Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Did Gobekli Tepe Appear Out of Nowhere? A Reply to Graham Hancock" video.

@gregfoster1106 You’re mistaking incredulity for anger. But is anger really out of place? You’d be angry is someone handed you a stinking load of crap and told you it was shoe polish. Mostly, we’re all really tired of you conspiracy nuts of various flavors. If you clearly labeled your ideas as speculative fiction, no one would have a problem.
2
@Bingobanana4789 Dude, you’re going by when the sites were discovered, not when they were built.
2
I don’t think that would help. Once the brain dies, it’s dead. You can’t grow a new one.
1
@jeremiahh.3383 I realize that you didn’t pass 6th grade, but when we say taught in schools, we mean introductory university courses. It might or might not be in high school textbooks. Those are a lot slower to update.
1
@SWOTHDRA “The technologically advanced Los Civilization never ever traveled above current sea level, let alone created permanent structures.” Gee, that sounds highly believable. There are potential early sites that would document early migrations that are currently submerged. But a technologically advanced civilization wouldn’t just disappear beneath the waves.
1
About that last thing you talked about, the stance that Mr. Ancient Aliens would eagerly accept a completely unsupported and outlandish theory over much less outlandish one. Even if there wasn’t the massive amount of evidence for slow development, the “Lost Civ” speculation is intellectually and creatively lazy. (I’m of the opinion that wild fantasizing is less creative than trying to figure things out from limited facts. The later is called problem solving, the former is jerking off.)
1
No one is saying that societies were not in contact and were not sharing information and culture. What is being refuted is the idea of a far advanced “Lost Civilization” for which there is zero proof.
1