Comments by "Raptor White" (@raptorwhite6468) on "Curious Droid" channel.

  1. That's an interesting point you just made. Could you provide evidence for it? Have you calculated the ∆v of the craft? Or the amount of fuel based on the volume of the tanks? Maybe you calculated that the thrust of its engines is insufficient? Or that the walls couldn't withstand the pressure difference? Or that the landing legs couldn't withstand the force of the impact? Or that the engine design was flawed and they couldn't be ignited? Or that micrometeorite strikes were likely enough to be a concern? Or that the radiation levels were too high to survive? Or that the temperature control systems couldn't be able to handle the harsh lunar environment? Or that the antennas were not sufficient to ensure stable communication with Earth? Or that the batteries couldn't keep the craft working for 70 hours? Or that the air or water supplies were too low? Or that there was something wrong with the radar? Or the docking port? Or that the center of mass wasn't lined up with the engine? If so, I'd like to see your calculations to hopefully be able to continue a civilized and respectful discussion on the topic.
    13
  2. Yeah, sure... Except "A Space Odyssey", with all due respect, looked ridiculously unrealistic
    8
  3. ​ @therealrobinc  Just stating facts, recreating the Apollo footage on Earth would require a vacuum chamber with an area of at least 10 000 m²
    7
  4.  @abhroy  Two tiny answers: 1) There is a slight crater. The engine was really weak, only capable of blowing away the thin top layer of dust. 2) A camera. No one needs to hold a camera for it to record. According to your logic, who recorded all the footage from nuclear tests? Who is sitting 5 meters away from a rocket recording its launch? Are there 700 million people just holding all the cameras in China? Ever seen a footage of a crime from security cameras? Why doesn't the guy who's recording stop it? Are there people in Mars rovers recording? Are there some kind of tiny gnomes hidden in every drone to hold the camera?
    6
  5. Not really, the fact they did is pretty obvious
    5
  6.  @abhroy  "A big bulky film or tv camera" Westinghouse Apollo Lunar Television camera dimensions were 269 mm × 165 mm × 86 mm "Survived the landing shock" The Landers impacted the surface at around 2.5 m/s. Around as fast as one does after a jump. "flag waving" the flag was only waving while held by astronauts. That's called inertia. How early did you stop learning physics in school that you don't even know that? "Multiple shadows of astronauts" there never were multiple shadows. I could make up some stuff as proof too, but I prefer just using facts. "crossing the van allen radiation belt" alpha and beta radiation can be blocked by thin aluminum. Not to mention that Gemini XI spent more time in the Van Allen belts than all the Apollo missions combined. But the astronauts were unharmed. "no stars in the sky" really? This might be the most embarrassing point you guys make. At this point I don't think I really need to explain that, you definitely had this explained many times, but just choose to ignore it and remain delusional.
    5
  7. Do you have a slightest idea what van allen belts are?
    5
  8. This is really simple - if you put your hand in water that's for example 100°C hot, you will probably get a burn. If you put it in an oven where air is 100°C too, it won't be nearly as bad, because it's less dense, so not as much thermal energy is transferred. The temperatures you mentioned are in a near vacuum environment, so almost no energy can be transferred. A good example of that is a fusion reactor, where temperatures reach 150 million degrees Celsius, but they don't melt anything, because their in a near vacuum too
    5
  9. We did. It's simpler this way
    4
  10. ​ @American-Motors-Corporation  So now the whole cold war was fake? Just because it doesn't add up to your nonsense idea?
    4
  11. ​​ @alicesherson4894  These were just two missions out of 135 missions, so it's still not too bad. I don't mean it wasn't a tragedy, but the program itself was pretty good
    2
  12. They take great care of them, all of them are safe and available online
    2
  13. No, it's a launch pad they have no use for anymore
    2
  14. How many times it has to be repeated? If NASA had the budget from the 1960's we'd have been on Mars a long time ago
    2
  15. What Moon artifacts got lost? One bag with some dust in it?
    2
  16. ​ @mosesmanaka8109  It took them such a long time because it's how science works, they need proofs. The fact people like you were saying this doesn't prove you right, it's like saying all eggs in the world are rotten and claim you're right, because someone found a rotten egg. "We"? Are you 100 years old? And even if you were, nobody would call you a "conspiracy theorist" because this term was first used in 1945 and popularized in Late XX Century. Always when I see some people who don't like vaccines for whatever reason, it reminds me of the fact that similar idiots thought people would turn into cows after taking vaccines when they were first invented. And you asked for photos of Apollo landing site, just look up "apollo landing sites photos" you will easily find many of orbital photos, some taken by NASA, some by different space agencies.
    2
  17.  @mosesmanaka8109  No, I got vaccinated and I didn't get ill. Btw, covid vaccines are supposed to protect from serious illness, not from just getting ill
    2
  18. There also is a YouTube video about a guy stumbling across Star Wars ships in Germany, crazy right?
    2
  19. But they couldn't lie about that
    2
  20.  @SlackerU  What does the fact that stuff in your house is Chinese has to do with Moon landings?
    2
  21.  @SlackerU  They probably will, Artemis program already started
    2
  22. Not all, most are being build by machines and some are even 3d printed
    2
  23. Yeah, sure, but you still don't have a proof of that
    2
  24.  @georgejones3526  Apollo 11 footage wasn't really scientifically important, it was only supposed to be transmitted live all around the world, the more important footage was taken in later missions and remains untouched.
    1
  25. It's completely different than the pyramids, we can easily build a pyramid, but there's no reason to.
    1
  26.  @keltonfoster  If I remember correctly, most of the telemetry data from Apollo 11 was found in Australia and data from other Apollo missions never got lost
    1
  27. They stored the film in a special container
    1
  28. ​ @TheGecko213  No it wasn't
    1
  29. So why don't you make an F-1 yourself?
    1