Comments by "Ikenga Spirit" (@ikengaspirit3063) on "Luke Smith" channel.

  1. @Glizzster it's a joke.
    28
  2. 52:00 The issue with the Solutrean hypothesis is that well, these are extremely simple designs. There are only so many ways to flake a pice of rock into knief and finding one of those 3 ways somewhere doesn't prove much.
    6
  3. 49:49 The Madagascar stuff is like this, Austronesians(ancestors of Polynesians) came there like 500 BC and are the Austronesian element of modern Madagascarns is the current official but tool evidence goes back as far as 1500 BC(which may be supported by Madagascarn myths) and the theory I go with at least since 1500 BC hunter gatherers of of Austronesia and possibly also Negrito stock came there and the 500 BC probably earlier, people were replaced largely. As for the SS African component, it is Bantu and Bantu are initially from West Africa and first reached the Eastern coast of Africa like around 200 AD, but like 500 years after reaching the east coast of Africa they had become populated enough to start settling Madagascar as well. Modern Malagasy are like 50/50 Bantu-Austronesian
    4
  4. Y tho?
    3
  5. yeah, and the argument is that we didn't evolve to be rational to be perfect scientists but we evolved to be rational to fulfil social and survival needs.
    2
  6. 3:50 the thing I think that's different is population density but nothing up to our level of advancement could have ever existed, now Sumer level maybe but Medieval Europe level is still unlikely.
    2
  7. The Industrial revolution and its consequences has been a disaster for the human race.
    2
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdsDzZDMzKM
    1
  9. Best of my knowledge, settlement of the Americas has been moved to at least as far back as 30,000 BC
    1
  10.  @Kuudere-Kun  So you are basically agreeing that the Jews and Muslims were right about Christians being lawless?
    1
  11.  @Kuudere-Kun  The argument from Muslims and Jews that Christians are lawless is as old as the middle ages(which is about as old as the islamic religion is). And Muslims have a law, the Quran. Jews have a law, the Torah, what law do Christians have after Peter and especially Paul arguing against the Law? Basically nothing, thus Christians are lawless.
    1
  12.  @Kuudere-Kun  That's not really a Law system, at least not comparable to the Quran or any modern constitution. It is most comparable to what is "the spirit of the law" in most actually developed laws. In other words, like "Love God with all your heart and love your Neighbour as yourself" is analogous to Spinoza's "What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour, that is the whole Torah, the rest is commentary(Elaboration)". Where is the Elaboration of Christian law as its own law system, like all other coherent forms of Law would dictate because that Love quote is as useless as no law at all given its high subjectivity.
    1
  13. Any Tutorial on how a complete normie can do this?
    1
  14.  @ThatSaintsRowFan  I don't know man, tried it, copy and pasted it into the txt file but it isn't working.
    1
  15. I mean, On some level I feel like I agree with both of you. Yes, by the definition and what is going on in your brain, they are still addictions and many of these addictions can be tied to childhood trauma and maldevelopment but Luke is still right that most of these behavoural addictions can be done away with by changing you behaviour, even those that are connected to childhood issues can be done away by the same method, even if conducting with a professional (like with most things) can more easily hep you through it.
    1
  16. Thanks for informing this Normie.
    1