Comments by "S Suwandi" (@ssuwandi3240) on "Donald Trump given ten days to ‘surrender’ to authorities in Georgia" video.

  1. Nigel won his debanking saga. Couldn't be more proud of his supporting a non establishment President
    8
  2. That's called protective speech as defined by US constitution. Very different to civil laws
    3
  3. Breaking news- that's called a protective speech as defined by US constitution.
    2
  4. I did and didn't hear any threat at all. Read the 1st Amendment if your schools never forced you to read and get scored at least for Civic exam.
    2
  5. One of the states with high unemployment rate while the end of moratoriums would be this August
    2
  6.  @tinavigilante3415  still no single rules that he broke! And the point of using a criminal law without a criminal intent is abs Lefties desperation.. Because he's going to petition against the Government for the change of voting law in midst of election that's the part that medias have covered up. They're on Establishment payroll ..
    1
  7. Wromg. The voting law was changed in midst of election in PA state. That's credible enough for petition against the current Government
    1
  8.  @treadstone1970  you ain't to be in the club you silly kiddo.. you think you support the upper 1% and they will be grateful.. how naive Simpleton like you never learn one basic lesson in life.. not fast enough
    1
  9.  @Steven-vo4ee  still got debanked by Natwest. Good thing he cared and brought up more corruptions going on in the industry you havent heard that i reckon.
    1
  10.  @bereal6590  maybe your parents should have taught you how to vote with right brain.. not his or anyone else job.. kiddp
    1
  11. No wonder NY city become a low class dumpster what a stupid mouthpiece i will never hire someone with quality of Gen Z NYers. Bye kid. Dont ever get married
    1
  12.  @davidmichels9454  nope. Criminal law justice doesn't cover a constitutionally protected speech. Civil rights such as freedom of speech are protected under American constitution. Differences in principles wouldn't make it as a crime. Without undoubted intent. The intent of his statement didn't indicate any notion to harm anybody. Which part you still reckon as a proof of threat ?
    1
  13. If your boss demands y0u as his staff to solve a misplaced cash would you accuse he or she a crime of racketeering? Boy i didn't hear his asking specific act of racketeering;)) but maybe someone's desperate imagination
    1
  14.  @mattjacks0n83  what threat? Have you listed to the call? I get it that blackAtlanta woman got shyte scared for something else..
    1
  15.  @davidmichels9454  well there wasn't any intent the case is weak nonsense pulled by desperate Lefties likely on $50k student loans.. who's fault was that? Poor but reckless debtors
    1
  16.  @thomasbullen5239  nobody intelligent is buying this silly nonsense only indebted Leftards and sexual leeches
    1
  17.  @tyleronearth  which crime? I have asked which part that indicated a racketeering intent? Your empty statement sounds a bit racketeering to me. Is it your reckless student loan problem? Good luck kid. Dont get married your fate is sealed.. the fault is bad gene, bad upbringing or bad luck your choice.
    1
  18.  @aroudedinsulance4307  well i didn't respond to who are you whiny Lefttard? Affirmative is no longer effective these days AT ALL
    1
  19.  @aroudedinsulance4307  them don't work for a boss. BE YOUR OWN BOSS. Problem solved innit?
    1
  20. One of the top states with highest average of students loans. That Supreme Court had rejected billions of Bidens Giveaway by wiping out these student loans debts out of the banks books. Incredibly desperate
    1
  21.  @gaviny-w3569  thanks Bidenomics and his agents for useless federal cases.
    1