Comments by "FD 2003" (@FD2003Abc) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. Objection: When she said "let's shake hands" she waived her victim status. She then went to strong-arm robbery.
    113
  2. "n Japan, there is a presumption of guilt rather than innocence" -- So the Japanese have had #Metoo built into their system.
    84
  3. That happened in 2020.
    75
  4.  @abberss  Your chances of getting killed by the police are significantly higher if you are white. Deaths of people of color at the hands of law enforcement are statistically insignificant compared to white males. BLM is based on a factual lie.
    35
  5. I would like to know why you think these terms are evasive? I am around Justice Kavanaugh's age. * "Ralph/Ralf" DOES mean to throw up (also "Buck") * "Devil's Triangle" IS a drinking game I played in college * Why does Ranate mean anything other than a female buddy? But thanks for showing how to lay a "perjury trap."
    32
  6.  @AnimusPrime87  We can only hope
    13
  7. objection overruled: ford is fuglier than a beagle.
    7
  8.  @margaretwilson8736  Yes -- this is SO different than any and ever other 17 YO guy that ever lived. Before it was online scrubbed, you could read ballsey ford's yearbook where she showed HER promiscuity. "Drinking Beer + sexual references in HS = Not fit to exist." You lefties crack me up.
    6
  9.  @prakharanand5760  @Zoltan Man, THAT flew over your head!
    6
  10. Like joe and hunter biden.
    6
  11. Impeachable Offense: defeating Her in 2016.
    6
  12. You make assertions not contentions. BLM is based on a factual fallacy that you are extending. Good day.
    5
  13.  @DrRhinoceros  Straw man. If blacks encounter police at a significantly statistically higher rate than others then the results of those encounters will go bad more "frequently." None of the statistics gather whether the deadly encounters are a result of "didn't do nuthin." "hands up don't shoot" is a factual lie. If you graph the criminal activity by race to the death at the hands of cops by race you will see that whites are the victims more often. Basing an entire movement on a lie is just a bad idea. Just like basing an entire line of argumentation is. Your inability to discern the difference between an assertion and contention is smirkingly noted BTW.
    5
  14. 1/20/2021
    4
  15. Now that we know that "literally" means "figuratively" then does that mean that things not to be taken literally are not to be taken figuratively?
    4
  16. Because it so quickly crosses over into free speech issues.
    4
  17. He became a naturalized citizen. No need for mental gymnastics if one is not an ignoramus.
    4
  18. @Div/0: It is where the cool kids hang out.
    3
  19.  @gorillaau  Keel hauling.
    3
  20. I was on pins and needles.
    2
  21. I thought everyone knew that.
    2
  22. They do that now
    2
  23. Did you say "Murders and Acquisitions?"
    2
  24. I withdraw my previous objection re: L&O
    2
  25. My man Legal Eagle should stay away from politics. It clouds his analytical abilities. The transcript speaks for itself. NOWHERE did President Trump say "do this or else I withhold aid." MUCH different than EXACTLY what plugs did to get his kid, who had zero knowledge of the energy sector, to get a $50K a MONTH job. If they want to audit Trump, they should audit every candidate. plugs would be in jail.
    2
  26.  @ZafeHaven  It was sarcasm.
    2
  27. Real people have to report what they do for a liv8ng. Slackers cry and file lawsuits.
    2
  28. "Why?" Think Paper Chase. Everyone wants to be John Houseman.
    2
  29. I was a subscriber back when you were < 100K. Just saying.
    2
  30. Bottom line: The Court used horse sense.
    1
  31. Usually I ignore your commercials. But Deep Sentinel has my attention.
    1
  32. Ally McBeal = short short SHORT skirts. Did I mention the short skirts? And darn skinny.
    1
  33. You cannot fight a myth. If AGW was real, there would be one model and it would be predictive. Number of AGW models: 1000+. Number of AGW accurate predictions: zero. It is not is the planet changing overall temperature -- it has never been static. Are humans causing it now. Because: science.
