Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "Econ Lessons"
channel.
-
5
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ivanbacic6771 I know it sucks right now, but remember that it’s the voters that shape economic policies over time. You’re up against the Boomers even more than the super rich. As they leave the voting pool ( 💀), you’ll have greater power to elect representatives and leaders that will enact policies to give workers more opportunities—in terms of buying a house this means changes to zoning laws, changes to redevelopment policies, and incentives to build cheaper housing.
Here is the thing about capitalism you need to think about (and I think even Bernie Sanders would agree). It can be tweaked to suit the goals of society. In a democratic society (i.e., what we call the Western World), citizens get to decide those goals (by whom they elect) and they get to determine the economic tweaks (by the same democratic mechanism).
The biggest obstacles to this are apathy and ignorance.
I’m actually a conservative, but I think conservative policy has had its ride over the past 30-40 years. Conservatives have gotten everything they’ve wanted policy-wise, and there’s nowhere left for them to go. Which is why you see the phenomena of “culture war”, “Christian Nationalism”, authoritarianism, and populism based on a cult of personality. The conservative movement is dead, replaced by something both dreadful and stupid. (I’m not saying conservatism is dead; conservative principles are still valid and can still play a role if the fascists can be defeated.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Danster82 You’re correct on your last few points, but I don’t think you understand what the Federal Reserve System is or how it works. Its independence (or semi-independence) is a good thing. It is not subject to the expedient short term whims of politicians. It is the most transparent of any central banking system, making its decisions and the reasoning behind those decisions public. It regularly publishes the data it uses to reach those decisions.
It has specific goals, the overall goal being the stability of the system. The two target benchmarks (or sub goals) it uses are low unemployment and stable pricing (i.e., moderating inflation and deflation). It also is a lot less powerful than you think. It can only nudge the economy one way or another with a handful of interventionist tools. The Fed doesn’t really control the economy, it affects it to the degree that it can.
Maybe someday the Fed can be replaced with a computer program, but we are not there yet.
I like to see capitalism as a social technology, and I agree with you that we, as a democratic society, get to decide what social goals capitalism should serve and how it can be adjusted to serve those goals. This is currently the case, but through apathy and ignorance we have set goals that serve the few and we have adjusted the engine of our economy to serve the few.
The problem is that we have been too apathetic and ignorant to set better societal goals. We haven’t really answered the question, who is society for? Instead, we’ve defaulted to serving the wealthy no matter what. I’m a conservative and I say conservatism has had its run and we’ve gone too far in that direction. The fiscal policies promoted by conservatism are tools that were useful for a period, but its past time that we used other tools to tweak the motor of out economy (which is capitalism, if you’ve been following my analogy).
As a democracy, we get to decide the purpose of our society and we get to decide how to modify the engine to suit that purpose. We get to decide if society should be a race car, a luxury sedan, a form of public transportation, or some mix. Where do we go, how do we get there, what safety features are part of the system are among the important questions we should be answering. We should be addressing those questions instead of engaging in this authoritarian culture war crap and maga populism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1