Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Caught on camera: Man shot over parking space in Waxahachie" video.
-
@johnwilliams6880 Jacob has a point, though. Texas has robust stand-your-ground laws. Watch the video again. The person in the robe is standing their ground, a short distance away. The other person is yelling loudly and angrily. If the person with the gun was yelling, it’s not as audible or as audible. The person who was shot begins walking toward the person with the gun.
I’m not sure if the “just dropping me off from work” excuse will hold up from the person who was shot. There seems to be plenty of other places where he could have been dropped off.
All I know is that we only saw part of the argument. The Ring footage might reveal more. We don’t know what criminal record the woman had (I think the shooter was a woman) or that the guy had. The woman might be the upstanding citizen here, while the guy has the criminal record. We don’t know anything about the previous confrontations, but there might be Ring video of that, too. I think I’d want to hear everything better on the video. You can’t really make out what the man is yelling and I can’t hear what the woman with the gun said at all.
We do know that a judge AND the prosecutor didn’t feel the woman was a risk, and allowed her to bond out. I don’t think liberal or conservative had anything to do with it, but let us note that Texas is a conservative state. Chances are the judge is a Republican and was appointed by a Republican.
Morally, I think it’s wrong to shoot someone in the course of an argument over a parking space. Legally, the woman with the gun probably has a strong defense. There is a lot we don’t know that will be investigated in full by the police. There might be a lot of evidence in her favor that causes the prosecutor to drop the case.
6
-
5
-
The imminent threat is open to interpretation. Would your mind change if the shooter was a woman? The shooter’s name is Nikki.
The truth is, there’s a lot we don’t know about the circumstances. But based on what we can see in the video, this woman’s legal justification seems stronger than that of Kyle Rittenhouse. Judging the body language and who is yelling the loudest, the woman appears calm and the burly dude with tattoos on his neck seems overly angry about being asked to move his car.
If you think Rittenhouse was justified, it’s hard to see why you wouldn’t think this woman wasn’t also justified. But again, more evidence will come out from the police investigation. I think with young Mr. Rittenhouse, the jury got it right, even though there was evidence that he went out there looking for trouble and that he technically had illegal possession of his rifle.
With regard to the judge and the bond, odds are the judge was appointed by a conservative governor. We’re talking about Texas. Also if the prosecutor felt strongly that the woman was a risk, he might have convinced the judge not to grant a bond. In matters of risk, judges are more likely to side with the prosecutor. The probability here is that the woman has a clean record while the shooting victim has a criminal record.
Honestly, if you are an advocate for Stand Your Ground laws, it’s surprising that you’d rush to judgement against this woman.
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1