Comments by "Anders Juel Jensen" (@andersjjensen) on "Ukraine shoots down multiple Russian jets" video.

@TheThirstyOtter Ukraine teased a video of an F-16 in Ukrainian battle colors just a few hours ago.
5
The F-16 has three advantages over every other air multi role fighter jet on the planet: 1) It is THE most produced plane in terms of raw numbers. 2) It has multiple manufacturers for many of it's components (engines, landing gear consumables, etc) and large stock piles exist in various countries. 3) It is the plane that is compatible with the largest number of NATO ordnance catalogue items. Basically, "if it is air delivered the F-16 can deliver it". The F-16 is not the best in any single category (except versatility, which isn't "a single category") but it is pretty much always in top 5 or top 3 in every contest. Any plane that beats the F-16 in one category also loses to it in 3-5 others (Like the F-22 and F-15 are beating it in agility, but losing in carry capacity, operational range, mission pod expansion capability and weapons choice). So if you have unlimited budget to run completely different training and logistics tails in each category you'd chose the F-22 as your point air superiority fighter and have it backed up by F-15s "to finish the job", and you'd run the F-35 as your point strike fighter and have it backed up by F/A-18 Super Hornet as "flying bomb trucks". If, on the other hand, your hamstrung for cash, resources and infrastructure, and reliant on friends to keep you afloat, the F-16 is exactly what you want. It was, right from it's inception, designed to be a low cost, low maintenance do-it-all-pretty-well plane for NATO allies that couldn't afford to have a dedicated plane for every specific role. It is basically "the Swiss army knife" of air craft. A dedicated tool is better, but an army knife can do them all. In short, it was designed to fight Russia on all Russia's weak points: Raw numbers, logistics and flexibility. So it's kinda befitting that here, 40 years later, the F-16 was chosen for Ukraine for the exact same reasons as it was produced to begin with. Hope that helped get an idea of what exactly "the F-16 mentality" is.
4
@robertatkins9419 Strange that Ukraine dropped a video of an F-16 in Ukrainian colors, and looking completely mint in a white hangar, only 4 hours after this video vent live. Complete coincidence. Anders, being a professional military analyst at the Naval Academy, just pulls random bullshit out of his ass for propaganda purposes... and then gets lucky every single time. Honestly he should quit his job and become a professional gambler with that kind of luck.
3
What? Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary and all the former Yugoslavia countries are former Soviet block counties. And they're all NATO members now. We didn't "expand in to them"... they screamed "Heeelp! We're finally free, and we'd like it to STAY that way!" and joined NATO basically at any condition and any cost we demanded from them. So I think you should look into getting both your history and geography knowledge.. you know.. updated a little. That former Soviet block countries didn't even blink before joining NATO, but Sweden and Finland needed an all out war in the middle of Europe to wake up, should tell you everything you need to know about the nature of Russia.
2
@a564-c3q AWACS are also operating in the international waters of the Black Sea. Remember that "incident" where a Russian Mig "spilled" fuel on a US Reaper drone over the Black Sea? That was also over international waters.
2
Ukraine just published a video teasing a dark grey F-16 with the Trident on the tail.
2
Hushhhhh! The Ruskies aren't supposed to know that AMRAAM 120C and D can receive mid-flight course correction from AWACS.
2
AWACS are constantly patrolling in international waters in the Black Sea, and near the border in Poland. There is basically no place where Russia can take off from, that isn't out of operational range, that isn't directly observed by AWACS. And nobody's guaranteeing that Ukraine isn't taking off from Romania, and flying really low until they reach Ukrainian air space.
2
@Neptune-ku1es Shoigu has already claimed 6 downed F-16s and Ukraine posted a teaser video with an F-16 in Ukrainian colors just a couple of hours ago. Between those two we can pretty much call it confirmation at this point.
2
@pragmaticskeptic Absolute BS. Any 1.5km stretch of pavement without pot-holes that has been freshly swept will do. The landing gear on the F-16 is not some fragile thing that has special requirements, it just tends to suck up debris because it's air intake is so low. I think Ukraine can fix pot-holes and attach rotor brushes to tractors.
2
As per the video Ukraine just dropped of an F-16 in Ukrainian battle colors, yes... The Ghost of Kyiv is now flying F-16 and already has a 5:0 score on his new platform.
1
Ukraine just dropped a video where they teased an F-16 in Ukrainian battle colors. They've chosen a dark gray that looks suspiciously close to the radar absorbing paint on the F-35. Don't know if that's psy-ops or the madlads actually got "a left-over can of that" from Lockheed-Martin and decided that a little is better than none at all.
1
When the Russians themselves acknowledges the loses no photos are needed.
1
Because it happened in Russian held territory. But the Russian VKS has acknowledged all 5 and send their condolences to the families. Anders wouldn't treat it as fact if there wasn't proper evidence.
1
Just getting JDAMs in the game would be huge. We have SO many of those, as they're just conversions of dumb bombs. But the full potential is hard to gauge, as the F-16 is compatible with the entire NATO catalogue of air delivered ordnance.
1
@drgonzo305 You hear the radar lock siren go off and see two planes in front of you blow to confetti, what do you do? Eject!
