Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Spark" channel.

  1. ​@RichardWallace-t6u there's no evidence of the flag blowing, it was held out by a spar through the top, it was only moving when the astronauts were touching it.
    3
  2. Nasa has thousands of photos on line, you can't find any that support the claim of the same background at different landing sites.
    2
  3. And yet you're unable to offer any evidence to support your beliefs.
    2
  4. @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  I have checked the claim out. The claim that Aldrin said they didn't go to the moon is a lie.
    2
  5. @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  the full 17 minute interview with Zoey reveals how Aldrin's comments have been cut to change their meaning. And I know of two other occasions on which Aldrin's comments have been misrepresented.
    2
  6. ​​ @apocalips8008 Kubrick was busy making 2001: A Space Odyssey at the time, so Nasa had to resort to landing men on the moon. Edit: Your comment sarcasm I think.
    2
  7. @kev596  so you want me to tell you, but won't accept the factual answer? Well, I'll try anyway, though it's probably too complex for you. The Apollo lunar module descent stage was about 4 meters across. The moon is about 380,000,000 meters away, so a ratio of about 1:100,000,000 So using that ratio we can say that the descent stage has about the same angular size as a 1mm flea at a distance of 100,000,000 millimeters ie. 100 km. You show me a telescope that can resolve a flea at that distance, or the head of a 4mm screw on the ISS from 400km, and I'll show you a telescope that can resolve the LM descent stage from Earth.
    2
  8. Excellent! You should show everyone the evidence you have.
    2
  9. ​ @vacuumandgaspressurecoexisting the cameras were modified to hold rolls with 160 color or 200 black and white frames.
    2
  10. Yet there is plenty of evidence that they went, zero evidence that it was faked.
    2
  11.  @relaxdreammeditate6901  and you're unable to say what "lies and deception" because there aren't any, other than those from people like Sibrel.
    2
  12. "Cannot provide any evidence" There's hundreds of hours of video, thousands of photos, there's the evidence of thousands who monitored and tracked the 9 missions that went to the moon. There's all the engineering that went into Apollo, there are photos from Lunar orbit of the landing sites taken from the spacecraft of 5 nations. There's the fact other countries also tracked the Apollo missions. "No evidence "??
    2
  13. There's also 380kg of moon rocks that have been authenticated by thousandsof scientists. If all that doesn't constitute evidence, what would?
    2
  14. ​@EAZYDOESIT why do you think insults and hubris makes a good argument?
    2
  15. ​ @EAZYDOESIT I've noticed this with a lot of those who think they're rebels, their principle argument is devoid of any reasoning or basic knowledge. Are you a flat Earther as well?
    2
  16. @EAZYDOESIT  you're obviously about 12.
    2
  17. @EAZYDOESIT  your knowledge of Apollo is very shallow, you demonstrate that you've bought falsehoods without questioning them, so you're the foolish sheep. You only know a few lies about Apollo, I know details that are beyond your comprehension as a 12 year old.
    2
  18.  @daryllect6659  you're a sheep to the conspiracy theorists.
    2
  19.  @daryllect6659  name any piece of evidence that you've bought and I'll explain why it's false.
    2
  20. That people are silly enough to buy the stories of grifters like Sibrel is a testament to human gullability.
    2
  21. They discussed his experiences with Armstrong and Collins going to the moon. Then she asked him why no one had gone since. The grifters take his reply to that out of that context.
    2
  22. Every one of the claims of the conspiracy theory grifters has been refuted.
    2
  23. @walterplessen1883  if a full earth was photographed by Apollo 17, it would have been early in-transit near the Earth.
    2
  24. @walterplessen1883  there's an umbilical bridge that connects the electronics and power from the command module to the service module. The service module provides the thrust to enter and depart lunar orbit.
    2
  25. If only those claiming it was a hoax actually had evidence to support their beliefs.
    2
  26.  @jack_276  trying your channel
    2
  27. ​@apocalips8008 Sorry, Kubrick was too busy at the time, so Nasa had to use all the investments it had made in terms of training, infrastructure and hardware and actually land some men on the moon.
    2
  28. You have no data to support that claim.
    1
  29. The math for spaceflight maneuvers like using the Oberth Effect and Hohmann transfer orbits was first done in the 1920's.
    1
  30. @Luke.Skywodka  all the blueprints of all components of the Saturn V and Apollo spacecraft are stored on microfilm. At the Johnson Space Center there is an entire, flight certified, Saturn V/Apollo launch stack on display. There are still several examples of all the components of the Apollo spacecraft on display at various museums and Nasa facilities.
    1
  31. @Luke.Skywodka  you've swallowed the grifters propaganda, which gets more and more fanciful with each telling.
    1
  32. And you can offer no evidence that the moon landings didn't happen. You fell for the stories of charlatans and grifters.
    1
  33. And you've never had a shred of evidence to support your claim.
    1
  34. How do you know it's a fact? What actual evidence do you offer to support your conclusion?
    1
  35. By your logic the Concorde, the X15 and the SR71 were all fake.
    1
  36. @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  your claim is a lie.
    1
  37. @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  yeah, you have to read between the lines, and quote mine, to patch together the narrative you want to believe.
    1
  38.  @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  I've no trusting the US government. I look more to the substantial third-party evidence that confirms the moon landings.
    1
  39.  @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  I have no faith in the US government.
    1
  40.  @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  I look at third-party evidence not US government evidence.
    1
  41. @LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK  the evidence that's worth looking at is from third parties.
    1
  42. ​@vrado441 your claim has no supporting evidence.
    1
  43. There isn't a single person who has studied the Van Allen Belts who says that they were impassable for the Apollo astronauts.
    1
  44. @vacuumandgaspressurecoexisting  yes, the Van Allen Belts are of extremely low density (the total mass of the belts is about 0.2grams spread through hundreds of millions of cubic kilometers) and have zero interactions with photons.
    1
  45. Distant galaxies are thousands of light years across, the descent stages of the landers are 4 metres across. In terms of angular size, as seen from Earth, the descent stages are the size of a 1mm flea seen from 100km.
    1
  46. What is the Van Halen belt? Does it hold up the trousers of the members of the rock group Van Halen?
    1
  47. Great, what evidence do you offer to support your claim?
    1
  48. If only you knew how dishonest the claims of those denying the moon landings are.
    1
  49. ​@kev596 "land on the side of the moon we can't see". In that one sentence you demonstrate your complete ignorance of the Apollo moon landings. How can you think you're qualified to even have an opinion?
    1
  50.  @kev596  ffs. All 6 landings were on the near side of the moon. That you thought otherwise demonstrates your complete lack of knowledge on the topic.
    1