Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Ukrainians destroyed a Russian landing ship with a missile" video.

@gulfmarine8857 Which is why he must tear the hair off of his subordinates. He believes it is their fault he is bald, and he suspects that NATO has placed that hair on their heads to threaten his head.
20
@kevinmulkey9774 I think the Soviet, I mean Russian, air defense weapons are tuned to ignore flocks of birds or smaller, so they don’t see these small Turkish drones coming (nor do they see the artillery spotter drones).
5
@zackzaney5563 It’s not a matter of looking for stuff to copy, it’s to look for weaknesses to exploit.
4
@noir1923 Who, the U.S.? The U.S. uses these air defense systems to test its own weapons under development, so it’s not like they’re just laying around in storage. If the U.S. is sending the systems to Ukraine, it’s because it thinks that Ukraine self-defense is more important than our own weapon development.
2
@Carbiniz3r Look up “Constant Peg” and “Tonopah a Test Range”. I think you’d be interested, maybe amused. It’s also interesting that this secret program was used to conceal an even more secret program!
2
@glennchartrand5411 as does Area 52 in Nevada.
1
FWIW, the CIA will not be first in line for that jammer. Either NSA or DIA will get first shot. Very likely that a private company such as Raytheon will be the one to do the first full analysis. Remember, although U.S. intelligence agencies co-operate (or are supposed to), each one has a lane (although lanes can and do overlap). Signals Intelligence is the NSA lane, with some overlap with DIA. Raytheon is a big military contractor that has a lot of EW experience, which is why I think they will be the first to dissect it.
1