Comments by "Ikenga Spirit" (@ikengaspirit3063) on "KaiserBauch" channel.

  1. Ah, yes. "emancipation" like they were enslaved in the first place, lol.
    721
  2. ​ @derljackson5365  women were no more property than a man of equal status. What, are u gonna tell me a serf man was less "property" than a free or rich woman?. Talkless of nobility. Ur just showing us one of the persistent tricks of feminism, comparing lower class women to higher class or completely idealized free men to pretend class and idealized differences are actually sex differences.
    183
  3. ​​ @Paul_Sergeyev  women could already get a tertiary education by themselves in the 1800s and earlier. Just to show how free they could be if they wanted. Their dependency before Feminism was in no way comparable to actually repressed people's of history.
    132
  4. Keep Malding, Y'all abt to be Humbled.
    35
  5. I think in the end, Europe's ethnic groups would just coalesce into a blurry, "European" ethnic group made in the image of Americans by the end of the 2200s certainly but maybe as early as the 2100s.
    34
  6.  @bingchilling4717  not really, like Mammoths and shit were in Europe. Aurochs, Lions etc were in Europe until historical times. Remember late ice age Eurasia was basically a cold version of the African Savannah. But while having a much lower population density than modern Africa, Europoids managed to kill them all while modern Botswana has more Elephant biomass alone than human biomass but hey, keep making up reasons to mald.
    22
  7. However it is also disproportionate like some rural tribe remain high fertility while it's urban compatriot drops.
    21
  8. ​ @buravan1512 it's mostly to keep African politicians western allies.
    20
  9. ​ @ben5056 eh, it's just malding. Let the keyboard warriors vent.
    14
  10.  @smaoproducts  I don't get what ur agreeing with him about. He's just factually wrong. Whether you call them tribes or not, they were all using iron so stone age claim is just wrong.
    12
  11. Everything here was good but for you assumption that growing population simply destines Africa to super power status. If that was true, Nigeria should already be a superpower which it isn't. India should be a superpower which it also isn't(it may be great power level, tho). There is no good reason to imagine that Africa won't just continue being irrelevant squabbling countries based on the current trajectory of their political developments.
    10
  12. And some countries have urban data. More representative Japanese data for example puts it at 98 but older over 110 data was gotten from Urban populations.
    9
  13.  @davianoinglesias5030  I think u missed the part of the video where he said that even when you compare per Capita, African countries still have higher birth rates. I think it will drop but never go sub-replacement.
    8
  14.  @spnked9516  neither will the aid stop. It is a means of political influence and attempts to influence Africa has only grown. And most of that money goes to you know, powerful politicians you need to influence not average farmer. And finally, Africa also exports food and cash crops. If Europe stops trading with Africa for some reason, those big farm owners will be forced to grow and trade on local demand.
    7
  15. 12:26 That is based on updated 2 decade old estimates that were made with questionable data. Same with much of the continent. Actual numbers are probably significantly lower by tens of millions.
    7
  16. Given that Africans continue to be relatively pro-natalist relative to wealth. I think the main issues would be the fact that alot of the current population figures are actually based off projects and faulty censuses so are probably a bit lower and the change in economic system is gonna force urban people to have less kids no matter how pro-natalist.
    7
  17.  @PeterT-i1w  that doesn't take into account, higher mortality that makes the replacement higher than the 2.1 of more developed countries.
    7
  18.  @drachenrecke5090  I don't have kids but from NG, most of the friends say they are gonna have 2 kids. But we're part of the urbanized, Westernized share of the population, who knows what the rurals are up to.
    7
  19. It's not entirely navigable. Like the mouth to the rest of the river is bridged by a huge waterfall. But I agree with you, not being navigable across the entire length I think should just create natural trade towns at non-navigable points(like several capitals of Kush) or low draft, hardy boats that have to be dragged a few miles to pass rapids(tho, Africa being more vegetacious and less animals of burden it may be more difficult to do that than in say... Scandenvia but I am not sure)
    6
  20.  @oriont6944  No starvation is coming but not because of a lack of Farming. That whole Sahel terrorism thing, it is driving farmers from their land and increasing the cost of food across the West Africa and the Sahel. Nigeria consistently sees millions displaced from its bread basket areas. It's gonna be a war caused famine cuz African governments are too inept.
    5
  21. "was basically in the stone or iron age" if you don't even know which age the vast majority of the continent was in then you have literally know too little to make the argument ur trying to make. Earthen materials were preffered over stone for their superior thermal conductivity, this is a fact mentioned by Europeans and seen across tropical and subtropical buildings. Even Mesopotamian buildings were mostly made of earth and most of Africa unlike Mesopotamia receives enough rain to decompose earthen materials after a while. Even then, the earliest known stone monuments in non-Nubian Trans-Saharan Africa are abt 2700 BC in the East(Pastoralist Neolithic) and earliest know stone buildings are abt 2000 BC in the Wes(Tichitt). That you and ur ilk don't know abt this says nothing abt African development but ur insistence to talk abt shit you don't know anything about.
    5
  22. I think it more internalizes a fear of what they did to America and Oceania being done to them. Everyday, they fear Karma screaming white genocide upon the fact there hasn't ever been one.
