Comments by "Anders Juel Jensen" (@andersjjensen) on "Ukraine's plan for victory" video.

@simonschneider5913 So calling a guy who's the media liaison for the military academy that informs the state, and a guy who works with defense procurement for a living, "professional" is a stretch? They both describe how all parties involved see the conflict, but somehow calling that neutral is totally ridiculous? Would you be so kind as to explain what you think "professional" and "neutral" means?
42
My "peace plan" goes as follows: 1) The Secretary General of NATO writes a polite letter to Putin explaining that in 30 days a peace keeping contingent of 100k soldiers arrives in Ukraine, and a carrier battle group arrives in the Black Sea. The goal of the operation is to ensure the territorial integrity of both Russia and Ukraine, as currently neither are able to do so themselves. 2) Putin flaps his lips about nuclear weapons. Lavrov eats another booger. Medvedev posts more drunken tweets. 3) Zelensky tries not to laugh while he is "forced at gunpoint to withdraw from the Kursk region". 4) Putin chickens out and declares that Russia has successfully demilitarized Ukraine which is why NATO is now moving in. 5) On the 29th day the last Russian soldier leaves Ukraine per the 1991 (or rather 1954) lines. 6) Russia realizes that before sanctions will be lifted they will have to make FURTHER concessions than just the territorial ones. Among others to agree to transferring all frozen assets to Ukraine as reparation. 7) Ukraine sees massive financial investment in exchange for extraction contracts on oil, gas and rare earth metals as soon as they've complete the NATO ascension procedure.
2
@truthseekerodinson5094 I reply for the sake of others reading along. The krembots don't bother engaging in proper discussion.
1