    1
  34.  @jellevaneijk9397  There is not a single so-called prediction that is traceable to AGW. What you are describing is called "weather." "Out of whack" is not a scientific description. The fact we are experiencing some weather pattern differences means nothing. You need only look at why Greenland is called that (for example) to know the planet Earth has weather pattern swings. Yours is not a science-based response. It is repetition of political talking points, designed for the ignorant masses. AGW meets exactly zero criteria for a Scientific Theory. That is a fact, not opinion. For AGW to even be considered for INCLUSION as a proper scientific line of inquiry, it would have to: 1) Have a UNIFIED model that would provably demonstrate what climate and weather patterns would be IN THE ABSENCE OF HUMANS. This would be the baseline. 2) Produce a predictive UNIFIED model that describes how weather patterns will be with AGW in substantially more detail than what "we think there will be more hurricanes." 3) Describe in scientific detail how AGW is responsible for the delta. AGW can do none of these things. It is ironic a scientific ignoramus who spouts nonsense would call me an idiot. I noted in my comment that the planet is changing all the time -- it is up to science to prove it is due to humans. It fails miserably in science. In politics, it succeeds admirably in herding sheep who bleat the same refrain.
    1
  35.  @jellevaneijk9397  Your measurement stick is very small (planetary climate change is measured in eons, epochs, etc. not mere centuries), you address exactly zero of the points I made about science, you repeat the talking points and then say "it is just too hard" when provided the criteria ANY scientific statement is measured by. Bottom line, neither your talking points nor supposed science reports themselves (which are not science reports by the way) scientifically link the changing weather patterns to humans. In science terms, AGW does not even make it to the "Hypothesis" stage. It is all post hoc ergo propter hoc. You use the term "scientific consensus" which DOES NOT EXIST IN SCIENCE. If 99% of scientists said pi was 3.2 would that make it so? The very use of the term tells me you know NOTHING about science. Learn some science (even a little) and then return to the discussion.
    1
  36.  @jellevaneijk9397  The first rule about hole digging is stop digging. All your twaddle results in the same: You do not know anything about science and are dancing as fast as possible to cover that fact. Learn REAL science. Not a couple of courses no doubt taught by left-wing professors with an agenda (are there any other kind?). It does not surprise me that when I confront you with real science you get angry. That is the normal reaction for children who are told there is no Santa Claus. There was not a SINGLE word of science in your response. If you want to talk politics, fine. Just admit it. Science has not been this misused since Global Cooling although Eugenics comes close to the level of AGW.
    1
  37.  @martinpfeilsticker5420  so you do nothing - and on the taxpayer $
    1
  38. I did a little math. If 250,000 cars tried to drive to A51, the bet they could do was 4 abreast. This means there would be a traffic jam 200 miles long! Long walk there folks, pack a lunch and a dinner and some breakfasts -- 10 of them if you are young, 20 if you are the Boomers who believe this stuff.
    1
  39. The moment an AI becomes self-aware the law will probably be moot since we humans will be enslaved to/by it.
    1
  40. Like Spock said of Khan -- "he (they) are intelligent but not experienced."
    1
  41.  @chadd990  IOW, "I do not have money, give me yours. Capitalism so YOU can make money. socialism so you can give it to ME."
    1
  42.  @NowAlessiExplainsHowYoureWrong  True, capitalism is the worst form of economics. Except all the others. Without capitalism, that computer you wrote your note with would not exist, much less YT to provide content upon which you comment.
    1
  43. Please produce the unified model that says this AND attributes it to human activity.
    1
  44.  @simondyroff  Works for 7 of 9!!!
    1
  45. Says the gun-grabber
    1
  46.  @pythontron8710  Oh yeah. He would charge someone for attempted murder because they undercooked chicken if it served his purpose. Perry Mason would have just gotten the chicken to confess even though it was in the gallery and not on the stand. When watching PM I always used to say if you are the perp for God's sake DON'T ATTEND THE TRIAL!
    1
  47. Is this your first "A?"
    1
  48. You left out the best scene: Where Pesci asks to address Marissa Torme as a hostile witness and he says she is his fiancee and the Judge grants the motion.
    1
  49. "Reproductive health"<> "killing babies." You know bc SCIENCE and LOGIC.
    1
  50. I was bugged when I and my attorney met in opposing counsel's "private conference room" when we were suing my insurance company. Several things we discussed "privately" such as some very specific health conditions came up in arbitration a few days later. I still kicked their ass. But I never forgot the lesson.
    1