Comments by "Grenade Tennis" (@hughjass1044) on "VisualPolitik EN" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. The only ones who are surprised by the failures of the USSS are those who are utterly ignorant of their history. There has been enough testimony come out over the years and enough volumes written to convince anyone that this outfit isn't fit to guard a henhouse. Read the testimony of the ER doctors who first saw Kennedy in Dallas. Those alone are enough to scare the shit out of you and they're only for starters! Failure is what this outfit is known for. It's only by the sheer grace of God and copious amounts of pure BS luck that many times more tragedies have been avoided. I spoke to an agent in Vancouver many years back and he told me the biggest thing they've got going for them is reputation. Everybody thinks they're invincible so not many try to test them. But the truth is that like all branches of the military, the public service and other government departments, they've become so politicized and weighted down with ass kissing, paper shuffling, butt covering bureaucrats who don't know if their arses were punched or bored that they can neither recruit nor retain the quality people they need to function properly. They've got numbers, sure; that's easy but what they haven't got, like every other department in the government, is competence. And their voluminous scandals and failures are dutifully swept under the rug and covered up to protect the bosses who are loyal to the politicians. That's why you never hear about most of them. Because of luck and coverup. The first word in "Secret Service" is "Secret" and that's not by accident!
    1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. A cross between Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders (at least the "advertised" versions of each before they both sold out and became standard grade "party" men at the worst possible moment) doesn't sound all that bad, actually. If you disregard the bleatings of the hardcore partisans, there's actually quite a bit of overlap between the two; at least insofar as the desires of those who'd be inclined to vote for them. They're both populists of a sort (or at least, talked like populists) and there was actually a considerable number of their supporters who had the other one as their 2nd choice. Imagine that! In many ways, they (or at least their supporters) both wanted to get to much the same place. It was only a matter of some disagreement about how to get there. Don't know much about this NZ woman except that the mainstream press all act like teenagers at a Justin Bieber autograph signing whenever she is even mentioned (which is NEVER a good situation!) but one thing is clear from the results of both the NZ and USA elections....... the voting public is actually quite patient and forgiving as long as they think you at least give a fuck about them! They know you'll never be perfect and you don't have to be. Hell, you don't even have to be competent;... look at Cuomo, FFS!! But you do have to at least appear to take people's concerns seriously and not come off like the voters are your enemy! Talk and act like you give a fuck and you'd be surprised how many will support you! Wow; what a concept!!
    1