Comments by "andrew worth" (@andrewworth7574) on "Biden's big statement on attacking Russia with U.S. F-16s; 'Zelensky flatly assured me...' | Watch" video.

Russia should take its army home and end the war.
5
If Russia wants to be left alone it should keep its army at home.
3
F16 with HARM missiles will see S300, S400 gone.
3
Those systems did their job, now there're no more Russian tanks left for javelin, no more Russian bases for himars, no more kinzhal for patriot, soon no more migs and Su for F16.
3
About time they had a training day. In other airforces they train every day. That lack of training is why the Russian airforce hides in Russia.
2
 @izevbizuatrustine611 what no one told you is that Russia invaded Ukraine killing tens of thousands of civilians, shelling cities to rubble. Try to pay attention.
2
 @viacheslav1 "20 states" So you think the US invading other countries is a good idea so it's a good idea for Russia to invade other countries??
2
@henryseidel5469 it's very difficult under the first past the post (FPP) electoral system for third parties to break through, most voters will see a vote for a third party as a wasted vote, which it usually is. Under electoral systems of proportional representation voters will see their vote counting as candidates with even a small minority of the vote getting into the parliament/house, so voters are not nearly as discouraged from voting for smaller parties. One system I'm familiar with is the mixed member proportional system (MMP) a version of which Ukraine uses, under that system each voters gets a electorate vote and a party vote, with candidates on the party roll distributed to make the representation in the parliament proportional to the party vote. Under that system, if the electorate vote in itself is FPP it's still often a 2 horse race, and it's the party vote that brings the representation of smaller parties into parliament. I prefer proportional systems, though if taken to the extreme they can end up with instability with a situation where no single party or coalition of parties has the power to form a stable government. (Israel springs to mind)
2
 @calabuzkal8080 you still believe Russian propaganda that kinzhal is more than over hyped junk?? 😂😂😂😂😂
2
Putin cannot be trusted at all, lying is his trademark.
1
We now know that Russia is not a serious military, it has a corrupt mess for a military.
1
Putin lies everyday.
1
@henryseidel5469 and the separatist were using Russian supplied artillery to kill ethnic Ukrainians. But that was in 2014 and 2015. For the 3 years prior to the Russian invasion each year less than 10 civilians were killed on both from shelling. Putin's war increased the civilian death toll a thousand fold over those recent years.
1
@niburu1508 everything I say is supported by UN reports.
1
@ashton1952 what sources do you recommend?
1
@Marthy Williams Williams Ukraine is home to the people who live there, Ukrainians.
1
@henryseidel5469 contrary to Russian propaganda there's been very little conflict in the Donbas for years. And the soldiers in the Russian army aren't from the Donbas, they're from Russia.
1
@shomadea unlike the Russian army in Ukraine the US armed forces were invited by the sovereign government of those countries and its presence is popular with the local citizens. I guess the difference is lost on some people despite the obvious difference that Ukrainians are fighting to expel Russian troops while South Koreans, the Japanese and Germans are not fighting to kick out the Americans.
1
@dannyb4753 you shouldn't watch so much Russian propaganda. US weapons are two levels above Russian junk, it's why T72 tanks kept tossing their turrets when hit by javelin, it's why the Russian airforce stays inside Russia, it's why Russian soldiers wish they'd stayed inside Russia (also because of the brave Ukrainians fighting to defeat the invaders).
1
 @viacheslav1 Napoleon and Hitler invaded Russia, this time it was Russia doing the invading. Putin is the Hitler this time.
1
 @bael6472 your Russian friend would be safe if he didn't invade another country.
1
 @henryseidel5469 yep, Russia is successful when it fights against invaders, not when it is the invader.
1
 @viacheslav1 actually Russia was made by Scandinavians.
1
 @aaronmncube414 there're obviously a lot of Russians who think Putin is God, it'll be due to all of Putin's propaganda.
1
 @viacheslav1 many years of life.
1
@henryseidel5469 you should go look at the policies of the political parties Ukrainians vote for. And do you know that Zelensky was elected in 2019, after beating petro Poroshenko. That there was very little conflict in the Donbas between him becoming Ukraine president and the Russian invasion? That in those 3 years less than 30 civilians were killed on both sides from shelling? Compare that to the tens of thousands of civilians killed by the Russian invasion.
1
@henryseidel5469 you are aware of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact?
1
@henryseidel5469 and Russia became a large country through conquering other countries, and Russia sold Alaska to the US, and Putin has written about the disintegration of the Soviet Union being the biggest disaster of the twentieth century (it freed other people from Russian oppression) and how he yearns for a new Russian empire.
1
@henryseidel5469 Texas was American in 1860, an indication that you don't worry too much about getting your facts right.
1
 @henryseidel5469 my numbers are good, check your own.
1
@henryseidel5469 Britain tried hard to negotiate a peace deal with Hitler, to stop his aggression. Britain learnt from that that you can't negotiate with terrorists and dictators who want to conquer their neighbors. And so we know that negotiations with Putin are a waste of time and effort.
1
@henryseidel5469 Stalin invaded Poland along with Hitler, as Putin invaded Ukraine, strange way to "keep the peace" but the dictators way - through oppression.
1
@henryseidel5469 interesting that you hold Stalin in such high regard, he's actually making a comeback in the eyes of many Russians as well, probably because Putin finds it useful.
1
@henryseidel5469 political leaders usually start of with good intentions but time and power almost alway corrupt them.
1
@henryseidel5469 are you joking? I don't think it's funny to suggest the Government have the power to disqualify opposition candidates that might pose a serious challenge to the governing party.
1
@henryseidel5469 what "proper qualifications" requirements does the US government impose on the selection of candidates. I confess I'm not sure what the US having a two party system has to do with candidate selection, though I could discuss the merits of the US primaries system vs other selection systems where party committees do the selection.
1
@SamsungS-or1qf every reason, it's called free speech, perhaps you prefer opinions other than your own were suppressed. Ain't happening.
1
@henryseidel5469 "proper qualification" Sorry, I was too flippant in my reply, one of the reasons I dislike the US primary system is that those doing the selecting (the mass of mental mediocrity commonly known as the electorate) aren't very professional in how they approach the task, like employing a plumber not on his professionalism but on his sales pitch. So I think electorate committees select better candidates than the US primaries system, I think committee members are more expert in sorting out the big mouth BSers.
1
They need to get some practice in at some stage, but they should start with targets that don't shoot back.
1
Russia has few friends, using nukes = no friends.
1
@dannyb4753 it's been confirmed that one launcher was damaged by falling debris and was quickly repaired has now been fixed. You really shouldn't trust Russian MOD propaganda.
1
@alifkazeryu8228 Wagner captured Bakhmut, they used little in the way of armor, it was mostly artillery and infantry. But I was obviously overstating for effect, Russia has only lost 3/4 of the tanks it started with.
1