Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Sydney Watson" channel.

  1.  Global Man  you're as much a bigot as those feminists.
    10
  2.  Global Man  I see the problem, you're a fuck-up that no one can stand, men or women. go get the help you need.
    10
  3. Typically shallow Australian TV.
    7
  4.  Global Man  are you just a troll? Are you suggesting that Sydney hates men, that Sydney condones women's perjury in divorce courts to ruin men's lives and drive many men to suicide etc, etc? Or are you claiming Sydney isn't a woman? She looks like a woman to me :-) Do you apply those same claims about "all women" to Janice Fiamengo and Bettina Arndt as well? Or do you think they aren't women either?
    4
  5. The main thing is for the portrayal to be convincing, the entertainment entertaining (in a good way). A black James Bond for me not a problem, a James Bond with the wrong accent would be a problem, a female James Bond . . . What the F . . .!
    1
  6. Big hugs
    1
  7. The whole madness is a campaign by the cisphobic.
    1
  8. I haven't seen the movie. I was surprised that your take is so different to that of Aba & Preach, who saw a lot of depth that you appear to have missed, they see it as depicting the problems of reality, definitely not glorifying these problems. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psJwJRpJMes
    1
  9. Well, given the difference in opinion between Sydney and Aba & Preach, I thought I'd watch the movie. I agree with Aba & Preach. In the context of the story: Centered around an 11 year old girl and her peers growing into THAT stage of their lives, trying to be older than they are - something hardly unusual with girls of that age, I thought the scenes in the movie were in context. Sydney may never have gone through that pre-teen phase, but many do. The security Guard was certainly intended to be an unattractive pedo - so his eyeing up of the girls was not being viewed approvingly. In the final dance scene the over-the-top sexualization of the girls dance was seen as distasteful by many of those viewing in the dance audience, and it was obviously the intent for that distaste to be shared by those in the films audience. At the very end it's clear that the main character realized she'd been wrong trying to grow up too soon, in large part a form of rebellion against her family life, and we're left with the impression she'd leaned to be herself at her age. Is this film exceptional in it's scenes of sexualization of underage girls? I'd compare it to Olivia Hussey at 15 in 1968's Romeo & Juliet and Brooke Shields at 14 in The Blue Lagoon, both of which were shown to my classes in 8th and 9th grade. In both of those movies the levels of nudity on display were considerably greater than in Cuties (Cuties being the name of the girls dance group). So, all said and done, I think this film has been a target of leftist thought police efforts at censorship because, hey, us average people are not able to make these calls for ourselves, only the thought police know what we should be allowed to watch, we're apparently not capable of seeing any context and the true message, apparently because we're all shallow pedos.
    1
  10. When you start building your belief system on identity politics - whether it's sexism, racism or religious hatred, you're already a bigot - as those panelists demonstrate.
    1
  11. "For U.S. full-time workers, a 20 cents pay gap comes out to about $10,000 a year". Well I guess that makes sense - if full-time work mean 50,000 hours a year - which means working 136 hours a day every day of the year . . . Perhaps they mean a 20 percent pay gap, but whats the diff, 20 cents causing a pay gap of $10,000 sounds far more unjust.
    1
  12. Just watched the MSM coverage of the New Zealand convoy after arriving in Wellington, the story offered was completely biased, concentrating on the fringe elements that had joined the protest rather than on the central message that the organisers were trying to convey. So as far as the MSM was concerned; a bunch of abusive and violent extremists who represented no one and didn't even know what they were protesting about.
    1
  13. As you illustrate, many on the right reach conclusions about the science based on whether or not the proposed solutions fit with their ideological preferences (probably, in many instances, the same can be said of the left). But logically that's just nuts, the natural laws that govern the physical world aren't going to bend to peoples ideological preferences, peoples views on the science should not be determined by their political or economic ideology (though if it's a religious thing I suppose faith means you can put aside logic all together).
    1