Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. Why don't you Google it? SMH.
    2
  2. @seanmcnamara9326  there is no wind because there is no atmosphere, without an atmosphere parachutes don't parachute.
    2
  3. The lunar rocks have never been exposed to the environment on Earth, they're not contaminated by water and oxygen. The thousands of scientists doing microscopic examination of the samples would quickly realize they'd been contaminated if, for example, they'd been collected from somewhere like Antarctica.
    2
  4. Sheep follow without question. You don't question the narrative you've bought into.
    2
  5. You should watch the whole video, rather than the edited version, he was saying he didn't know why we haven't gone back to the moon.
    2
  6. ​ @paulbeardsley4095 looks like my comment is only visible in newest, so they may not be seeing it.
    2
  7. ​ @theeraphatsunthornwit6266 there are plenty of satellite services, including GPS, that are still available with no loss of quality a thousand miles from land.
    2
  8. Well, that explains why so many commenters have been misspelling his name.
    2
  9. Sibrel is a great storyteller, he throws in so much of his imagination. Before buying his offerings as fact, check out videos that debunk his claims.
    2
  10. "Get the CIA to wack him" was a sarcastic comment made after they'd finally ejected the aggressive intruder who'd accused them of committing various crimes in collusion with the CIA.
    2
  11. Sibrel is a grifter, he recently stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims. That includes Tim Dodd, who recently put up a 2 hour 20 minute video shredding Sibrel's various pieces of bs.
    2
  12.  @paulabevan  have you seen the full conference yet?
    2
  13. There was a mockumentary 'Shooting Stanley Kubrick' that starred Tom Mayk, written and directed by T Patrick Murray. It was a fictional account in which Kubrick (Mayk) confessed to producing the moon landing fakery. A lot of people were fooled, and the claim it was genuine evidence of a conspiracy has been much repeated.
    2
  14. Sibrel has stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims. Nothing he says isn't easily refuted by people who know the science and engineering involved in the Apollo missions.
    2
  15. The velocity change required to go from low earth orbit to the elliptical orbit to reach the moon is 3000m/s At one g of acceleration, the spacecraft would make that velocity change in 300 seconds, i.e., 5 minutes.
    2
  16.  @tylerd7330  they traveled North to South in the Atlantic, from Europe to Cape Horn and the Cape of Good Hope. Some traveled South to North in the Pacific, and then back South. What particular route are you looking for? In the '80's there were yacht races that circumnavigated Antarctica. Today tens of thousands of vessels, from huge passenger and cargo ships to small yachts circumnavigate the globe, and the world has to be a globe for them to get where they're going in the times and distances they expect.
    2
  17. I wish you were right, but Candace is smitten with the moon landing conspiracy theory, and Sibrel is the high priest.
    2
  18. Only the US has landed men on the moon, several countries have landed unmanned probes, several have had lunar orbiters.
    2
  19. No, you cannot see the 6 landing sites from the Earth, even the Hubble can't. There are however recent photos from probes orbiting the moon.
    2
  20. @AlexandersLostTomb 9 trips, 6 landings.   I'm not interested in seeing people spreading easily disproven nonsense. From either side of the debate.
    2
  21. It's not to late, you can learn all about Sibrel's lies from Dave McKeegan. The Challenger disaster was a result of O-ring failure on one of the SRB's, due to the O-rings being below their designed operating temperature after a freezing cold night before launch.
    2
  22. @artsonigaming  you mean going against all the evidence. In your eyes, very brave, I'm sure.
    2
  23. The cost of a ticket to Challenger Deep is reputed to be $750,000. The cost of a ticket to orbit the moon is at least 200 times as much, the cost of a ticket to land on the moon would have to be $500,000,000, and 10 years ago, it would have been 10x as much.
    2
  24. Won't happen. Sibrel has said that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    2
  25. No, only lunar orbiters are able to see material left at the landing sites
    2
  26.  @BALD75  yes in terms of harm to people the Van Allen Belts are a solved issue, in terms of causing problems for microelectronics, not so much.
    2
  27. ​ @ΑλλόφρωνΚαρχαρίαςΜπαταρίας none of Sibrel's claims stand up to proper scrutiny, which is why Sibrel never allows serious questioning of himself and his fantasies. Only lightweights on the topic like Owens and Rogan.
    2
  28. The Russian's know the moon landings happened. They congratulated the US on the achievement.
    2
  29.  @whooked  what you said is that you think evidence is irrelevant.
