Comments by "Anders Juel Jensen" (@andersjjensen) on "Anti-Gun Partisan Lawfare? GWACS Sues KE Arms et al." video.

@tcbbct509 Ford can very well make "LS" engines. Note the quotes. Building an engine which has all the same critical dimensions (key word being critical), but is developed from the ground up by Ford would hold up in court perfectly fine. Unless they use a manufacturing process which is under valid patent by GM, use a mechanism in the engine which is under valid patent by GM or directly make moulds off an actual LS engine (wouldn't work anyway) there is nothing to sue for. Making interchangeable parts is not illegal. You can buy pretty much every single component of an LS engine from alternate vendors. Obviously they're "the performance variant" with a corresponding price tag, but you can already build an "LS" which has exactly zero GM parts in it because the remaining parts are from subcontractors to GM (bearings, seals, bolt, etc). And this is because there is absolutely nothing left under valid patent for a pushrod V8. You can't patent dimensions alone. Heck, you can't even copyright dimensions.
10
Is that even possible for such long thin walls when we're talking high percentage fiber glass mixes? And how would you make the butt stock hollow?
1