Comments by "MrSpamaccount" (@MrSpamaccount) on "Journeyman Pictures" channel.

  1. it was 20 years ago, screw up what?
    4
  2. China betrayed USSR for yankees, Khruschev demonised and discredited USSR by blaming mutual crimes of soviet elite on Stalin, obviously exaggerating his guilt. Socialism in one country was not a mistake, otherwise USSR would have had sucked a big dick keeping in mind how 'world socialist movement' acted in europe during WW2. Serving nazis, obviously or dying in unfair fight with Gestapo as european communists did. Anyway, idea of socialism in one country was adopted after communist revolution in Germany failed. Who would have satisfied needs of the communist movement globally, if there were no communists in the world except russians in power?
    2
  3. "Also the new capitalist media told them to embrace the market economy. When Yeltsin came with capitalism, they hoped for a golden age." This began since 1985, committed by CPSU, by Perestroyka policy. Also cowardly and cocksucking elites of USSR back then wanted to make friends with yankees, which led USSR to such a lousy end. If there was Stalin to rule USSR back then, we'd have communism globally already, but revolutionary socialists would have had blamed him in being a fascist dictator or whatever, sitting in their cosy cafes. When revolution in Russia took place, although it was led by 19th century hipsters (Stalin, btw, was not one of them, being a real revolutionary who operated in Russia, and who was in numerous exiles, hunted by police, not like that jewish joke Trotsky who joined Russian communist party after the revolution because it promised benefits for his western owners, probably) russian workers supported them, because socialists of sorts in russia prepared the ground for ages before. It was partly supported by peasantry. Speaking of Russia - majority obviously sees that USSR was a better place to live, despite the propaganda, moronic pepsi-drinking youngsters who believe in evil Stalin and gulag and all the shit you've mentioned above, of course think that possessing an Iphone is the best thing that could have happened to them, and as a prick who commented under this video claim that its an achievement of capitalism, though such bullshit was mentioned in sci-fi of early 20th century, if not 19th, and would have been obviously constructed anyway, because the idea existed already.
    2
  4. The only achievement of a lousy vietnamese couch revolutionary is that he may type english properly because his mother was bought by some american GI as a sex toy.
    1
  5. K lol, fall of colonialism in first place is the achievement of presence of communist ideology, moronic creature.
    1
  6. Don Peppe Donbass, 'dombass' is a shauvinistic nickname used by ukrainian nazis and morons.
    1
  7. K there are idiots saying that Nicholas II was a 'uniting' figure for Russia, so fucking what? Kumintang China proved to be unable to defend itself from colonial pressure of Japan. Communists with minor power proved to be able to unify and build such China that is second worlds power and is still on the rise. Same was done by communists in USSR - retarded agrarian country became second worlds power, so just fucking hide somewhere, clown.
    1
  8. +K this country lives times better than the most of countries with capitalism and 'private ownership' ironically, while being in isolation. Speaking of China it seems that their aims is to evade any kind of trouble with american markets and american business, since these both are dependent on each other, but China is vitally dependent yet. What i wish for moronic creatures like you is that indians and chinese would finally achieve consuming levels of average american.
    1
  9. +Justin Peden USSR was capable of producing equal quality computers on its own industrial base. My first PC was soviet made. If it was not destroyed we'd use our own, obviously. With the lack of choice, we have to use american developed, does not make them capitalist though. Capitalists make profits selling them, this is correct. Capitalists created computers - this is bullshit. Scientists and engineers did. And they wonderfully exist in any economic system. Also, your logic is as dumb as - Soviets launched Sputnik first = communists can create space rockets, and capitalists can not, though everyone knows that capitalists could a while ago, before they started using russian-made (commie developed) rockets to get to so-called 'international' space station. Keeping in mind both space programmes used nazi experience in rocketry research, and americans systematically blame soviets for stealing nazi technology, when soviets only tested some of V-2 rockets while themselves stole their chief designer. (because why not to? especially when your country is in ruins and developing from the ground is sorta expensive, while various morons on the other side of atlantic threaten to nuke all of your major cities) P.S. Chinese rely on capitalism because a) they made a deal with yankees in 70s to become their cheap labour depot b) that comes out of a - this brings them profits, as they are not able to sustain in producing so many goods for internal market, that is rather poor as a whole. Turning to capitalism for modern China would mean the end of China, just like this was for USSR, they saw it, they do not want it.
    1