Comments by "MarcosElMalo2" (@MarcosElMalo2) on "KCAL News"
channel.
-
51
-
51
-
44
-
22
-
20
-
17
-
15
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
Bad advice. If you just pull over and accept a speeding ticket without arguing with the officer issuing the citation, youâre not going to âget caughtâ. Just donât be stupid and give them probable cause. If you donât pull over, theyâre watching for people in the car throwing things out the window. If youâre driving under the influence, first of all DONâT, second of all, alcohol stays in your bloodstream for longer than you might think, and they WILL check.
If youâre on probation and you value your freedom, keep your tags current and obey traffic laws, and remember that one of the conditions of your probation is that the police donât need probable cause to search you or your vehicle. You wonât need to flee from the police because you wonât be noticed by the police if you put in a minimal effort of keeping your shit in order.
Joeâs advice here is terrible. Donât believe him. Running is going to compound every legal problem you have. Your not going to be one of the 00.1% of drivers that get away. The best way to evade the police is to not be noticed by them in the first place, and if they do notice you (speeding or some other traffic violation), get the business over as smoothly and quickly as possible. Some officers will try to rattle you, but maintain a respectful attitude for a couple of minutes and youâll be on your way.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
 @theboingster6947 We donât have to even rely on information from SBPD. Itâs clear from the video that the suspect drew a firearm while struggling with a police officer.
Iâve seen other reports here on YouTube. Even if we discount the account given by the authorities, we can see what happened with our own eyes.
As for the larger context, the SBPD does have a reputation and history of racism. Itâs right to approach their information with skepticism. But I donât think they would fabricate a 911 call or the suspectâs criminal recordâif they did, it would come out later. On the other side, we have a few locals who say he was a good guy and that he was the unofficial security guard of the parking lot. Perhaps he was. That still doesnât negate the fact that he drew a firearm on a police officer.
If you care about Police Reform and fighting institutional racism, this isnât the example you want to use. Just from the video available, itâs a justified shooting. It hurts the BLM cause to use this as an example, especially when there are many clear examples of police abuse. And other than random commenters on YouTube and random people in the neighborhood, I donât see community leaders coming forward to call out injustice here. No reputable lawyer (or any lawyer) representing the suspects family is decrying this violence. As you well know, these types of family representatives are in front of the news cameras within hours when there are legitimate questions about police conduct.
Until there is further evidence to the contrary, Iâm going to urge anyone who cares about Black Lives to not hold this case up as an example. It hurts the cause in reality. There are plenty of cases to go around without using this as an example.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
 @joserosa6880 The summer protests didnât try to stop our elected officials from performing their ordained constitutional duties, which in this case was the counting of electoral votes. The protestors werenât calling for the lynching of Mike Pence, the fascist insurrectionists were, and even brought handcuffs with them. The summer protestors werenât performing a coup, while the fascists arguably were: taking over one of our branches of government.
It should be pointed out that there were peaceful protesters at the Trump rally that no reasonable person would call a terrorist. Similarly, most of the BLM protestors were peaceful, but were attacked and arrested by riot police as if they posed a violent threat.
Another difference was that, while many liberal leaders expressed sympathy and moral support for the peaceful protests, none condoned the rioters and looters. On the other hand, President Trump supported, encouraged, and directed the violent fascists that stormed the Capitol. He didnât call them off until they had accomplished their deplorable deed (or as much as they were going to that day), and when he did ask them to go home, he expressed affection for them.
But the biggest difference is the goals, and this is where the word terrorist comes into play. The BLM protestors were calling for social change, and an end to institutional racism in police departments. The Trumpers that attacked the Congress wanted to overturn a free and fair election. One is purely political, the other is social. One group was to calling attention to a problem, the other was an attempting to overturn democracy, rule of law, and the Constitution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
 @onetwo6039 No. The taco trucks are strictly regulated by the county board of health. They pay for a permit for the privilege. The inspection regime is arguably harsher than for restaurants. So if a taquero reported this stand, itâs because they werenât permitted and not playing by the rules.
About ten years ago, the county was under pressure from restaurant owners to shut down ALL the taco trucks. The taco trucks fought like hell to stay open, and they fought for the right to be licensed, inspected, and treated like any other food business. The taqueros banded together and hired legal representation. They lobbied the board of supes. And they won.
And here comes some pendejo, who is not only flouting the law, flouting the health of the public, but is putting the livelihoods of all taqueros at risk. One big outbreak of salmonella, all the taqueros get blamed by the public.
Also, the cops donât get called in until the second or third visit by the health inspector who found the violator.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Is it a euphemism? It describes the criminal activity accurately. Robbery occurs, and itâs organized online (supposedly) among random strangers. Iâm not sure about this one, howeverâfour guys? If they knew each other it wouldnât qualify as a âflash mobâ. Itâs when you get a hundred people showing up, not everyone knowing everyone else, that it qualifies as a flash mob. At least that is my understanding.
Some sort of organizing does occur in a flash mob, but itâs hard to say if itâs an ongoing criminal enterprise, which is the usual definition of organized crimeâsuch as the Mafia or a drug trafficking network. As far as calling it petty crime, are you looking at the crime of an individual involved, or the overall crime. These criminals are hitting stores as a group, and the thefts/damages mount into tens of thousands of dollars. That well exceeds the bar for petty crime.
So as I said, âFlash Mob Robberyâ isnât a gentle euphemism. Itâs accurate name for the behavior. You could also call it looting. A gentle euphemism would be along the lines of âa large group permanently borrowing things without permissionâ. That said, euphemisms often enter language and we know what they mean. Take âshopliftingâ as an example. It means stealing from a shop, but nowhere does the word contain robbery or stealing. It is or was originally, a slang term and still is an idiomatic word.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1