Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. Stop embarrassing your wife.
    4
  2. Check Dave McKeegan's video on Sibrel's claims.
    4
  3. Perhaps you should watch the longer version of his discussion with Zoey, then you'll see how the conspiracy theorists have edited it to alter his meaning. He was replying to her question, "Why haven't we gone BACK" since Apollo.
    4
  4.  @backinmyrightmind  no scientist who has studied the Van Allen Belts has claimed that they're impassable.
    4
  5. ​ @backinmyrightmind just stating facts, sorry you find them upsetting.
    4
  6. A faith-based, not evidence-based, claim.
    3
  7. There is no one who has studied the Van Allen Belts who claims they were impassable for the Apollo astronauts.
    3
  8. ​ @Fi-tt7yq you're entitled to believe what ever you want: Santa, pixies at the end of the garden, whatever floats your boat.
    3
  9. Except that those that discovered and mapped the Van Allen Belts say Apollo could and did go past them.
    3
  10.  @helsbels2582  it didn't keep going because each apollo flight cost a fortune and the American people lost interest and weren't willing to keep throwing money at it.
    3
  11.  @helsbels2582  perhaps you are unaware that the landings have been confirmed with photos of the landing sites in recent years by lunar orbiters from China, India, Japan and South Korea.
    3
  12. @helsbels2582  Nasa's budget peaked at over 4% of the federal budget in the mid 60's, by 1974 it was down to 1%, not enough to continue with Apollo.
    3
  13. I've known a couple of compulsive liars, they're always absolute in the certainty of their stories, they're fast talkers, with a lot of distortions that people will let go as hyperbole. Sibrel reminds me strongly of those people.
    3
  14. They can't go now because they haven't, in recent years, built any spacecraft to go. They haven't built them because the government hasn't budgeted the money to build them. The government has budgeted the money the build them because there's no strong public desire to spend money on a return to the moon.
    3
  15. The claims you make about the Van Allen Belts is complete fiction. There isn't a single person who's studied the Van Allen Belts who says that they were impassable for the Apollo astronauts.
    3
  16. ​@TheAdventuresOfAce the Soviets didn't land a man on the moon because their N1 moon rocket kept exploding on the launch pad.
    3
  17. Why does air pressure decline with increasing altitude?
    3
  18. These are the molecular masses of the main components of the atmosphere (excluding H2O): CO2 44 Argon 40 Oxygen 32 Nitrogen 28 Air pressure at 10,000 metres (about the height airliners fly at) is a quarter of the air pressure at ground level. How could we get such a difference in air pressure from the separation of the gases in the atmosphere? If such a separation did happen, people at sea level would be smothered in CO2 and argon, and airliners at 10,000m would be smothered with nitrogen.
    3
  19. It was a flight of fantasy.
    3
  20. He's only credible for people who take his claims at face value. Dig into the details, for example photos of the landing sites taken by space probes from other countries, and you find the credibility he has is that of a conman.
    3
  21. Sibrel has never allowed himself to be interviewed by anyone with the knowledge of science and the Apollo program to seriously challenge his claims.
    3
  22. @Lostartsradio  I've looked at your second interview with Sibrel. You do not know where his falsehoods are obvious. Did you ask him about the photos of the Apollo landing sites taken from Lunar orbiting spacecraft from China, India and South Korea? Did you ask him for an expert on the Van Allen Belts who's claimed that they were impassable for the Apollo astronauts? Did you ask him why he offers material from 2 tv broadcasts during the transit to the moon and ask him why he claims the snippets he shows were secret - when they've been in the public domain for 55 years?
    3
  23.  @Lostartsradio  did you ask him why there should be a 4 second delay (referring to the supposed CIA voice) when the spacecraft was only 95,000km from Earth, when the round trip radio delay is only 0.65 seconds, an obvious reality when you listen to the 15 minute TV transmission in which that word "talk"(?) is included?
    3
  24. ​@Lostartsradio did you ask him why he was claiming video he "released" was secret, when in fact that video had been in the public domain for since July 1969 - after being broadcast live?
    3
  25. ​ @Lostartsradio have you ever looked at the many videos that critique the conspiracy theorists claims?
    3
  26. All of Sibrel's claims about the moon landings have been completely refuted. To make some of his claims, Sibrel has to have knowingly lied.
    3
  27. @dfkuz  the net of enchantment is the one spun by Sibrel.
    3
  28.  @dfkuz  you've been enchanted by Sibrel's fantasy.
    3
  29. @dfkuz  you must think the government amazingly clever to keep the deception going for 60 years.
    3
  30. @dfkuz  I've never thought the government so clever. You must be in awe of it.
    3
  31. @dfkuz  "whacked" Sarcasm, after ejecting him after hearing his accusations of being involved in a huge CIA conspiracy, I'd likely make a similar comment.
    3
  32.  @dfkuz  "whacked" sarcasm.
    3
  33. @dfkuz  you're seeing what you want to see. The deniers want it both ways. Actors that can't act, but did an amazing acting job to fool the world.
    3
  34. And sibrel obliges
    3
  35. How about Antarctica? There were decades between the first successful expeditions and the following expeditions. There are still no permanent residents of Antarctica.
    3
  36. Sibrel has stated that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims. All his claims are easily refuted by people who know the science and engineering involved in the Apollo missions.
    3
  37. You don't know what you're talking about, the foil was just the thermal insulation over the descent stage structure, there's no evidence of multiple light sources. Stanley Kubrick did not make the statement you claim. You've been misled by grifters like Sibrel.
    3
  38.  @briantitchener4829  "millions like me" Of course not, but your idea of "research" is to go looking on the internet for stuff that confirms your preexisting beliefs and biases. When other people use the term "research", they mean actually running the experiments, and doing the required math, themselves.
    3
  39.  @briantitchener4829  none of what you see as anomalies withstand real scrutiny. Not one. They're manufactured to support grift.
    3
  40. Sibrel is a grifter with no credibility.
    3
  41.  @chiwaled  you know less than him.
    3
  42. Sibrel has never been interviewed by anyone familiar with the technology and science of Apollo. He recently said that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    3
  43. Musk has done a lot in a short time. He hasn't had time to start colonies on Mars or the Moon.
    3
  44. Very strange, the astronauts all had solid tertiary qualifications, mostly in engineering, they were all test pilots or combat pilots. I was always impressed by them as people who were cool and good at "things", though not necessarily good at people. I think perhaps you just look for different measures of intelligence than me. Perhaps you see intelligence in the ability to talk big, in which case you must think Sibrel an absolute genius.
    3
  45. Science produced all the technology around you that's beyond your comprehension and the wealth that keeps you in comfort.
    3
  46. To fake the Apollo program still required building all the hardware and launching that hardware, as it was tracked to the moon it had to have gone to the moon.
    3
  47. You probably should look at videos debunking Sibrel's claims before buying his claims. Sibrel recently said that he will not debate anyone with the knowledge to challenge his claims.
    3
  48. @mellie5899  don't be sucked in by Sibrel. He's a shyster.
    3
  49. @Achris7703  I've watched all the claims from Sibrel, Kaysing and others. Their claims are easily refuted. Have you done your research? Have you watched Dave McKeegan's video on the topic? Tim Dodd's?
    3
  50. You obviously mean powerfool.
    3