Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Alec Baldwin's Rust manslaughter trial dismissed over alleged hidden evidence | BBC News" video.

  1. ⁠​⁠ @greenbeagle13 yup, the jury wasn’t present. I’ll be honest, when I heard that she testified at the hearing, I was hoping she’d jump to her feet to ask questions and sit back down to answer them, culminating in her yelling at herself, “You can’t handle the truth!”
    2
  2. The special prosecutor doesn’t dispute that the evidence was withheld or hidden. Indeed, she claims she didn’t know it was being concealed.
    1
  3. Worse than poorly prosecuted. The prosecutorial misconduct in the case is staggering. The hiding of evidence from the defense was just the worst of it, but it was party of a pattern of misconduct surrounding the discovery process. Indeed, if one credits the special prosecutor that she was unaware of the coverup, one could accuse her of “criminal negligence”, the same charge Baldwin was facing. 😂
    1
  4. Judges can decide what evidence is allowable. A prosecutor cannot decide on behalf of the defense what evidence is relevant. That’s the first basic principle that was violated. But the kicker is that the investigators working for the special prosecutor took action to hide the evidence. I’m not an expert but an educated layman. It seems to me that the investigators, including the crime scene technician, have opened themselves up to criminal charges of obstruction of justice and conspiracy to commit obstruction.
    1