Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Are NATO forces directly engaging Russia? (No)" video.

  1.  @cornellhoward3757  There is still not a shred of evidence to back your statement.
    17
  2. He’s like the Russell Brand of Ben Shapiros. I can’t tell from which direction on the political spectrum he sits, but that might be because the looney left and the looney right are near indistinguishable.
    13
  3.  @jimmiller5600  The original statement was about Congressional approval, not declaration. Congress did approve the Gulf War and OIF, they just did it without a formal declaration of war.
    6
  4.  @RyanMcBethProgramming  The thing I really hate is blow drying the shotgun after bathing it in the tub.
    4
  5.  @frf5000  There is one person at the top of the chain of command, who is the top civilian executive as well as the commander in chief of the armed forces. That person, the President, CAN send our country to war intentionally or unintentionally. However, it’s also true that Presidents have consulted with others and build some sort of consensus before doing so. So your technically wrong. But the person you replied to, M Vega, is a dummy with no clue about how our constitutional government is supposed to work and has worked for over two centuries, and why we chose an executive branch distinct from the legislative branch back when the constitution was written. He’s basically saying, “Isn’t anybody troubled that we have an elected leader, rather than a politburo? Gosh, I sure am!” Going back to your being technically wrong, you’re also sort of right in practice. As I said, an American President has the authority. But that doesn’t mean he has absolute power. In a democracy it’s not enough to give an order, you have to have competent people willing to execute that order. If an order is completely insane, they can block it long enough for you to be legally relieved of command. Our President doesn’t have absolute power and we have safeguards. I think that might have been what you wanted to say.
    2
  6. You can speculate all you want about who is a deep cover “operator”, but unless there’s evidence, it’s meaningless speculation. Your mom is a deep cover operative for the U.S. military. I cannot provide evidence because her cover story is that good. That lack of evidence, along with a giant leap of logic, proves my statement. OTOH, what you described actually fits the “Little Green Men” that occupied Crimea, which has been corroborated by the Russians. They admitted it. That said, no doubt that the U.S. has intelligence operatives in Ukraine. Most likely the majority are Ukrainians, not U.S. citizens.
    1
  7. He might be able to talk fast, but he lacks flow and his bars are subpar. His logic is mythical and his myth is illogical. He’s like the love child of Jordan Peterson, and Jordan Peterson’s grandmother.
    1
  8. I’d say there’s a big difference, though. Before February 2022, Canada, U.S., and UK had many uniformed trainers and advisers in Ukraine. They were pulled out before the shooting started. Possibly a handful of special forces remained. Training continues outside of Ukraine, but the Ukraine supporting coalition is avoiding putting regular military boots on the ground. With regards to the supposed 97 special forces soldiers inside of Ukraine, that might be total number that have been rotated in and out, but I doubt they have all been present simultaneously. That’s IF they are in fact there at all.
    1
  9. The “fast talker” is also the guy trying to bamboozle you by talking faster than you can register and take in his words. This fillip lettuce guy is trying to slip past objections by talking too fast. It’s not that he’s over excited or emotional, it’s that he’s trying to get his audience to react emotionally.
    1