Comments by "ViceCoin" (@ViceCoin) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. ​@RobertMarshall-d2nIt's over. NATO lost. The elites are not going to risk their precious heirs spending decades in nuclear fallout shelters over a poor, corrupt Eastern Europeans.
    1
  2. Only a few large surface warships in Russia and aircraft carriers in China to target.
    1
  3. @moetocafe  Many advanced US weapons, like F35, can't be maintained by high school-educated grunts, and require expensive private contractors.
    1
  4. Not effective in urban combat.
    1
  5. NATO wants the war to last hntil 2035, to catch up in weapons.
    1
  6. Drones can't recognize pack animals.😅
    1
  7. Europe is the main target for the Backfire.
    1
  8. Russian air defenses dominate. It's a war of drones and missiles, not dogfights. Patriots have more losses than kills.😅
    1
  9. What are the costs?
    1
  10. NATO Codename: Shovel. 😅
    1
  11. GPS can be jammed, spoofed.
    1
  12. 70ton tanks are not suited for urban and drone warfare in muddy terrain and river crossings. Most bridges in Europe cant support the weight of Abrams.
    1
  13. @Boringman1234  US leads the world in addicts. 70% of active duty vets are fat. US is last in literacy in the developed world. I didn't re-enlist due to too many hillbillies and rappers in the ranks.
    1
  14. @williamzk9083  Tanks are expendable. Only hillbilly Americans send $10million tanks into minefields, praying to white Jesus for protection. LOL
    1
  15. @ingemarsjoo4542  Obsolete, but beat the best NATO junk in Ukraine. LOL
    1
  16. Western arms are vulnerable to bad weather.
    1
  17. No threat for another 20 years of delays. Already obsolete.
    1
  18. Congrats! US Minuteman ICBM is 70 years old.
    1
  19. F35 is the new Phantom.
    1
  20. ​ @cikicar India and Pakistan have more poverty than Sub-Saharan Africa. Rafale costs $250million, 2X the cost of F35.
    1
  21. No nuclear warhead?
    1
  22. What is the min speed of Afghanit against drones?
    1