    2
  30. There are none of Sibrel's claims that aren't easily refuted, which is why Sibrel never does interviews with people who have the knowledge to point out his falsehoods.
    2
  31. Sibrel claims that was done from low earth orbit, with, as you say, only a tiny portion of the Earth visible through a window. That's false. If it were done that way, the clouds would have been moving quickly across the visible disc as the spacecraft orbited earth at the low earth orbit speed of 8km per second.
    2
  32. @citizeng7959  Sibrel does not claim they used a "transparency of the Earth" backlit by the Earth, his claim is as I described: that the camera was positioned across the width of the spacecraft while the spacecraft was in low earth orbit, with part of a round window blocked by a cresent infill, so that only a small portion of the Earth could be seen.
    2
  33. @citizeng7959  I based my description on Sibrel's movie A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Moon. At the 36 minute mark in the movie he offers his original version, which is as I described. The camera was across from the window with only a small portion of the Earth visible. There was no mention of any transparency. He now has a new version, introducing the transparency to his story.
    2
  34. @citizeng7959  the strongest evidence of the landings Sibrel will never mention: photos of the hardware at the landing sites taken by Indian and South Korean spacecraft. Chinese and Japanese spacecraft have also verified the existence of the landings, China has claimed verification but has not released the details, the Japanese spacecraft cameras didn't have the resolution to see hardware, but were able to reproduce images of the terrain around the sites using 3D mapping that match photos taken by the Apollo astronauts on the surface.
    2
  35. Concrete evidence? From Sibrel? I see nothing but bs from him. What "evidence"?
    2
  36. He did get punched in the face by Buzz - and it was glorious!
    2
  37. Aldrin does not tell people we didn't walk on the moon, I know nothing of this Alderon person you mention.
    2
  38. Is this where people are supposed to nod slowly in agreement with your deep wisdom?
    2
  39. Musk knows we went to the moon, You're projecting your fantasy conspiracy onto him.
    2
  40. Rather than just believe Sibrel, why not look at the many debunkings that have been done of his claims?
    2
  41. ​@ChadJohnson-pu4fu you probably mean operation starfish. Every year tens of thousands of voyages are made across the oceans of this globe, by vessels from oceanliners to small yachts. They all navigate on the basis of the world being a globe, and the travel distances and the time taken are as they expect with their globe navigation.
    2
  42. It's also a good idea to examine claims from people like Sibrel so as not to be taken in by their grift.
    2
  43. @davidfrankenfurter5800  why do you just repeat the claims of people like Sibrel, never checking to see if they've been less than honest with their claims?
    2
  44. Dave McKeegan refutes Sibrels claims. The footage in transit to the moon was taken originally from live network broadcasts, those broadcasts are available on YouTube and refute Sibrel's edited claims. No, we didn't have superior technology in the 60's, no one has gone beyond LEO since because no one has put the effort into going beyond LEO. The Apollo 11 astronauts were a little slow to relax at the first press conference after their 2 weeks in quarantine, but if you look at the entire press conference, rather than edits done to give a negative impression, you see they were relaxed and accurate in their description of their experience.
    2
  45. There is no evidence of death bed confessions. Sibrel's claims of being kidnapped by the CIA are ridiculous. The claimed operation "slamdunk" is named after a term that wasn't created until years after the supposed operation "slamdunk". Anyone can go outside into the morning or evening sun and create the appearance of nonparallel shadows, uneven ground and overhang, objects not precisely vertical, will all create shadows that appear to go in nonparellel directions. Stand with your back to the Sun between 2 objects, and the 3 shadows will appear to converge.
    2
  46. ​@lostman1ful there is no evidence offered by Sibrel that hasn't been refuted.
    2
  47. Yeah, it's hard not to see Sibrel's claims as other than lying. He has persisted in making factually false claims after the falsehood has been pointed out to him. Also he has stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims. So I find it difficult to give him the benefit of the doubt, especially when he so casually accuses others of lying.
    2
  48. ​@kasairb8563 we have the technology, we just don't have the vehicles at this time.
    2
  49. What a sad little universe you flat earthers live in. Most of us live in a vast and glorious universe.
    2
  50. They didn't fake video. The footage from the transit to the moon is part of 2 TV broadcasts totaling 40 minutes. Shots in the footage Sibrel doesn't show proves it genuine.
    2