcoholism, illegal drug use, abusing wife and children (and women in general), violence towards women and others, divorce, mental illness, and suicide. More cops commit suicide than any job, and you think it is perfectly fine for them to carry a gun just because the govt says so, cuz they are a govt employee? Wake Up and smell the coffee burning on the stove!!!
1
-
@davidburgess3882 A simple quote from the TV show "The Sarah Conner Chronicles", when the hot young Terminator chick was in a library late at night researching something. She was there alone with a regular geeky guy. At one point he saw that she carried a large auto handgun. He asked her "Why do you carry this?". She just looked at him in her deadpan expression and said to him in her monotone voice "In case I need it.". That is what the 2nd Amendment is all about...... "In case we need it". To defend ourselves, our family, our home, our friends our neighbors, our community NOT ONLY against criminals who may do us harm, but more importantly against s corrupt govt, govt officials, military, and police who may seek to strip us if our rights, property, freedoms, lives, and happiness for their own lust for power and greed for money. Else, we become Soviet Union/Russia, China, Nazi Germany, Cuba, North Korea or any of the numerous tyrannical govts or dictatorships that there are now in the World or have been in the past. That is why we fought the Revolution against the tyranny of the English King, govt, and Army. I am certainly not going to stand by and permit the ilks like you to tear down all that was fought for and created. Fought for in numerous wars. My father and uncle fought in WWII. Many have fought and died to defend and protect this Republic and the Constitution. What have you ever done but to try to tear it all down and turn this country into a leftist, liberal, socialist, Marxist, communist state with a $30 + billionaire Hungarian communist as your head - calling all the shots, pulling all the strings, and owning & controlling many or most politicians in Fed and State govts? I hope you enjoy the gulags, work camps, reeducation camps. I've known people who have come out of Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge, and out of Vietnam. My aunt was German, lived thru Nazi Germany and War as child and teen (no she was not Jewish). I've known many people who have come to America to be FREE. All you want to do is tear down those Rights, and freedoms, and safeguards against tyranny. Why? The 2nd Amendment, the right of people to own and carry guns is one safeguard against the tyranny of govt and police. Do you seriously want police to break into your home, rape your wife and daughter, murder you and your family all for the sake of being PC? Don't tell me "oh that can't happen here). It happened here prior to Revolution, it happened in Germany, in Ireland, in Northern Ireland, in many countries where people said "oh that can't happen here.". What is the one thing that they did not have which we do have? The 2nd Amendment, The right to keep and bear arms!!! Without it, it would not be long before you would lose all your other rights. In those countries private citizens had no right to own a gun. Some may have had a gun for shooting or hunting (as in England today). Do you have any idea how rampant crime is in England. They use knives, clubs, chains, machetes. Police don't even carry guns. Only the special armed and armored units do. So criminals are free to run wild. I've been to England many times, had a few close run is with some punks. But I dissuaded them. Missed a shooting in Soho late at night by about a min. Twice saw dead body in the street.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Or just do a Dbl Achilles lock, Bridge him up, turn him over onto his front, and do a "Boston Back Breaker". But before that, if you have the opportunity, slide a hand up along his body to his face and poke his eyes (in real life not in dojo or tournament match). If he can't see you it limits his ability to get you. Also when instructor was grabbing guy's head w his right hand around neck, take your middle finger and push hard at spot just under earlobe and at back of jaw bone. Push very hard, it will cause excruciating pain, and could possibly knock him out if he doesn't wriggle out of hold you have on him and gets off you. Getting out of his domination on top of you is good, turning the tables on him and getting dominant over him is better. But what you really want to do is end it (in real life attack in street) so you can get up and walk home. You have to blind him, knock him out, choke him out, or control with some painful lock so that you can wrap him up or knock him out, or injury some part of one leg do he can't run after you. You do not want it to turn into a brawl. Don't fight the same fight twice. Further, out in the street there is a good chance he is not alone. He may have 1 - 6 buddies around with him waiting to beat the crap of you or kill you with club, knife, or gun. You don't want to wrestling around on the ground. Once you draw his head closer, you can do an Eagle's Claw to front of his neck and control and/or crush his larynx. You can also possibly knock him out, at least daze him, with a Right Ridgehand Strike to back of neck, at base of cerebral cortex. Again, these are for real life, life and death, on the street NOT in a tournament match. As instructor showed, you want to try to in his right are so he can't reach out and bridge in the floor. Also try to pin his right leg, foot/ankle and knee so he can it move his knee forward and out to bridge on floor. As he is doing at about 3:28.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@capbeach8601 oh! Well you assumed wrong. I never heard of this show, saw this show, or heard of this woman until I just stumbled onto this video. But I have seen all of "Vera" at least twice. DCI down to Sgt is a wee bit of a drop. How many ranks? 2? British Police ranking confuses me. We have Uniformed patrolman, sometimes a 2 stripe "corporal" rank although I dont believe anyone calls it that, then sergeant, lieutenant, captain. Detective, detective Sgt, lieutenant, captain. Then some large city police departments may have inspector, et cetera, deputy chief, chief, deputy commissioner, commissioner. Which may use the military insignias of major, lieutenant colonel, colonel, brigadier general.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1