Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "JCS - Criminal Psychology" channel.

  1.  @carterthefarter3855  The shove wasn’t justified. It’s defined as battery, a crime. But shooting an unarmed man backing away is murder. Agreed? I understand that shoving someone arguing with your spouse might feel justified or relatable. And it doesn’t justify being murdered. I’m not saying that the victim bears any responsibility, not in anyway. As we know, the whole thing was instigated by the self appointed parking lot monitor. Just the same, the shove wasn’t legally justified—if the man hadn’t been killed, he might have faced his day in court.
    83
  2. Well, now that he’s been sentenced to 20 years, who’s going to tase the litterbugs in the parking lot?
    48
  3. Joe He was incompetent, lazy, and still hoping for an easy win: getting a confession. He was trying to steamroller an innocent man. His incompetence and laziness showed right from the start when he said he wanted to get a sense of Michael, whether this was the first crime Michael had done or if he was a career criminal. Let me explain what this means: THE INVESTIGATOR STARTED THE INTERVIEW ADMITTING HE HADNT EVEN CHECKED IF MICHAEL HAD A CRIMINAL RECORD. (Sorry, I thought that merited all caps.) Then he said there were witnesses that had identified Michael but never mentioned a line up (or other method). This should be a tip off that 1) witnesses had not identified Michael, 2) the detective hadn’t spoken with any witnesses. If the investigator had no evidence, but merely a strong suspicion, he should have released Michael. If evidence was discovered proving Michael’s guilt, they could rearrest him. It happens all the time (and should happen more often if all police acted as professionally as they should). You bring in your “person-of-interest” for questioning, as you’re investigating. If they don’t
    10
  4.  @armentumhominum9931  Yup. This right here. Being a man doesn’t mean being stupid. And if the guy doesn’t walk away, let him run out of steam. One can stand there and just stare at someone until they either realize they’re acting the fool or they just get tired out. I will admit I learned this lesson in de-escalation by being stupid. I learned that “protecting my honor” is not considered self defense in the courtroom. 😩.
    10
  5. That’s lying, not “presenting false evidence”. If the investigating officer here told a court that there was a videotape showing Michael robbing the store, that testimony would be false evidence and perjury (which would obviously be discovered when the prosecution failed to produce the video). If the investigator told the judge there was video tape in order to get a search warrant, that would be false evidence and perjurious. If the investigator tells a lie to a suspect to get a reaction, that’s one thing. This investigator went beyond that when continued to lie when he didn’t get the reaction he had hoped, and piled lies upon lies. This wasn’t an interrogation, it was psychological torture inflicted on an innocent man because the investigator wanted a quick win based on no evidence, merely a confession.
    2
  6. OCD much? Hahaha, I noticed it, too. It was hypnotic.
    2
  7.  @KingKenTM  “This is Bill, anyone got a 20 on Sam?” “Rodger that, Bill. Sam is 10-100.” Some codes are pretty common for people that use radios (walkie-talkies) in their line of work. Do you copy? 😄
    2
  8. dOlli3cOutur3 I’m glad that worked out for you despite being subject to unfair accusations. However, don’t rely on your store’s security guards. If your store is part of a chain, they might have a corporate team or outside investigators install cameras without the store security knowing.
    2
  9. Yes it was. It was also nice to see that Michael took the law enforcement agency (or city) to court and was awarded damages.
    1
  10. Serial killers are missing out. Planning on how to dispose of the body is one of the best parts of the job.
    1