1
@tomk3732 The Danish ones are Block 52 with a subsequent radar upgrade from Block 72 and all the latest software updates, and if I understand things correctly, that is the combo that is being strived for across the entire F-16 Coalition. Lockheed Martin is being very forthcoming with parts and expertise and don't mind mixing and matching. Fun fact 1) Even original 1979 F-16s can be upgraded completely to Block 72. And now where Taiwan has just completed upgrading their 144 F-16s to Block 72 Lockheed Martin has excess production capacity. Nothing prevents Ukraine from ordering an upgrade kit if, say, Bulgaria gives them an old Block 25 or Block 30 plane. Fun fact 2) The 18 planes from Holland, the 19 planes from Denmark and the 10 planes from Norway are more than "two dozen". Belgium is "considering" 42 which means "Guys, we really need the funds from the sales of those in our defence budget... help us out here!". By the end of 2024 Ukraine will have at least 40 F-16s fully operational, and by the end of 2026 I wouldn't even blink if they have 100.
1
That is exactly what NASAMS is... an AMRAAM launcher with a radar on a separate vehicle.
1
@Grouse2275 Their NASAMS launchers already use the D model.... so they are already actively stocking them.
1
@lat78610 Assuming no AWACS assistance... but there are AWACS constantly patrolling the borders of both Poland and Romania.
1
The F-16 theory could be kicked around to confuse Russia, or it could be partially true. Holland sent 5 F-16s to a training facility in Northern Romania specifically for Ukrainian pilots. Combine that with the fact that there are NATO AWACS planes constantly patrolling both the Polish and Romanian borders. Their combined data covers nearly all of Ukraine (and a big chunk of the Black Sea). Now imagine, if you will, F-16s taking off from Romania and flying very very low until they're well into Ukraine, where they ascent and launch their AMRAAMs (range is 105km) based on AWACS data. AMRAAM supports "blind fire" where the missile goes to a pre-programmed location before it turns on it's own radar and homes in on the nearest target. The F-16 ducks below the horizon after launching, and goes back to Romania. If you squint really hard and tilt your head that could pass for "a live fire training mission in realistic conditions".
1
Nix all that... Ukraine dropped a video of an F-16 in Ukrainian colors just a few hours ago.
1
Yes it does. AIM-120D AMRAAM has range of 160km.
1
The VKS has confirmed them and sent their condolences to the families. Obviously the Russian MoD is not talking about it on TV. Instead they claimed to have shot down four F-16s.
1
4:42 "This is EXACTLY what a surprise appearance of F-16 would look like. Russian jets.. just suddenly.. falling out of the sky.." 6:51 "Maybe we will know by the time this video is out." YOU SLY DOG! YOU KNEW! YOU BLOODY DAMN KNEW ALREADY! (Ukraine has officially teased a video of an F-16 in Ukrainian battle colors, in a white hangar, just a few hours ago).
1
Zoom out and use the distance ruler you dork. Russia hasn't moved forward more than 15km in any place in the last 12 months. At this pace it will take them 6.5 years to reach the Donetsk Oblast border.
1
Ukraine just dropped a teaser video of an F-16 in Ukrainian colors... so when Anders said "Perhaps we will know by the time this video goes up" he was a tiny bit premature... but already knew.
1
@alcosound AMRAAM 120D has a range of 160km when fired from the ground in NASAMS launchers which is, obviously, at no speed and no altitude. So even a low flying F-16 that gets radar data from the AWACSs constantly roaming the Black Sea could have made all the kills in question.
1
All estimates on training, that has been given publicly, are based on peace time observations. That is, a 40 hour work week and "normal motivation". A Ukrainian pilot, who is already licenced for one, two or maybe three other jets, who has absolutely no problem getting up at 5:30 and do nothing but study textbooks, train in the simulator and do physical exercise until 10:00 where he hits the bunk, is going to compress that time frame quite a bit.
1
@sebastiand152 I don't have an estimation. From what I understand there has been already set up multiple courses of different length to accommodate different existing skill levels. The first Ukrainian pilots started training in the US a year ago, with the primary goal of uncovering which areas needed a lot of training, and which areas could either be condensed or omitted.
1
The Russian VKS has confirmed all 5 losses, so that one doesn't need footage, and the Ukrainians just published a teaser video of an F-16 in Ukrainian colors a couple of hours ago. This boils it down to "Was it Patriot, NASAMS, F-16 or a combination?" which, honestly, doesn't matter all that much. What matters is that now Russia needs to put further constraints on their air force unless they want this happening all day every day.
1
Nope. These 5 the Russians have actually acknowledged (well, the VKS has, not the Russian MoD) and attributed to Ukraine.
1
S-300 has a crap radar with a very recognisable (and loud) signature.
1
@tordsteiro9838 I honestly don't think it will happen. Sweden would love to get an export contract, and Ukraine is generally in "give it to us and we'll figure out how to make it work"-mode, and I can certainly see the appeal in the Gripen's ability to take off from any paved highway. But realistically, by the time Ukraine is ready to start considering the logistics tail of the Gripen they will have pushed Russia's air assets so far back, and have so much AA capability of their own, that the hole the Gripen is supposed to plug isn't there any more. The Gripen is an excellent dog fighter, but dog fighting is something you'd principally like to avoid at nearly all cost.
1