Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. Of course we went to the moon, there's not a single argument that Sibrel offers against the moon landings that stands up to reasonable scrutiny.
    3
  2. He lies through his teeth.
    3
  3. No astronaut has said the moon landings didn't happen. Watch the full discussion, not just a clip that removes context (aldrin was telling Zoey he didn't know why we hadn't gone BACK.)
    3
  4. Whatever Bart wishes becomes his reality.
    3
  5. He imagined he escaped them and it was true! A miracle.!
    3
  6. Sibrel has stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    3
  7. Some on the right are just as prone to fall for extreme narratives that appear to fit their ideology as some on the left.
    3
  8. All of Sibrel's claims have been refuted. Sibrel recently said that he will not debate anyone who has the knowledge to challenge his claims. He only does interviews with people who haven't seriously studied the Apollo program.
    3
  9. There isn't a single person who's studied the Van Allen Belts who says that they were impassable for the Apollo astronauts. The Saturn v third stage only had to change the velocity of itself and the other components (Command &Service module and the 2 lunar vehicle components), to raise them into an elliptical orbit the lowest point being low earth orbit and highest point being the moons orbit. After that, very little fuel is used to get into lunar orbiter.
    3
  10. You make baseless allegations against people without evidence. What an evil woman.
    3
  11. 15. The crosshairs in the cameras were etched into a glass plate called a Reseau plate in front of the photographic film. It allows examiners to see whether the film is warped, determine sizes from angular resolutions etc. These lines are pretty thin. That means that they can disappear if you make a bad or lo-res scan, or if the light into the camera is bright.
    3
  12. Sibrel is not particularly honest with his claims. Anyone can recreate his favorite lunar photos of rocks and shadows to prove to themselves how deceptive perspectives can be. In short, the photos are genuine, even though to some people they don't look quite right, especially with Sibrel in their ear confidently proclaiming them faked.
    3
  13. @billieu.uuu555tuu8  "see it"? In person? How much of the world, how many world leaders, have you seen in person?
    3
  14.  @billieu.uuu555tuu8  Sibrel spins a good story, but it falls to pieces if you actually do the work to investigate his claims.
    3
  15. And how about the confirmation of the existence of the landing sites from Lunar orbiting spacecraft from China, India, Japan and South Korea?
    3
  16. Do you question Sibrel's claims?
    3
  17. You have been indoctrinated, but you don't see it.
    3
  18. Aldrin has never said they never went to the moon. Armstrong didn't like being called a fraud and a liar by people (like Bart) who got to him through fraud and lies.
    3
  19. Sibrel tells the lies that the gullible want to hear. So they never bother to check his claims against any evidence other than Sibrel's "evidence".
    3
  20. Sibrel likes to quote Twain: "It is easier to fool people than convince them that they have been fooled" None of the people who buy his stories consider the possibility that he's the one doing the fooling.
    3
  21. Wise not to believe it. Spacecraft from China, India, Japan and South Korea have confirmed the existence of the landing sites. Sibrel recently said that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    3
  22. No, he did not. He did produce 2001: a space odyssey. Perhaps that's the movie you had in mind.
    3
  23. "Will do some research and decide for themselves". If they want to do research, I suggest Dave McKeegan, who addresses Sibrel's claims directly, and Tim Dodds, who does one of the most thorough analysis of such claims that I've seen. Sadly, few people who buy the stories of the Sibrel's of this world do any such research.
    3
  24. So Sibrel's fooled you, what's your point?
    3
  25. You don't have the skills to understand the simple physics of motion.
    3
  26. I would hope you would have more respect for Tom Stafford than Bart Sibrel. The reality of the moon landings is supported by the hundreds of thousands who worked to achieve them. Bart Sibrel's story is supported only by a tissue of his own lies.
    3
  27. The Challenger disaster that killed Christa McAuliffe happened in 1986, over a decade after the last Apollo moon mission.
    3
  28. Nasa will fight to maintain their budget just as any bureaucracy, in the private or in the public sector, will.
    3
  29. Strange, I've done the fuel calculations, and math says that they had the fuel required. Are you sure you were using the correct delta V's, Isp's, and propellant ratios in your calculations?
    3
  30. Grifters like Bart also need trickery, to generate income.
    3
  31. Sibrel has stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    3
  32. Why is there a pressure gradient in the atmosphere?
    3
  33. Did you watch the entire Apollo 11 press conference, or just some selective editing?
    3
  34. @sebastianellis6110 to most people they look initially nervous but soon became more relaxed with the situation.
    3
  35. An excellent debunking of Sibrel's film, from Humans of Earth/Gempanda: https://youtu.be/8aP_z8F10oQ?si=zjhrEt9E0u3U9-il
    3
  36. Your comment is complete bs.
    3
  37. Name these two guys.
    3
  38. Sibrel has produced just 2 films, both denouncing the Apollo missions. In the first he recorded no footage, it was all footage from other people, mostly Nasa. In the second he produced most of the footage, but that footage was just interviews, requiring no professional camera skills. Sibrel is a charlatan, his claims other people providing evidence to support his views are unsupported. The shots in transit to the moon he claims as secret, are actually from broadcasts done live at the time! A 15 minute TV broadcast on day 1 and a 35 minute broadcast on day 2. If you click my thumbnail you should be able to find them.
    3
  39. Yep, Sibrel tells his 007 story and people fall for it. They don't even think about all the holes in it, the ridiculous improbabilities, and the lack of support he offers.
    3
  40. The flag was moving as the astronauts tried to screw the flagpole into the surface. No experts on the Van Allen Belts, including James Van Allen, claim that they would have stopped Apollo.
    3
  41. So what evidence convinced you the 6 landings didn't happen?
    3
  42. The authors of those books lied to you.
    3
  43. The only thing on your list that is primarily an American achievement is the moon landings: The British, and other Europen countries, had democracy before America, the British and others outlawed slavery long before America, the middle class developed globally, defeating the Nazis was a global effort with the British Empire and Soviet Union contributing, in many respects, more than America, and communism fell over under the weight of its own economic incompetence.
    3
  44. If you're genuine about research, there's Dave McKeegan, and Humans of Earth, both on YouTube.
    3
  45. Sibrel's claims have proven to be false. For example, the footage of Earth while in transit to the moon that he claims was secret, was taken originally from 2 TV broadcasts viewed by millions, the first 15 minutes long, the second 35 minutes long. It's Sibrel who edits to create a false narrative.
    3
  46. Surveys suggest it's the young who're the more skeptical of the moon landings.
    3
  47. Misinfo
    3
  48. He's blind to the masses of evidence that contradict his beliefs, so blind that, even though he's aware of evidence that makes his beliefs about the moon landings impossible, he won't give them up.
    3
  49. So, wrong all your life so far. You now have the chance to change that.
    3
  50. People familiar with the Apollo program have offered to debate Sibrel. Sibrel has declined to debate with anyone knowledgeable about the moon landings.
    3