    5
  23.  @bingchilling4717  Yes, Savannahs are more biodiverse than Tundra and Taiga but much of Eurasia was a cold Savannah before Eurasians hunted those animals to extinction. And we know the transformation of the mammoth steppe to taiga was in great part due to those animals extinction cuz research simulating large mega fauna effects of landscape in the Lena delta in Russia is recreating Mammoth steppe and we know from tropical and subtropical savannah that lack of large ruminants converts much grassland to arid or forest climate.
    5
  24.  @andreasl_fr2666  sure but they buy those grain. Why will Europe just stop exporting grain and get less money and get poorer?. For the lols?
    4
  25. By skin colour only.
    4
  26.  @flawseeingeye  i am pretty sure the Av African bathes more than the Av Europoid given the surprise of Americans that people in Botswana(a highly arid country) bathe twice a day on average. But of course, this must just be projection.
    4
  27.  @vangoghsear8657  the anglosphere countries are essentially 100 by definition. Every new era of measuring calibrates its 100 to the anglosphere countries.
    4
  28. @coginito8365 They lost their conquest so, malding.
    4
  29.  @andreasl_fr2666  it is more general global economic down turn (of which the lack of European grain is one important exacerbating factor) than is the cause of the rising issues. Either way, if there'll be a famine it would be due to internal reasons like massive insecurity due to people turning to crime as the economy declines and not due to lack of imports cuz the lack of Ukrainian grain imports themselves still didn't cause a famine. It did make food more expensive but it didn't cause a famine.
    3
  30. It never even began.
    3
  31. And they buy those food and fertilizer. Is it average Western and 2nd world Megacorp suddenly gonna start denying to sell products for the lols? Are you gonna buy it instead?.
    3
  32. So are you a reformed Yakub or are you actually Yashmal?.
    3
  33. @gabrielamora6265  okay, if women were just property, how do you explain all the examples of Suo jure (women owning property in their own right) in medieval Europe. Remember Eleanor of Aquitaine owned Aquitaine in her own right, if she was property why wasn't it her male relatives that owned her and Aquitaine?.
    3
  34. Try it and see TED.
    3
  35. That's Catholicism and most of Africa is Protestant.
    3
  36.  @TheKindofTiredSleepCantFix  But Botswana still hasn't stagnanted just gone from growing like crazy to growing slow but steady.
    3
  37. You do realize that much of that is actually publically justified on reducing birth rates right? And that birth rates actually dropped during that period right?.
    3
  38. ​ @onlineonlineaccount2368  yeah, the Original Comment was certainly written by unmelaninated hands.
    3
  39.  @obrnenydrevokocur9344  alot of those grain just get stolen and sold back to the people to line someone's pocket. If they could buy it through intermediaries before, they can buy it more directly after.
    2
  40. That's still in doubt give rains are actually increasing in the Sahara(area that will hold more people with more rain) and reducing in the Forest zone(area that will hold more people with less rain) and industrial modern techniques have bad land efficiency even tho it is more labour efficient. A Labour intensive but land efficient method could be exactly what they need all things considered.
    2
  41. Um, Poors still be having their kids tho.
    2
  42. 2:11 no, people like Fiamengo have for a while now shown that Feminism was always like this. People are just finally less willing and capable to ignore today's equivalents to the SCUM manifesto or declaration of sentiments. 2:47 oh, so that's why he ignored all the above to pretend Feminism just got toxic yesterday. 20:15 actually, no. The movement was always dominated by man hating women. This is something women themselves noticed and complained about in Catherine Ochunu's Womanism and
    2
  43. 29:34 I think the desert and rainforest angle are the only ones that necessarily hold up. Afro-Asiatic pastoralists (well, they also did some Agriculture) penetrated As far as Botswana from around Old Kingdom era Aswan. Didn't result in any massive civilizational change and they got pwned by Nilotes and Bantus upon whatever advantages that tie to the greater near east should have done in cultural technology. Upon the deep ports issue, East Africa had ports that traded with the Indian ocean world since at least the late bronze age(similarly with the Baltic). The kind of expected result from this theory didn't result either. I think the first geographical argument is probably the most important as while it didn't necessarily stop people moving, it did stop Empires moving and Empires did alot to spread tech and connections that is today underestimated.
    2
  44. What do you mean a third. 80% of the world WILL BE BLACK AFRICAN.
    2
  45. Lol, where do you think this problem start from?.
    2
  46. 6:53 they were right. They were just wrong about who was The "civilized race" and who were the "barbarian races"(literal step barbarians) Who was rhe "stronger race" and who was the "weaker race" Which "indigenous group" was gonna get replaced.
    2
  47. Unironically YES.
    2
  48. ​ @Elio-t8s  South Eurasians and East Eurasians are ultimately part of the same clade separate from West Eurasians and SSA. So no, if you go by his logic, South Asians would just have to stay in equatorial and pseudo-equatorial Asia.
    2
  49. GOOD.
    2
  50. Ah, yes. Their exporters will just decide not to sell to a huge Market cuz America no longer cares?. Trust me bro. Brazil will just let it's export economy partially collapse cuz no America.
    2