Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Candace Owens" channel.

  1. He's in it for the money, a grifter.
    3
  2. How far away are the sun and the moon?
    3
  3. Why is there a pressure gradient in the atmosphere?
    3
  4. Great! But you really need to back that up with details. Otherwise, people will just think you're a blowhard.
    3
  5. The longer version makes it even more clear that he was answering her question as to why we haven't been back since Apollo.
    3
  6. ​ @aleanafox9905 his reply taken as evidence that he admitted not going, was his reply to her question "why haven't we gone BACK".
    3
  7. You probably should look at videos debunking Sibrel's claims. I suggest Dave McKeegan or Tim Dodd's
    3
  8. Elon knows that men landed on the moon.
    3
  9. YouTube channel 'Humans of Earth'
    3
  10. ​ @AyloynOwlFeather presumably part 3. Got a time on that video for your discovery?
    3
  11. @AyloynOwlFeather  have you got the time on that video of your discovery?
    3
  12. ​@SolarChronicle I saw it was missing and found a link back to it from another site. Video had been "taken down due to a copyright claim by Warner" Corp.
    3
  13. As you have been bamboozled by Sibrel and his stories.
    3
  14. I've not seen any claims of the same hills in the background at different landing sites. Because the hills appear so close, due to no atmospheric haze, often they look the same from locations widely scattered around one landing site. No one who has studied the Van Allen Belts say that they were impassable for the Apollo astronauts. The footage from halfway to the moon is from 2 TV broadcasts, on day 1 and day 2 of the mission. That full unedited footage, totaling 50 minutes, reveals Sibrel's claims to be false.
    3
  15. ​​ @aaronbarlow4376 all your claims are false. If you insist that exactly the same hills are in photos from two sites, provide those photos category numbers. Name an expert on the Van Allen Belts who claims that they were impassable. The video I refer to is available both on YouTube and at Nasa's apollo site. You haven't even looked at it.
    3
  16. What delta v is required to go from Earth's surface to LEO? What delta v is required to go from LEO to Earth escape velocity? See, the answers are obvious!
    3
  17. Yep, and there are a lot of people who've looked at Sibrel's claims and found falsehoods throughout.
    3
  18. And some people would even expect you to believe in airliners, with hundreds of ordinary people on board, flying at altitudes even higher than the top of Everest.
    3
  19. Watch the whole 17;22 long interview with Zoey, he was addressing her question "why haven't we gone BACK?"
    3
  20. Yep, the main evidence against the window bs is that if the spacecraft were in low earth orbit with only a small part of the Earth being shown, the clouds visible would be shifting out of frame continuously as the spacecraft passed over them at the orbital speed of 5 miles a second. What is actually seen is the same cloud patterns barely shifting over the several minutes of the video. Sibrel has never addressed this, or other proofs, against his fairy tale.
    3
  21. Sibrel lies through his teeth. A snake oil salesman.
    3
  22. The Soviet Union congratulated the US for the successful moon landings.
    3
  23. Anyone can duplicate Sibrel's favorite shadows and rocks moon photo in their backyard on a sunny morning, and discover his claims that it requires multiple light sources is false.
    3
  24. Sibrel doesn't mention the evidence that refutes his claims. For example, lunar orbiters from China, India, Japan and South Korea have confirmed the existence of the landing sites.
    3
  25. Sibrel insults everyone who disagrees with his claims.
    3
  26. Sadly, you're obviously no brighter now than you were then.
    3
  27. The discussion with Zoe is not as you describe. The snippet that is used to misrepresent Aldrin is from a longer discussion in which he talks to her about his experience of going to the moon. Near the end she asks him why we haven't gone back, and he replies he doesn't know why we haven't gone [back]. Conspiracy theorists, like Bart, are short on honesty.
    3
  28. @denisemcdonald2729  I tried to link, looks like my comment is hidden: Zoey interviews Buzz Aldrin [17;22 minutes long on YouTube]
    3
  29. Yeah, while avoiding proper scrutiny of his claims, Sibrel gets in as many interviews as he can, repeating the same lies over and over again.
    3
  30. ​ @DanFreeman723 yeah, Sibrel counts on that.
    3
  31. ​ @DanFreeman723 yeah, so far Sibrel has only attracted the easily fuuled.
    3
  32. The landings happened, the existence of the 6 lunar landing sites has been confirmed by lunar orbiters from China, India, Japan and South Korea. The Soviet Union and private radio operators tracked the spacecraft to the moon and back.
    3
  33. The Apollo landing sites have been confirmed by lunar orbiters from several countries.
    3
  34. He spins a good yarn
    3
  35.  @Timepiece80  I'm sorry you're hurt
    3
  36. ​ @garyolsen4160 you've listed a load of things without specifying what about them are, in your mind, lies. Yes there was a war in Vietnam, yes, several of those people were assassinated.
    3
  37. ​ @garyolsen4160 the Challenger disaster was a result of a failure of an O ring in one of the SRBs.
    3
  38. ​ @garyolsen4160 there is indeed a country called Afghanistan, there's also a country called Vietnam.
    3
  39. ​​ @garyolsen4160 9/11 was carried out by Al Qaeda.
    3
  40. @garyolsen4160  the astronauts were on board and there's zero evidence to contradict that.
    3
  41.  @garyolsen4160  the WMDs claim to justify the second war against Sadam was false. But more a case of confirmation bias. They were certain that he had them, despite a lack of evidence.
    3
  42. What things don't make sense? Apart from the Soviets and more recently the Chinese, Indians, Japanese and South Koreans confirmation of the moon landings, the later four through observations of the landing sites with spacecraft orbiting the moon in recent years.
    3
  43. You should look into who founded Nasa.
    3
  44.  @Alisonwarr87  it was founded by the Eisenhower Administration.
    3
  45. People rarely challenge Sibrel in interviews, as he avoids such interviews. On the rare occasions he is challenged, he gets very annoyed. Aldrin punched Sibrel when Sibrel called him "a liar, a thief and a coward."
    3
  46. @madcarver4492  facts, do you imagine large rockets rising into the sky, with thousands watching, are holograms? Do you think starlink isn't real?
    3
  47. Photos of the landing sites have been taken by lunar orbiters from China, India, and South Korea in recent years, along with Nasa's LRO. The moon is too far from Earth to see objects as small as 4 metres across, even with the largest telescopes.
    3
  48. The footage is not fake, it may look strange to you, but that's due to it being shot in an environment you've not experienced.
    3
  49. Elon knows we landed on the moon, as does anyone who's looked at the evidence in detail, rather than just swallow a fraudsters claims without question.
    3
  50. On what evidence do you base that claim?
    3